Jump to content

#FREEBRITNEY | Britney’s Gram Received Worrying Voicemail Regarding Britney


Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, puppylo16 said:

Yeah I assume came ITZ time, Larry was her sole manager. I guess she thought she didn’t want any associations with JT or it would remind her of their relationship?

I think It was smt about that. She seemed kinda pissed on a couple times when she talked about him in 03. Maybe the last time they got together, she got pissed off and Johnny defended him somehow. Or maybe she just didnt want to share a manager with her ex bc she didnt want to know anything about JT anymore and didnt want Johnny mentioning anything about her life to him either. Imagine calling ur manager and he says he cant talk bc hes with JT or he says hes busy dealing with some JTs stuffs. One way or another shed hear his name or even know about his life, even if it was lil things about his schedule, trips or whatever.

Link to comment
13 minutes ago, land said:

 

Jon Eardley was never hired by Britney Spears formally. Can't say if she somehow contacted him, but you're right, he did act more on the interests of Sam Lufti than Britney herself. Though his motion did make sense, as in asking the case to go to federal court. What is interesting to notice is that he became a lawyer in 1987 and had never been disciplined by the court until after he got involved in Britney's case, which makes me think it may not be very good for a lawyer to try getting into this case at all. 

 

You can check his status here:

 

https://members.calbar.ca.gov/fal/Licensee/Detail/132577

 

His legal problems started in 2011, 2 years after Britney's estate got a restraining order against him. Just seems odd that a lawyer working for more than 20 years all of a sudden starts being disciplined by California's court, the same court who is maintaining this conservatorship for more than 11 years. Also is important to notice what his lawyer said at the time he got a restraining order against him:

 

“It’s a misapplication of the law. We will appeal,” his statement read. “It’s a misuse of the statute, primarily because Britney Spears never testified she suffered substantial emotional distress, nor did she even file a declaration to that effect. It was never disputed that she authorized Mr. Eardley to take the action that he took on her behalf.”

 

https://www.accessonline.com/articles/judge-grants-restraining-order-against-sam-lutfi-attorney-jon-eardley-70501

 

Meaning Britney never testified against the lawyer nor claimed his statements (of her contacting him) were false. Her conservators were the only ones fighting him without a hearing from Britney herself.

 

Also the conservatorship lawyer at the time admitted a restraining order in this case is 'unusual'.

 

https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/britney-spears-cries-for-help-lead-to-three-year-restraining-orders-for-ex-manager-lawyer-103538/

 

Now, the actual lawyer Britney hired on 2008 is another case entirely. She hired Adam Streisand, which is a very successful lawyer that won a $2billion dollar trial and is cousin to Barbra Streisand herself.

 

"Mr. Streisand’s trial victory for former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer against Donald Sterling resulted in Ballmer’s $2 billion purchase of the Los Angeles Clippers. ... And true to his word, Mr. Streisand not only won the case but also walked away with Jim and Johnny Buss’s resignations from all four Buss family trusts as a guarantee against any threat in the future."

 

https://www.natlawreview.com/author/adam-streisand

 

He was hired by Britney on the weekend following the conservatorship being established because she felt "her father should not be her conservator". He was simply ejected from the courtroom and right away judge Reva Goetz (the one being constantly reviewed as corrupted) decided to extend the cship. Now obviously in this case him being such a successful lawyer and cousin of a celebrity, team Britney did nothing against him... but anyway it speaks a lot that Britney hired such a strong lawyer to represent her. And also speaks a lot that the jugde not only ignored her case entirely but decided right after her appeal to extend the cship.

 

https://www.mtv.com/news/1580917/britney-spears-lawyer-ejected-from-courtroom-after-judge-doesnt-recognize-him-as-her-counsel/

 

Let's also remember that although Britney's relationship with Sam Lufti and co is far from perfect, her relationship with her father is not much better. Long before the cship or any of that 2007 drama, she already had a very troubled relationship with him on record and he was an alcoholic which makes it even more weird that he was appointed as conservator with the basis being mental health.

 

I think none of them should have been Britney's conservator as they are troubled themselves and had a difficult relationship with her. If that was really so necessary she should have been able to appoint the conservator herself which was her case in 2008 actually. 

 

Is it any good for you to be "saved" by someone you have a difficult relationship with and ir order to get saved have to receive order from that person 24/7? I think Britney acting out of heart and robotic fits the idea she never really thought she was being saved in this case. She's only truly herself when around her kids which is prob the reason she didn't completely bailed on this (the custody case is not 100% on her hand).

I've linked this page in the past but I think the misconception about Eardley being formally hired might have come from this article https://www.mtv.com/news/1582277/britney-spears-has-been-robbed-her-self-proclaimed-lawyer-insists/

Quote

"[...] a lawyer who claims to represent the singer is making some serious allegations on her behalf, claiming in federal-court documents that her assets may have been misappropriated.

In a declaration filed Friday, Jon Eardley maintains that the pop star's civil rights have been violated, including her right to be heard "as to the appropriateness" of her father, Jamie Spears, being given co-conservatorship powers over her person and estate. Spears attempted to hire a lawyer, Adam Streisand, to fight the conservatorship, but he stepped down February 7 after the probate court ruled that Britney lacked the capacity to retain direct counsel of her own choosing.

[...] Eardley is adamant that, despite the court's ruling that Britney can't hire a lawyer, she did in fact hire him on February 12; she has spoken to him on the phone (until her phone was taken away and disconnected); and she authorizes his allegations, which he filed in part on Friday and plans to continue filing [...] "She is party to this," said Eardley's spokesperson Michael Sands, who also reps the singer's onetime manager Sam Lutfi. "She gave her full authority.""

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
3 hours ago, cieldemiel said:

Sam has confirmed now she's fine, I think it's about time this calms down tbh. I guess the intentions were somewhat good at the start but now it should stop... It was a massive overreaction based on pure speculation. 

And you believe that? -_-

Link to comment

I'm sorry but whenever I hear about the illuminati it cracks me up. I used to believe in that crap when I smoked pot but I see now it's all just a scheme to get people to watch and look at songs. Whenever an artist says "I sold my sole to the devil" they mean they sold their souls to a record company\producer. They have no freedom or rights and they literally do what they are told to (fifth harmony, Kesha, Gaga) when it comes to illuminati symbols in music videos. It's all for views. Katy Perry was never one for illuminati symbols, and when dark horse started to lose its traction for the number one spot she released a heavily illuminati music video to get the views. Same with any other artist. Even if someone doesn't like their music they'll watch it for the illuminati symbolS

 

Sorry rant over back to what matters

  • Like 3
Link to comment
1 minute ago, Stevenroro said:

I just wanted to tell y'all that Jamie Lynn deleted both my comment to her on her post about Britney and my comment on Lynn's comment to "Please help your daughter #FreeBritney!" They are both gone. 

What a shame.

I'm so unsure on what to think about Jamie Lynn, there is a piece of me, that just cringes when I see her talking about Britney, do not take me wrong but sometimes it just feels like publicity, I hope I'm completely wrong, but sometimes it just seems fishy.... Not to mention her morbid fascination with Satan's child, Lou Taylor :surething:

Link to comment
1 minute ago, Stevenroro said:

I just wanted to tell y'all that Jamie Lynn deleted both my comment to her on her post about Britney and my comment on Lynn's comment to "Please help your daughter #FreeBritney!" They are both gone. 

What a shame.

Her family didn't help her get out for the past 11 years so it's not like they're gonna do it now. Why won't the fans stop contacting them? Ignore her family altogether, they're clearly benefiting from the conservatorship anyway so please stop. They're not going to speak about it either... This is not helping. Let JL promote the laxatives and post pictures of her babies or whatever. No one cares.

  • Like 8
Link to comment
1 minute ago, Circus Leader said:

I'm so unsure on what to think about Jamie Lynn, there is a piece of me, that just cringes when I see her talking about Britney, do not take me wrong but sometimes it just feels like publicity, I hope I'm completely wrong, but sometimes it just seems fishy.... Not to mention her morbid fascination with Satan's child, Lou Taylor :surething:

can someone back me up on instagram i  commented on jamie lynns britney post.. thing about the conservatorship now im getting bashed by fans hard my insta is d4nielr thanks

 

#prayforme

Link to comment
29 minutes ago, land said:

Let's also remember that although Britney's relationship with Sam Lufti and co is far from perfect, her relationship with her father is not much better. Long before the cship or any of that 2007 drama, she already had a very troubled relationship with him on record and he was an alcoholic which makes it even more weird that he was appointed as conservator with the basis being mental health.

 

I think none of them should have been Britney's conservator as they are troubled themselves and had a difficult relationship with her. If that was really so necessary she should have been able to appoint the conservator herself which was her case in 2008 actually. 

 

Is it any good for you to be "saved" by someone you have a difficult relationship with and ir order to get saved have to receive order from that person 24/7? I think Britney acting out of heart and robotic fits the idea she never really thought she was being saved in this case. She's only truly herself when around her kids which is prob the reason she didn't completely bailed on this (the custody case is not 100% on her hand).

Exactly this. If Britney looks sicker now than she did in 2007 it's because they've made her sick. I can't imagine being under the control of someone you never had a good relationship with. It's literally abuse. AND LEGAL WTF

  • Like 8
Link to comment
3 hours ago, land said:

 

Her case is a public case in California's public records. Ever since the beginning she has tried according to these official records to fight the conservatorship at least 7 times, but was denied by the jugde on her case, a judge that people review on her official page as 'corrupted'.

 

If you want to check it out for yourself, her case is number #:BP108870 on California's court website.

 

OCutMs6.jpg

 

aM6a9wr.jpg

 

there you have proof she can't choose her own friends, make phone calls, use her own money, ride her own car.... everything is on the hands of her conservator (in this case her dad).

 

the timeline of her appealing the conservatorship in public records:

 

2008: she first appeals it (deemed mentally unstable)

2009: before Circus Tour: she sends an evaluation by a psychiatrist asking for the end of the conservatorship

March 30, 2009 (a month after Circus Tour began): her dad fights her own motion, asking for a second psychiatrist evaluation

July 23, 2009: new psychiatrist agrees with first psychiatrist and also asks for the conservatorship to end

May 28, 2010: Britney and psychiatrist send and update on her mental health to give more evidence on her being mentally stable

July 29, 2011 (during Femme Fatale when she was doped af): Jamie and conservatorship lawyer makes a urgent statement

Right after that Britney and her own lawyer makes their own statement

 

April 6, 2012: Jamie asks for her boyfriend at that time, Jason Trawick, to be added as a conservator

August 21, 2012: Britney files a petition asking to shorten the conservatorship

*Media reports Britney had a meeting with the jugde on her case arguing that "she's the only person under a conservatorship to sign a $50 million deal to be a judge on a live tv show". Wants conservatorship to end. Denied by the judge.

 

2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018: no updates on her case.

 

March 4, 2019: Britney files a new urgent petition (no details) and a memo (legal defend on her behalf)

Right after that Jamie files a petition against her

Then there's a register of a lawyer, Andrew Wallet (co-conservator), being fired and asking to get paid *The same who allegedly spoke with Britney's Gram via voicemail after a month.

Britney files a new memo (no detail)

Jamie Spears (conservator) files a new petition against Britney

Britney is sent to a mental facility

 

It appears every time she tries to petition and/or fight the conservatorship she's medicated. Only this time it got worse (they lost one conservator), so it makes sense they sent her to a mental facility. 

 

That's literally official public records, therefore proof she doesnt want this.

Wow just wow

Link to comment
48 minutes ago, I Always Sing Live said:

Tess and Barbara, our skinny legends, seem to have dragged Perez Hilton a bit.. :smokney:

that last sentence is kinda ironic though considering the voicemail.. :britdrown:

I haven't been a fan of Perez ever since I found out he kicked Lance bass out of the closet. He's just as money hungry as everyone else

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

We noticed you're using an ad blocker  :ehum_britney_um_unsure_confused_what:

Thanks for visiting Exhale! Your support is greatly appreciated 💜  

Exhale survives through advertising revenue. Please, disable your ad block extension to help us and continue browsing Exhale. 🙏

I've disabled ad block