Jump to content

Britney’s EOS lip balm commercial+ MAke me mv


stateofgracebritney

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Dirk said:

but she doesn't know how to read a script before being glamorous with little clothes on heading to a bed with a guy? :badthoughts:

And about the sponsor: It's easy to shoot an extra film with her putting her lipstick or whatever instead of just scrap everything.

We know that she was screaming with LaChapelle when they were filming inside that yellow truck. And idk, maybe that part was scrapped and everything fell out of place, it was a big mess tbh. 

 

LMAO THIS VIDEO:

 

I'm still convinced something happened between Britney and David that led to the video being scrapped. 

Link to comment
  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Super Mods
7 hours ago, Lilith said:

Most likely they just didn't like the video or there was an issue with the products placement.

Also Britney has done worse **** in her videos and even in public, her dad is not going to care lmfa0. He knows what her job is since like 20 years now already. He is not going to give a **** or even care enough to check the scenes of the mv :cackling: even if he sees it so what? Britney has done worse. Make Me is pretty tame in comparison. and quite boring too. :cackling:

Yeah you got a point there. I still think it’s better than what we got with Randee, Radar is boring but I watched that more than with the official make me video. 

Link to comment
6 hours ago, Mystic Womaney said:

This is the dancer that she put an insta up about getting sushi with after filming the video?

 

theres only a handful of videos that don’t have someone she hooked up with/ dated/ currently dated it’s a bit awks when you think about it.

but she should have learnt by now not to hook up with colleagues - maybe wait till the job is done - like Sam. :sipney:

yeah that one

Link to comment
7 hours ago, PokemonSpears said:

I think the real problem here is not that it got scrapped, is why did she have to do that other video? :beynah:

Just the hall scenes, something like the American Dream version would've fine, boring, yes, but it would've been seen as more artistic and not as cringy as a bunch of women auditioning young guys doing ridiculous things.

I couldn’t said it better myself:yesplease:

Link to comment
7 hours ago, Mystic Womaney said:

Yes! This is who I meant!

his names willie? Gimme more info. I assummed they dated but I don’t even know his name. What I do you know?

No, no-- the sushi mention made me think of Willie Gomez, so I was wondering if it was the guy pictured or Willie she went to eat sushi with. I think it was this guy, however. But I don't know his name. :(

Link to comment
13 hours ago, Steel Magnolia said:

If anything, the original version by David Lachapelle would have made fun of the sponsors.

David is a true artist, and I can't imagine him being happy to find out that his work of art had to feature product placements.

The situation reminds me of the Banksy painting that shredded itself after the buyer had already purchased it at auction. I imagine David's treatment of Eos and Orangetheory Fitness was probably the same.

Granted that we didn’t see the whole video, but we did see the Orangetheory and EOS placements. Why is everyone acting like we didn’t?

she applies the chapstick while looking at a toaster and the TV plays the ad before she throws it at the window.

i think your idea is interesting, but we did see some of the placement

Link to comment
24 minutes ago, studlygeorge said:

Granted that we didn’t see the whole video, but we did see the Orangetheory and EOS placements. Why is everyone acting like we didn’t?

she applies the chapstick while looking at a toaster and the TV plays the ad before she throws it at the window.

i think your idea is interesting, but we did see some of the placement

We never saw the actual plot of the video.

We're missing an intro, an ending...a story arch.

Link to comment
8 hours ago, fucknfurter said:

No, no-- the sushi mention made me think of Willie Gomez, so I was wondering if it was the guy pictured or Willie she went to eat sushi with. I think it was this guy, however. But I don't know his name. :(

Yeah this is the guy I meant because then a few pics later they’re eating sushi and it 100% is this same man because you can see the neck tattoo

we need someone to help!

Link to comment
5 hours ago, Mystic Womaney said:

Yeah this is the guy I meant because then a few pics later they’re eating sushi and it 100% is this same man because you can see the neck tattoo

we need someone to help!

Someone posted  his name is Austin. They went out together and he started posting about it. 

Britney even mixed him up with Sam a few times in interviews. 

Link to comment
On 11/23/2018 at 5:29 PM, Dirk said:

but she doesn't know how to read a script before being glamorous with little clothes on heading to a bed with a guy? :badthoughts:

And about the sponsor: It's easy to shoot an extra film with her putting her lipstick or whatever instead of just scrap everything.

We know that she was screaming with LaChapelle when they were filming inside that yellow truck. And idk, maybe that part was scrapped and everything fell out of place, it was a big mess tbh. 

 

LMAO THIS VIDEO:

 

OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Another puzzlepiece! never even heard of this!!!!

Link to comment
51 minutes ago, Steel Magnolia said:

I did a google and the only britney and him thing I could find was an old exhale thread :cuteidk:

and it said he replied to someone on here’s DM saying it was scrapped because she was unhappy with G-Easy’s scene where he apparently had *** with her and followed by screenshots of a body double doing it so she didn’t actually know that’s what was in the MV and maybe changes were not agreed. (The argument on the thread was why still use the same clips in the new vid when they could have then, but clearly the director refused to change it) 

idk what to believe but what I do now question is how the snaps of her an Austin are still on her insta when she normally deletes all association. So if she didn’t want to give him credit or confirmation they’d worked together I’d have done that...

i originallt felt he was why it was scrapped. After today and the research and exhale always being the only source to information on the internet (only one page of searches come up for Austin Kellogg’s Britney Spears) then I don’t think he spread it online as it’s not anywhere. Evidence of creative differences is actually a lot more evident and i actually believe team britney this time.

Link to comment
On 11/23/2018 at 10:54 AM, Scrappy said:

Personally, the whole thing was degrading and I don't see the reason folks here keep harping on how amazing it was when it was like a cheap, dirty porno version of Slave dreamed up by shriveled up old farts. 

 

On 11/23/2018 at 11:13 AM, BabyBabyBay said:

For real - the original video is really not that good :jlostare:

You are right it’s  so gross. I never saw the original Mv but it’s just straight **** and filth. Nothing to do with the song or even have a resemblance of a plot. 

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

We noticed you're using an ad blocker  :ehum_britney_um_unsure_confused_what:

Thanks for visiting Exhale! Your support is greatly appreciated 💜  

Exhale survives through advertising revenue. Please, disable your ad block extension to help us and continue browsing Exhale. 🙏

I've disabled ad block