Jamie Spears' lawyer Vivian Thoreen gives interview on Good Morning America: Jamie saved Britney's life

[alienatedNey]

Idk which is funnier - her long pauses or the fact that she’s avoiding to answer the questions. 
If they thought they could convince people with this interview, they’re dumb af because none of her answers were convincing and she looked nervous af lmao  even her botox couldn’t help her keep a straight face 

[PokemonSpears]

24 minutes ago, PickleSpears said:

It's all so hard bc I do believe her about Jamie saving Britney's life. She was headed in such a bad direction. And if it's true that her net worth was $2.8 million or whatever it was... that's shocking. But yeah I still don't understand why Britney is still in it. There's so much that we don't know and it's almost like we can't fully judge it until Britney herself comes out and speaks about it and tells her side. Which I understand she probably can't do right now but there's definitely more to the story than we know.

that's the thing, people have ate up the story about her needed to be saved by her father.

If Vivian is right about something is precisely that we all need to go back and see what happened back then. She may have needed help, but conservatorship wasn't the only option. Heck, it shouldn't even have been an option for someone of Britney's characteristics. There's powers of attorney and many other legal resources that could have let them help her protect her finances, or put restraining orders against undesirable people. No need for conservatorships. That's the myth that needs to be ended. 

[PokemonSpears]

5 minutes ago, alienatedNey said:

Idk which is funnier - her long pauses or the fact that she’s avoiding to answer the questions. 
If they thought they could convince people with this interview, they’re dumb af because none of her answers were convincing and she looked nervous af lmao  even her botox couldn’t help her keep a straight face 

typical lawyer answers, but the robot tone and the blinking a mile a minute show the fakeness of it all 

[SS91]

Of course his LAWYER is gonna say that. 

[ObsessedBritFan1]

 

[OnlyBeyonce]

So if her father has saved her why she don't stop her fanbase and the entire world from accusing him? 

[argentinian.in.telaviv]

It's amazing how we can dig and dig and prove all this "professional" people wrong. Like seriously.

[bitbitboi]

1) Vivian said "I understand that every story needs a villain", and the next thing she does is to say that back then "people were harming her". So she's basically continuing the narrative, just changing the "villain".

2) Britney said in court that SHE IS AFRAID OF HER FATHER. This should stop right there, what are we even discussing.

[argentinian.in.telaviv]

 Full video 

The dislike button, I love us.

[Martini]

hahahahahaha they tried it

 

bye

 

[asitalian12587]

obvious damage control on the part of Jamie's team but its not working. look at all the comments under the video, no one is buying this ****. Keep trying Viv, it'll just make you look worse 

[ICouldntThinkOfOne]

As as I hate that GMA had her on, that reported did a good job by not letting her dodge questions.

 

The fact that she spoke for Britney about britney is fighting against in court, only to say "you'll have to ask Britney that!" When she was cornered.

[DougFrmBrazil]

We need to call out ABC News too. Diane Sawyer has yet to speak out and why GMA is not on Britney side? It makes me ashamed that I have to agree with Trump on how media is unfair.

[car]

Ok what are these lowball questions... why didn’t they ask the burning questions: 

“why does her dad then have a restraining order against her kids?”

”how can someone who needs a conservatorship able to perform all around the world for years?” 

[ZoneGirl]

The sit-down was strange. Even without the apparent video conference time delay.

Vivian did not answer any of the questions and, idk, if I were going to take something to court, I don't know that I would address it with the person directly. I may be wrong, but wouldn't a lawyer advise you not to talk about that?

Also, that trip to La. occurred early in the pandemic, as they said. The filing about her being afraid of her father didn't emerge until November. Things can change in that time span. Especially if she's at home considering her life and what she wants it to look like at this point.

The lawyer, and Jamie through her, are clearly trying to change the narrative. I'm not convinced that they did a good job even for the general public. 

[ChristianDO]

Yeah, this was just team con's attempt at saving face with the general public. What I find comical is that Vivian focuses on 2020 throughout the interview when the issues really started around 2018/19 surrounding domination and the "indefinite work hiatus." She was just being a good lawyer and avoiding/ redirecting questions. This interview was a waste of everyone's time.

[Sea flower]

That was so bad LMAO nobody will believe it

[Peter Pan]

Did she do bad on purpose? What a mess! Good. This won’t help Jamie. 

[mythology]

Saving Britney's life shouldnt give Jamie the right to own it.  **** this *****

[PickleSpears]

48 minutes ago, PokemonSpears said:

that's the thing, people have ate up the story about her needed to be saved by her father.

If Vivian is right about something is precisely that we all need to go back and see what happened back then. She may have needed help, but conservatorship wasn't the only option. Heck, it shouldn't even have been an option for someone of Britney's characteristics. There's powers of attorney and many other legal resources that could have let them help her protect her finances, or put restraining orders against undesirable people. No need for conservatorships. That's the myth that needs to be ended. 

But my point has always been that we were NOT there. We viewed from the outside and we can speculate but we have no idea the details of any of it, really. I can definitely see a c-ship being useful to protect her money and maybe get her medical help if she was refusing. Britney was not in a good place in early 2008 at all and that did change when she was put under the c-ship. But like I said, we do NOT know everything that went on. We only saw a little bit. And we will never know all the details. It's just so hard to judge and make conclusions about situations we weren't there for. I hope Britney can tell her story one day. But even then there's always 3 sides to a story.