Jump to content

#FREEBRITNEY | Britney’s Gram Received Worrying Voicemail Regarding Britney


Recommended Posts

In 2008 :

$2,8M

Note : the $2,8M is what remained in Britney's assets at the end of the year, after  $10M were spent that year, including the the $3,7M on legal fees to pay the 17 lawyers.

Interesting to see that on this estate report nothing but « cash » appears, her homes; cars; furnitures; jewelry or entities does not appear .

 

In 2009 : +$24,3M

$27,500,000 According to TMZ

No document found online

In 2010 : +$4,9M

$32,4M

$973,547.79 in legal fees

This time her properties, entities interests appears, could it explain the nearly +$30M difference in 2 years ?

2012 : + $2,2M

$36,4M

$17,7M in stocks , mutual funds and other investment

$1,1M fees legal fees

From TMZ : 

On top of that, since 2010, Britney had a successful concert tour that raked in $68 million and she signed a $15 million deal with "X Factor. »

Yet it is "only" $2,2M in 2 years

In 2013 = -$0,3

$36,1M According to TMZ

According to TMZ she made $14M the year before and spent $7M

No Court documents online

In 2014 : +$9,9M

$46M

$901,845.88 Legal fees reported

In 2015 : +$4M

$50M

In 2016 : +5M

$55M

She made $16M and spent $10M according to EOnline

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
1 hour ago, Cappycorn87 said:

We have a new judge who made it happen 

Her team is running like chickens with their heads cut off and now they are changing their tune due to the investigation.

Is that the judge who closed her eyes when Andrew Wallet compared Britney's conservatorship to a hybrid business model? She even granted him a raise after that. :drown:

  • Like 2
Link to comment

The real question is why have all the leaks and investigations immediately stopped? No new leaked documents or nothing.

 

Something is wrong, it seems as if that as soon as there was a green light to drill Lou and Jamie, documents started to emerge, leaked emails etc.. And now after the court hearing it seems like that the green light turned  red and all the leakage stopped.

 

I've got a feeling that this was all orchestrated by someone, not sure who, but :idkney:

  • Like 2
Link to comment

The numbers don't make any sense. According to the Times in 2008 

16 minutes ago, Monsah said:

The real question is why have all the leaks and investigations immediately stopped? No new leaked documents or nothing.

 

Something is wrong, it seems as if that as soon as there was a green light to drill Lou and Jamie, documents started to emerge, leaked emails etc.. And now after the court hearing it seems like that the green light turned  red and all the leakage stopped.

 

I've got a feeling that this was all orchestrated by someone, not sure who, but :idkney:

I think the fanbase is satisfied with the outcome of the hearing and that's why it slowed down.

Link to comment
35 minutes ago, Meaner03 said:

I am not worried about the investigation, the big part was the fact that Brenda granted Lynn and her lawyers the right to take a look at the cship case and every documents, based on this it is like 2 investigations that will come out in September , one by the court and the other one from Lynn's team, they won't escape and i hope not even Wallet and his early resignation will

Lovely news to hear

  • Like 2
Link to comment
50 minutes ago, Mr_Steven_Spears said:

Can someone clarify what trade secrets are ? 

 

There have been trade secrets hearings at least since 2008.

Around this time, on other forums they said it’s rumoured to be them mixing britneys voice with another singer and the legal formality of this when marketing the music. I mean we kind of know this is truth now but back then it wasn’t. Even in womanizer a deep woman’s voice is heard in the chorus.

. It was around that time that Ted casablanca wrote a blind item that was called Milli Vanilli  About an artist that passes others recording as her own.

whatever the hearing is, it’s about an element of her career that needs to remain private as she makes money on it.

Link to comment
2 minutes ago, chizwhiz said:

There have been trade secrets hearings at least since 2008.

Around this time, on other forums they said it’s rumoured to be them mixing britneys voice with another singer and the legal formality of this when marketing the music. I mean we kind of know this is truth now but back then it wasn’t. Even in womanizer a deep woman’s voice is heard in the chorus.

. It was around that time that Ted casablanca wrote a blind item that was called Princess Powder Puff. About an artist that passes others recording as her own.

whatever the hearing is, it’s about an element of her career that needs to remain private as she makes money on it.

I doubt Britney brought up her ghost singer into the conservertorship hearing. 

:lowkeyno:

  • Like 3
Link to comment
7 minutes ago, chizwhiz said:

There have been trade secrets hearings at least since 2008.

Around this time, on other forums they said it’s rumoured to be them mixing britneys voice with another singer and the legal formality of this when marketing the music. I mean we kind of know this is truth now but back then it wasn’t. Even in womanizer a deep woman’s voice is heard in the chorus.

. It was around that time that Ted casablanca wrote a blind item that was called Milli Vanilli  About an artist that passes others recording as her own.

whatever the hearing is, it’s about an element of her career that needs to remain private as she makes money on it.

This is total bullshit. 

"Even in womanizer a deep woman’s voice is heard in the chorus"

Um yeah they're called backing vocals... every song has them. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
13 minutes ago, chizwhiz said:

There have been trade secrets hearings at least since 2008.

Around this time, on other forums they said it’s rumoured to be them mixing britneys voice with another singer and the legal formality of this when marketing the music. I mean we kind of know this is truth now but back then it wasn’t. Even in womanizer a deep woman’s voice is heard in the chorus.

. It was around that time that Ted casablanca wrote a blind item that was called Milli Vanilli  About an artist that passes others recording as her own.

whatever the hearing is, it’s about an element of her career that needs to remain private as she makes money on it.

Why haven't we had more albums then? :hiii:

Jk just aiming for some humor in here...

But in all serious let's keep up with the pressure...Lou can't get away with this

Link to comment
16 minutes ago, Meaner03 said:

Actually Brenda J Penny  was the judge when Wallet asked for a raise and compared the cship to an hybrid business . 

This is why it is important to keep the pressure and any news / informations we can get about any of those people is important to keep the pressure on all of them.

The may 10th outcome is exactly what the #FreeBritney movement asked for, i take Lynn and lawyers right to get all the informations as a bonus, but we still don't really know what provoked all of this, from Domination cancelation to Wallet quick resignation, the paralegal leak, the first court hearing that got Britney talking to the judge and confirming the paralegal . The reaction from team cship makes me think it could be bigger than what we think and have, and they are scared that other got leaked .

 

It's so f**ked up that Wallet compared Britney's conservatorship to a hybrid business model and he even got a raise after that...

  • Like 3
Link to comment
2 hours ago, falka said:

I don't think I heard this before and not really believe it's true :idgi: where are those mails?

 

1 hour ago, BKSTYL3 said:

https://www.accessonline.com/articles/report-britney-spears-planning-las-vegas-comeback-63716

May 27, 2008

A new report has emerged claiming Britney Spears could be in line for a $10 million paycheck for a one-time Las Vegas comeback show, followed by a series of concert dates.

Rumors were sparked that Britney was planning a Vegas gig when she was spotted dining in Los Angeles last week with her friend — The Palms owner George Maloof.

Now, Britain’s News of The World has published a report claiming the pop star will play a gig at The Palms Hotel and Casino at the end of the year.

 

 

Britain’s News of The World Article: (https://web.archive.org/web/20080606175641/https://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/2505_britney_spears_one_off_gig.shtml)

  Hide contents

Britney Spears' £5m gig

She plans one-off spectacular in Las Vegas

By Rav Singh

TROUBLED pop star Britney Spears is in secret talks for a spectacular comeback worth a whopping £5MILLION.

2505_britney_01.jpgThe Gimme More singer, 26, is poised to get a lot more with a mega-bucks one-off Las Vegas show, followed by a string of dates.

A success could see the Princess of Pop put behind her a disastrous year that included losing her two sons to ex Kevin Federline.

READ: Pap rat lured Britneu Spears with Brummie dirty talk

READ: Britney in split writ

READ: I dread the call telling me she's killed our children

READ: Mad, bad, sad world of Britney

Our source confirmed: "The concert will be one to top them all—a spectacle.

"It will have jaw-dropping lights, amazing costumes and a performance from Britney to roll back the years."

Britney, whose last UK No1 was in 2004, will play the gig at Palms Hotel And Casino in Las Vegas at the end of the year. Her record company, Sony BMG, have given the thumbs-up despite Britney's shambolic comeback at the MTV Video Music Awards last year.

The source added: "There's a total of £5million on offer but the onus is on Brit to put in a top show.

"Britney is finally getting her life—and career —back on track and the whole world will see the evidence when she steps on that stage

 

yeah, but these articles are from 2008, when the cship had already been placed, but I remember reading an article from, it must've been 2007, when she was still with Sam Lutfi, and that she was seeking where to have a series of shows.

(The article I just read it like 3 weeks ago though, but I don't remember if it was shared in here or I found it somewhere else) 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

We noticed you're using an ad blocker  :ehum_britney_um_unsure_confused_what:

Thanks for visiting Exhale! Your support is greatly appreciated 💜  

Exhale survives through advertising revenue. Please, disable your ad block extension to help us and continue browsing Exhale. 🙏

I've disabled ad block