news #FREEBRITNEY | Britney’s Gram Received Worrying Voicemail Regarding Britney

[ifuseekamy_]

Ok I really hate to keep posting Sams allegations but they have given us some of our best info so far, but take this with a grain of salt. I don’t know if this has been posted but could explain some of what happened in court if it’s true. I don’t think I’ve seen it shared here  

 

[3isacharm]

1 hour ago, PokemonSpears said:

I was many pages behind, and thought Rebellion had leaked by now, but while I was reading the part about Lutfi's cds, I played Womanizer and noticed it has a new thumbnail on Youtube

  Hide contents

 

Well, here it looks the same, but in the search it shows a different picture

weird

 

 

they changed all the video thumbnails a while back

[Meaner03]

8 minutes ago, ifuseekamy_ said:

Ok I really hate to keep posting Sams allegations but they have given us some of our best info so far, but take this with a grain of salt. I don’t know if this has been posted but could explain some of what happened in court if it’s true. I don’t think I’ve seen it shared here  

 

We should go back to court document and see what Samuel Ingham says about meeting Britney in those documents .  The whole process was anyway sketchy 

[Puppy]

18 minutes ago, Meaner03 said:

Her family and friends are the most likely people able to fight the c-ship, better yet they can hire the lawyer of their choice to do so .  Thing is none of them did

Well the girls of the podcast said the paralegal told them siblings tried and failed and have given up. It’s that bad. 

[Body ache]

22 minutes ago, summer2summer said:

God , now she's playing the "superior , calm and collected" type . Im no psychologist , but that's the behaviour of an EXCELLENT deciever. She's basically trying to turn the table on US . By making us look like the "crazy fandom with conspiracy theories" . 

Now, i think it's best if we attack but swifly. Don't name call or anything , guys . This is phase two , we need to gather more evidence , she's running on damage control her and Britnry's team , lawyers are being called and scenarios are put in place as we speak . 

 

Also notice how she didn't deny anything or bring up Britney's name in fear of slipping up.

[IndieBritFan]

Holy **** Sam slay me

[ifuseekamy_]

11 minutes ago, Meaner03 said:

 We should go back to court document and see what Samuel Ingham says about meeting Britney in those documents .  The whole process was anyway sketchy 

working on that but for now I found this article https://www.thefix.com/content/britney-spears-sam-lutfi90684 written by Carmela Kelly again. Every single point she has made makes so much sense it's kind of eery. I think she knew exactly what was going on, it seems to agree with what Sam is saying also. Everyone went to such lengths to make sure Britnay wouldn't ever testify against Sam even though he fought for her to be in court, which would only make sense if he knew she was going to tell the truth that she reached out for his help 

[Catalin]

23 minutes ago, ifuseekamy_ said:

Ok I really hate to keep posting Sams allegations but they have given us some of our best info so far, but take this with a grain of salt. I don’t know if this has been posted but could explain some of what happened in court if it’s true. I don’t think I’ve seen it shared here  

 

So much dirt...God...

[3isacharm]

Britney's so smart by making sure we catch how they took away her smartphone and they gave her a f**king flip phone from 1999

they're trying so hard to keep her out of the loop. 

 

[Catalin]

What happened to @britneystruth? I kind of loved that Twitter account.

[lilhennythings]

3 hours ago, Meaner03 said:

So i found the carmela kelly's contact (the journalist behind this site) i sent her an email, and asked her if she would be interested to have an e-mail interview with us that we could publish here . Crossing my fingers that she will get it and accept it .  It could be really interesting knowing how she investigated this case and the sources she had .

I hope you get a response. Her digging into this is wild. Here's a comment she left responding to a comment on one of her posts, the one about TMZ's fabricated shopping spree:

Hi, Daria. I have lots of questions.

Why would anyone believe Harvey Levin at this point? He’s lost credibility to me over the year. For example, I read a story that Britney is going to the crazy side and that she’s been showing signs of craziness through her frantic, compulsive shopping. I make a few calls and find out it isn’t so and that Harvey’s tale is false.

About permanent c-ship.

There’s no motion to terminate. There’s no “continuing” what a judge has ruled to be permanent: no more regularly scheduled conservatorship reviews.

We were told by the media that Britney could terminate it at any time. So… it’s permanent from the sense of reviewing the c-ship to see whether to continue it or make other arrangements.

I would like to see someone who doesn’t have a monetary interest in Britney be the one to determine capacity. How can Britney have a voice when her court-appointed voice continues to have a job that rewards him to be “without capacity?”

Why in 2008 and 2009 did various lawyers from the conservatorship continue to use a ruling from Feb. 4, 2008 to prevent Britney from either hiring her own attorney and/or to testify in a court of law?

It was b.s. that her defense lawyer, Michael Flanagan, asked her dad “during the proceedings” if he would allow her to testify during the driver’s license case. That was a sham as court records reveal. I have signed documents as well as the actual court transcript “from the proceedings.”

Which lawyer involved in the conservatorship would talk to the likes of Harvey Levin about such a sensitive matter as someone’s mental health and what the plans are?

Harvey’s site is loaded with ads and Britney had been a gold maker for TMZ since its inception. Google Harvey and CNN transcripts and you will find him saying so repeatedly. He could drag out this c-ship thing over this year which I guess is what he intends to do. He got all of our hits to his site and generated ad revenue by being near the only one to breathe any trace of information regarding the conservatorship or Britney’s mental health.

There are still enough nuts out there to disbelieve my interview with two witnesses from the boutique where Britney was shopping was mislead because the sales assistants saw an opportunity to build business for the store? Those nuts want to believe and willingly promote across the blogosphere that Britney could snap at any time.

Ultimately it’s up to your own observation about TMZ to determine who might be telling the truth.

I’ve been researching and writing an article to expose or prove the lack of a court appointed investigator looking in on Britney and being able to talk to her without her being intimidated or influenced by anyone. Those conservatees that are under professional, trained and certified fiduciaries are visited once a year by a court appointed investigator. What about Britney?

Being manipulated by the media is a large part of why I began this column. I wanted to know the truth and I wanted to know if she was okay.

We’re in to what appears to be four attorneys she has tried to hire now. Blair Berk herself testified in April that Britney was constantly asking her why she couldn’t represent her and Berk old her to see her psychiatrist and that she should listen and talk to Sam Ingham. In short Berk admitted that Britney complained about her both to her and to others.

I think the public would be happier if information came from sources outside of the tabloid world. Harvey can pretend to walk among us as an ethical journalist but he is not simply because he doesn’t uphold the truth or hold others who are in power accountable. He’s a tabloid journalist and so is his team of writers. He could try to sue me for libel in saying that but he would fail. Also, if he did try that I could expose him for everyone to see: my articles are easily fact checked. TMZ by the way is only the tip of it. They just never had anyone dog them before quite like this in so public a case: a worldwide superstar.

--

No matter how you slice it, it's hard to deny something going on.

 

[ThisMeowBiteback]

16 minutes ago, lilhennythings said:

I hope you get a response. Her digging into this is wild. Here's a comment she left responding to a comment on one of her posts, the one about TMZ's fabricated shopping spree:

Hi, Daria. I have lots of questions.

Why would anyone believe Harvey Levin at this point? He’s lost credibility to me over the year. For example, I read a story that Britney is going to the crazy side and that she’s been showing signs of craziness through her frantic, compulsive shopping. I make a few calls and find out it isn’t so and that Harvey’s tale is false.

About permanent c-ship.

There’s no motion to terminate. There’s no “continuing” what a judge has ruled to be permanent: no more regularly scheduled conservatorship reviews.

We were told by the media that Britney could terminate it at any time. So… it’s permanent from the sense of reviewing the c-ship to see whether to continue it or make other arrangements.

I would like to see someone who doesn’t have a monetary interest in Britney be the one to determine capacity. How can Britney have a voice when her court-appointed voice continues to have a job that rewards him to be “without capacity?”

Why in 2008 and 2009 did various lawyers from the conservatorship continue to use a ruling from Feb. 4, 2008 to prevent Britney from either hiring her own attorney and/or to testify in a court of law?

It was b.s. that her defense lawyer, Michael Flanagan, asked her dad “during the proceedings” if he would allow her to testify during the driver’s license case. That was a sham as court records reveal. I have signed documents as well as the actual court transcript “from the proceedings.”

Which lawyer involved in the conservatorship would talk to the likes of Harvey Levin about such a sensitive matter as someone’s mental health and what the plans are?

Harvey’s site is loaded with ads and Britney had been a gold maker for TMZ since its inception. Google Harvey and CNN transcripts and you will find him saying so repeatedly. He could drag out this c-ship thing over this year which I guess is what he intends to do. He got all of our hits to his site and generated ad revenue by being near the only one to breathe any trace of information regarding the conservatorship or Britney’s mental health.

There are still enough nuts out there to disbelieve my interview with two witnesses from the boutique where Britney was shopping was mislead because the sales assistants saw an opportunity to build business for the store? Those nuts want to believe and willingly promote across the blogosphere that Britney could snap at any time.

Ultimately it’s up to your own observation about TMZ to determine who might be telling the truth.

I’ve been researching and writing an article to expose or prove the lack of a court appointed investigator looking in on Britney and being able to talk to her without her being intimidated or influenced by anyone. Those conservatees that are under professional, trained and certified fiduciaries are visited once a year by a court appointed investigator. What about Britney?

Being manipulated by the media is a large part of why I began this column. I wanted to know the truth and I wanted to know if she was okay.

We’re in to what appears to be four attorneys she has tried to hire now. Blair Berk herself testified in April that Britney was constantly asking her why she couldn’t represent her and Berk old her to see her psychiatrist and that she should listen and talk to Sam Ingham. In short Berk admitted that Britney complained about her both to her and to others.

I think the public would be happier if information came from sources outside of the tabloid world. Harvey can pretend to walk among us as an ethical journalist but he is not simply because he doesn’t uphold the truth or hold others who are in power accountable. He’s a tabloid journalist and so is his team of writers. He could try to sue me for libel in saying that but he would fail. Also, if he did try that I could expose him for everyone to see: my articles are easily fact checked. TMZ by the way is only the tip of it. They just never had anyone dog them before quite like this in so public a case: a worldwide superstar.

--

No matter how you slice it, it's hard to deny something going on.

 

Man this is crazy!!

[jokobish]

48 minutes ago, ifuseekamy_ said:

Ok I really hate to keep posting Sams allegations but they have given us some of our best info so far, but take this with a grain of salt. I don’t know if this has been posted but could explain some of what happened in court if it’s true. I don’t think I’ve seen it shared here  

 

Why’s no one asking Sam how Britney was acting when they were recently in a room together for the lawsuit??????? I find it interesting he hasn’t brought any info on that up

[BKSTYL3]

Leaving this here again: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1tBGhSgx_F5YiPaDuktzKX2aOL6EBCZHW

(follow the comments an added the MTV News article has been added as a PDF to submit where it states Scamual D. Ingham only spent less than 15 minutes with her. Other court documents attached.)

 

Let me know added suggestions that can be added

[ILikeChillinWithYou]

Hey everyone! 

I will be posting a quick summary of every 50 pages in the main #FreeBritney thread. This is for easy access and for those who came late or cannot keep up with the main thread, or for those who forgot and wanted to know what happened 50 pages ago. I'll try my best to update every 50 pages and if I cannot, I apologise in advance. I will try to make sure that all the information provided are correct. But please feel free to tell me your suggestions or if the narrative was wrong somewhere along the posts.

[ifuseekamy_]

28 minutes ago, lilhennythings said:

I hope you get a response. Her digging into this is wild. Here's a comment she left responding to a comment on one of her posts, the one about TMZ's fabricated shopping spree:

Hi, Daria. I have lots of questions.

Why would anyone believe Harvey Levin at this point? He’s lost credibility to me over the year. For example, I read a story that Britney is going to the crazy side and that she’s been showing signs of craziness through her frantic, compulsive shopping. I make a few calls and find out it isn’t so and that Harvey’s tale is false.

About permanent c-ship.

There’s no motion to terminate. There’s no “continuing” what a judge has ruled to be permanent: no more regularly scheduled conservatorship reviews.

We were told by the media that Britney could terminate it at any time. So… it’s permanent from the sense of reviewing the c-ship to see whether to continue it or make other arrangements.

I would like to see someone who doesn’t have a monetary interest in Britney be the one to determine capacity. How can Britney have a voice when her court-appointed voice continues to have a job that rewards him to be “without capacity?”

Why in 2008 and 2009 did various lawyers from the conservatorship continue to use a ruling from Feb. 4, 2008 to prevent Britney from either hiring her own attorney and/or to testify in a court of law?

It was b.s. that her defense lawyer, Michael Flanagan, asked her dad “during the proceedings” if he would allow her to testify during the driver’s license case. That was a sham as court records reveal. I have signed documents as well as the actual court transcript “from the proceedings.”

Which lawyer involved in the conservatorship would talk to the likes of Harvey Levin about such a sensitive matter as someone’s mental health and what the plans are?

Harvey’s site is loaded with ads and Britney had been a gold maker for TMZ since its inception. Google Harvey and CNN transcripts and you will find him saying so repeatedly. He could drag out this c-ship thing over this year which I guess is what he intends to do. He got all of our hits to his site and generated ad revenue by being near the only one to breathe any trace of information regarding the conservatorship or Britney’s mental health.

There are still enough nuts out there to disbelieve my interview with two witnesses from the boutique where Britney was shopping was mislead because the sales assistants saw an opportunity to build business for the store? Those nuts want to believe and willingly promote across the blogosphere that Britney could snap at any time.

Ultimately it’s up to your own observation about TMZ to determine who might be telling the truth.

I’ve been researching and writing an article to expose or prove the lack of a court appointed investigator looking in on Britney and being able to talk to her without her being intimidated or influenced by anyone. Those conservatees that are under professional, trained and certified fiduciaries are visited once a year by a court appointed investigator. What about Britney?

Being manipulated by the media is a large part of why I began this column. I wanted to know the truth and I wanted to know if she was okay.

We’re in to what appears to be four attorneys she has tried to hire now. Blair Berk herself testified in April that Britney was constantly asking her why she couldn’t represent her and Berk old her to see her psychiatrist and that she should listen and talk to Sam Ingham. In short Berk admitted that Britney complained about her both to her and to others.

I think the public would be happier if information came from sources outside of the tabloid world. Harvey can pretend to walk among us as an ethical journalist but he is not simply because he doesn’t uphold the truth or hold others who are in power accountable. He’s a tabloid journalist and so is his team of writers. He could try to sue me for libel in saying that but he would fail. Also, if he did try that I could expose him for everyone to see: my articles are easily fact checked. TMZ by the way is only the tip of it. They just never had anyone dog them before quite like this in so public a case: a worldwide superstar.

--

No matter how you slice it, it's hard to deny something going on.

  

omg SIS knew the facts at the very beginning. What she says does somewhat correlate with what Sam is saying. He said that Britney never met with Ingham because she had hired her own lawyer and turned Ingham away and never spoke to him, as far as he knew(I assume up until 2009 at some point) When Ingham went to court he testified she didn't have the capacity to hire counsel, Dr. Spar cooperated this in the legal doc saying she doesn't have the ability to attend the hearing. THESE TWO TAUGHT FREAKING SEMINARS TOGETHER WITH THE JUDGE. Carmela Kelly says that they used his 'evaluation' of Britney from 2008 in both the 2008 and 2009 proceedings. How is that fair? How would NO ONE question that she hadn't been reevaluated a year later? This whole case disgusts me

Here's the doc by the way: https://ll-media.extratv.com/archive/images/news/0207spearspdf.pdf  go call the governor. 

We ALL let Britney down. My biggest fear is that she'll never get out of this. We have to raise SO much hell. 

[ThisMeowBiteback]

10 minutes ago, ifuseekamy_ said:

omg SIS knew the facts at the very beginning. What she says does somewhat correlate with what Sam is saying. He said that Britney never met with Ingham because she had hired her own lawyer and turned Ingham away and never spoke to him, as far as he knew(I assume up until 2009 at some point) When Ingham went to court he testified she didn't have the capacity to hire counsel, Dr. Spar cooperated this in the legal doc saying she doesn't have the ability to attend the hearing. THESE TWO TAUGHT FREAKING SEMINARS TOGETHER WITH THE JUDGE. Carmela Kelly says that they used his 'evaluation' of Britney from 2008 in both the 2008 and 2009 proceedings. How is that fair? How would NO ONE question that she hadn't been reevaluated a year later? This whole case disgusts me

Here's the doc by the way: https://ll-media.extratv.com/archive/images/news/0207spearspdf.pdf  go call the governor. 

We ALL let Britney down. My biggest fear is that she'll never get out of this. We have to raise SO much hell. 

We did she was cheated at life!! The only thing I can think of is sending all this too lifetime movie network & hope they do a documentary like they did with rKelly 

 

https://www.aenetworks.com/contact 

 

i wonderful if someone can come up with a short essay as to why they need to do a documentary/investigation on this, we all can copy & past it to the contact website I have above 

[maquisl]

1 hour ago, Meaner03 said:

We should go back to court document and see what Samuel Ingham says about meeting Britney in those documents .  The whole process was anyway sketchy 

Those docs were already posted here and we talked about Ingham. I can't remember in which page obviously  But maybe they were uploaded to the drive.

He basically said that she was't capable to hire her own lawyer. He decided that in less than days. 

22 minutes ago, BKSTYL3 said:

Leaving this here again: https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1DuNCzMipOo_oLz75N1WnNX8MsG-jtLBu

 

[LostInAnImage]

Your summaries are amazing (and highly entertaining). Thanks for all the hard work! 

[Forever22]

This whole c- ship is corrupt!!!! 

Keep going army! Expose them ALL