Danielle1987 Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 2 minutes ago, Bundy said: It did. He was on a reality show for people overweight. He "tried" to be a star in every way possible without any talent or charisma whatsoever just using Britneys connection to his lazy talentless ***. I think this fake apology happened in that show That smugness on his face says it all! Link to comment
The_Original_Toy Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 what if they’re paying homage to those days when britney would party with paris hilton? we know kim loves paris Link to comment
adamhadem310 Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 When they changed the Glory cover a few months ago and released Mood Ring and all the remixes didn’t Britney post about it on her Instagram? Wasn’t it to thank us for getting Glory back in the charts? If she wants us to support this rerelease wouldn’t she at least mention it to us? Link to comment
TheySayImCrazy18 Posted November 24, 2020 Author Share Posted November 24, 2020 9 minutes ago, bliss said: I don't believe this, aren't the 2 new tracks supposedly from the glory sessions? doesn't make sense that the song features Kim Petras since she only came out in like 2017 It could be newer, it’s not like she didn’t record songs from 2017 - 2018. Link to comment
bliss Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 4 minutes ago, TheySayImCrazy18 said: It could be newer, it’s not like she didn’t record songs from 2017 - 2018. true but I doubt they would include songs recorded outside of the era knowing they had other songs from the glory sessions 1 Link to comment
Stefani Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 Kim Petras? Why does Brit always collaborate with unknowns? 1 Link to comment
Drunkerella91 Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 I'm having a hard time with this one. Releasing unheard songs (swimming in the stars) is one thing. They've been recorded a long time ago and they can use them however they want. But this one must've been produced this year without B's approval. Kim Petras is not someone they would've thought of in 2016. I like Kim but this feels like using Britney's brand gor herself even tho its widely know B does not want to work. MEH...... Link to comment
Isla Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 Ddd so not Mood Ring then? They really gonna include the remixes but not the original version of the song? Not sure how to feel about this tbh. Link to comment
Alexanda Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 5 minutes ago, Stefani said: Kim Petras? Why does Brit always collaborate with unknowns? Girl, you missed so much: She is so good! 1 Link to comment
Guest Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 17 minutes ago, adamhadem310 said: When they changed the Glory cover a few months ago and released Mood Ring and all the remixes didn’t Britney post about it on her Instagram? Wasn’t it to thank us for getting Glory back in the charts? If she wants us to support this rerelease wouldn’t she at least mention it to us? Even if it was posted, who knows If itd be genuine? Its not like they havent forced her to do things before. Link to comment
S jones Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 1 hour ago, MyahJeanSpears said: To be honest I truly believe her team WAS trying to sabotage her with Britney Jean in particular. To be honest the last time Britney even made a public appearance (the announcement of her Domination tour) I was thinking to myself if I were here I'd be majorly depressed. The two songs they play as she shows up on stage are "Work *****" and "Till the World Ends." She has no vocals on WB and the part that they play of TTWE (See the sunlight we aint stopping) she's not even actually singing in. I feel as an artist that must make you feel creatively bankrupt. Furthermore, to me its not a coincidence that the opening song to piece of me for 5 years was a song (Which again, did not feature her vocals) that was basically mocking her entire situation. You want a hot body? You want a Bugatti? You want a Maserati? You better work ***** You want a Lamborghini? Sippin' martinis? Look hot in a bikini? You better work ***** You wanna live fancy? Live in a big mansion? Party in France? You better work *****, you better work ***** You better work *****, you better work ***** Now get to work *****! Now get to work *****! Its straight up mocking her. Saying that she wanted to be a celebrity so whether she wants to or not she is going to work. Its really the most sinister thing I can think of in her career. She clearly wanted no part of the album and they went and made it without her anyway. Then to add insult to injury, they grabbed an album they knew she had no input in, no vocals in, etc and forced her to go promote it as her "most personal album ever." So personal in fact that Myah is singing lead on a duet with BRITNEY'S SISTER. To humiliate her even further they went ahead and gave her writing credits on almost every track on an album that they KNEW was bad. To me, Britney's own team has been working against her for a long time. Which is why I am so happy that she finally found her inner strength and decided enough was enough. That is probably why I will not be supporting Juicy Couture or the rest of the milking of the Glory re-release. JC sounds like shallow pop trash anyway. But Britney is clearly not involved in any of these shady business dealings. She has let her stance known, and I think if it were up to her she wouldn't be releasing anything at the moment. Common! Work ***** is iconic! Britney was never famous for her vocals! She was excited about work ***** and perfume ! It’s just the album was poorly produced. Also, FF is her 2nd worst album, but still ionic! criminal that deemed failure after its release is doing great on streaming platforms! just as a reminder, Britney loved it when Glory went number 1 on iTunes! She won’t hAte the idea of a re- release! also it’s a good promotion for B10! She will get rid of Jamie soon! Probably In December Link to comment
Guest Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 19 minutes ago, Danielle1987 said: That smugness on his face says it all! He did all for the cameras. He wanted a controversy so that **** show would be talked about on the news and for that he used Britney once again. Link to comment
JP9101 Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 I thought she was a meme 2 1 Link to comment
RhysRadar Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 23 minutes ago, bliss said: true but I doubt they would include songs recorded outside of the era knowing they had other songs from the glory sessions Why’s that Link to comment
Alexanda Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 22 minutes ago, Drunkerella91 said: I'm having a hard time with this one. Releasing unheard songs (swimming in the stars) is one thing. They've been recorded a long time ago and they can use them however they want. But this one must've been produced this year without B's approval. Kim Petras is not someone they would've thought of in 2016. I like Kim but this feels like using Britney's brand gor herself even tho its widely know B does not want to work. MEH...... I doubt it's from this year, she is working with Dr. Luke for a long time now. Dr. Luke knows Max Martin. So And she started as a songwriter first, would make sense. After the Kesha-thing she got a lot of backlash for working with him. Link to comment
Alexanda Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 7 minutes ago, RhysRadar said: Why’s that Making new songs is expensive. Imagine having 30-50 total Glory tracks, why should they produce new ones? And yes, they record a lot for just one album. Link to comment
mattyciulla Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 I would looove for this to be real but it simply isn’t. Britney didn’t work with max martin for glory and if it’s a unreleased track from glory then it had to of been recorded back around 2015. Kim petras in 2015 was pretty much a newcomer and there really doesn’t make any sense for Britney to collab with an underground pop newbie around this era. Lastly Kim petras rarely works with anyone who isn’t dr luke beside a few dance collabs. Kim around this time unfortunately couldn’t score a track with Max Martin without a major label support let alone a collab with the queen of pop herself. Link to comment
OlliePop Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 This doesn't see right to me. Isn't there a rumored Paris Hilton and Kim Petras collaboration that is yet to be released? Juicy Couture sounds very Paris to me. 1 Link to comment
Leader Jordan Miller Posted November 24, 2020 Leader Share Posted November 24, 2020 8 minutes ago, mattyciulla said: I would looove for this to be real but it simply isn’t. Britney didn’t work with max martin for glory and if it’s a unreleased track from glory then it had to of been recorded back around 2015. Kim petras in 2015 was pretty much a newcomer and there really doesn’t make any sense for Britney to collab with an underground pop newbie around this era. Lastly Kim petras rarely works with anyone who isn’t dr luke beside a few dance collabs. Kim around this time unfortunately couldn’t score a track with Max Martin without a major label support let alone a collab with the queen of pop herself. Kim could've jumped on the track this year tho - replacing one of Britney's verses with her vocals Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | TikTok | YouTube Link to comment
Recommended Posts