Britney went off on Jamie Lynn: "Why is she even talking about me unless she wants to sell a book at my expense?"

[Speed X]

2 minutes ago, leviathan said:

 

So it’s Cassie who reads BH and not Britney 

[idontgare]

21 minutes ago, MikeMasi said:

She appeared to really appreciate it at the show 

she wasn’t going to throw a fit on camera at the award show..she has always been professional in a work setting. award shows, tv appearences/interviews, red carpets etc etc. she has been a celebrity since the age of 17. Britney knows how to put on a strong face. I’m sure the more she thought about it, the more it bothered her. Little digs/things like Jamie Lynn’s performance can seem so huge when you’re going through something that traumatic. 

[ElectricPlatypusLove]

My own rant:

 

SO many security guards are shady AF. 

I mentioned it a bit here--- a dear friend of mine became very ill this year. She drank herself to liver disease at just 32 years of age. The liver disease causes dimentia-like symptoms. She hired a security company (she is a trust fund kid in Los Angeles) because she feared her family coming to her home and causing her stress which would lead her to relapse (she had stopped drinking since she now had progressed to liver cerrhosis) but she then began paying a security guard on the side to bring her ***** and alcohol. This security guard has now defected from the company she hired him through. He works exclusively for her, is imbezzling all her money, and keeping her isolated from her loved ones and intoxicated 

[Oprah Winfrey.]

3 minutes ago, KrisJ said:

Here’s the “remix” thing explained (got this from ATRL but I feel like it’s captured it quite well):

once the conservatorship was in place she was no longer allowed to have creative control over her shows as she once did. Right before the conservatorship was put in place, Britney did a mini “tour” if you could even call it that called the M+Ms tour. The entire show was like 30 minutes long and they were announced literally right before the show was about to start so it was pretty much just for fans in the know and they were at small venues. They were 100% Britney’s shows with little outside influence. I’m almost certain that Britney is saying that she wanted to continue to do these style of shows were she could pick the set list, outfits, etc. on the fly without having so much oversight from planners but the conservatorship wouldn’t let her and just kept forcing her to perform the same songs for 4 years with 0 change in the songs themselves being that they were just the exact track she released in 1998 or whatever. Then she saw Jamie Lynn do basically what she had been asking to do and it upset her because JL literally does nothing except leech off Britney’s work.

Im sadden by all this but as a fan oooh I love this tea about the m+m tour, I’ve always been very intrigued by that part of her life

[BritneyLVR]

28 minutes ago, David Rose said:

Like....why does she keep mentioning this? Correct me if I'm wrong, but from what I remember of Jamie Lynn's tribute at the Radio Disney thing, it was just a bunch of young Disney kids singing covers of her songs. I don't remember them sounding particularly different or "remixed," they just sounded like they put their own vocal spins on the songs. If they were remixed, it wasn't anything significantly different sounding. Also, why would Britney take this as some personal slight as if Jamie Lynn had anything to do with it? It's just odd. Of all the things JL spoke about, the knife incident, etc, why does she keep harping on this nonsensical remix crap? I feel like all of Britney's tours in recent years have been full of remixes.

BTW I'm not defending JL at all here, she has done plenty of things wrong that she should answer for. I'm purely just having trouble understanding Britney's rants, which feel more like severely disconnected streams of thought that are difficult to follow.

Something must have happened in regards to that tribute/Jamie Line 

[BreatheForBritney]

i see some ppl defending the security guard. but the problem was his sarcastic tone towards her, from whom he earns money. not whether or not it is his job. Also, any decent person would try to help her such as redirecting to someone else of a more appropriate role. 

[Oprah Winfrey.]

2 minutes ago, Cinderella85 said:

What?

What part about her being forced into a rehab  and to take medication, and iud she didn’t want do you not understand?

poor thing god knows what else could’ve happened she had no control over her body.

[BlackoutITZ]

12 minutes ago, 3IsACharm33 said:

Uhh wtf are you saying, she’s a free woman right, she nots a child no one should Be legally liable for her to the point they can tell their BOSS who is very sick NOOOOOOO?! I mean she could’ve died!!

is that not at all maddening to you guys????

im becoming very sadden with this fandom and the Gullibility of many of its members…

i mean I’m Gen z I joined this mess I suppose… but the overall since of awareness or not even that. It just seems like you guys have always believed what was fed to you and now look! 
 

like that’s the reason team con was able to rake in so much cash and keep this mess going. Like honestly the fans should’ve boycotted the femme fatale tour y’all saw what was happening…

Many of you are in your 30s nowand it’s like you don’t question anything…im not try to shade here just report what I’m seeing.

we already know Britney was in a rough situation so it shouldn’t be hard to see/believe that things haven’t changed very much for her.

Its time we say it-#Britneyisnotfree

I'm sorry but you are not looking at this rationally. You say that nobody should be legally liable for her, but the fact of the matter is... they are. That's nothing to do with a conservatorship or not being free, it's because she is a superstar. You aren't being realistic. She will never have a normal life by ordinary standards. Even without a conservatorship, it's likely that she will never be in public or at home without security guards for the rest of her life. That's the reality of being a star of her stature.

I appreciate that you worry for her, and I understand it given everything that has happened in the past. But in some situations, it seems that fans are still looking for something that isn't there. A security guard not being able to leave her has nothing to do with her being a free woman. Britney hiring a security firm to guard her means they are liable for her

The security guard being rude or sarcastic to her is a different story, and that is not acceptable

[Steel Magnolia]

29 minutes ago, Busybee said:

Understandable but it doesn't belong on twitter for what? Like whats the reasoning behind that? To please the general public? At this point nothing they can say will be any worse than what they already have.  I just have a hard time understanding the need to have her keep a good image. That ship has sailed a long time ago. She is who she is and if that turns out to be someone that fans don't like then so be it. They have to make a choice to continue to support her or not.

Because he's a human being, too, and doesn't need to be embarrassed in front of his boss, co-workers, and 55.7 million followers?

[Brave New Girl.]

What perplexed me is she said she wanted remixes but said she would never ask for it. No shade or anything but how are you gonna get it then. 

[Oprah Winfrey.]

1 minute ago, BreatheForBritney said:

i see some ppl defending the security guard. but the problem was his sarcastic tone towards her, from whom he earns money. not whether or not it is his job. Also, any decent person would try to help her such as redirecting to someone else of a more appropriate role. 

[David Rose]

Just now, Serenity Rain said:

What perplexed me is she said she wanted remixes but would never ask for it. No shade or anything but how are you gonna get it then. 

Her shows are littered with remixes though. Practically every song is remixed. None of this makes any sense to me.

[Steel Magnolia]

29 minutes ago, Electric said:

But their client aka Britney aka the guy’s boss was THE ONE who asked to leave the house. Why would he be fired in this case? It’s not like the security guy went out clubbing on his own. 

Legal liability.

What would happen if there was an intruder or fire while he left?

He'd be sued, along with the security company he works for.

The entire purpose of security is to secure the premises...Especially when a pharmacy can deliver.

[Busybee]

Just now, Steel Magnolia said:

Because he's a human being, too, and doesn't need to be embarrassed in front of his boss, co-workers, and 55.7 million followers?

Nobody knows who he is though. Did I miss something? Did she mention him by name?

I'm sure she has several security that switches out one person doesn't work for her 24/7 so no one knows who's she is talking about it.

[Body ache]

I don't get it. Is she not free? Ins't the security team working for her? Also that was something typical that I expect JL to say. She seems the type to divert the blame from herself.

[Oprah Winfrey.]

7 minutes ago, ElectricPlatypusLove said:

My own rant:

 

SO many security guards are shady AF. 

I mentioned it a bit here--- a dear friend of mine became very ill this year. She drank herself to liver disease at just 32 years of age. The liver disease causes dimentia-like symptoms. She hired a security company (she is a trust fund kid in Los Angeles) because she feared her family coming to her home and causing her stress which would lead her to relapse (she had stopped drinking since she now had progressed to liver cerrhosis) but she then began paying a security guard on the side to bring her ***** and alcohol. This security guard has now defected from the company she hired him through. He works exclusively for her, is imbezzling all her money, and keeping her isolated from her loved ones and intoxicated 

That’s sad, and if that’s the case for Britney currently then it seems like much hasn’t changed in her life

[Isla]

The stuff about her security guard is actually quite worrying. I’m glad Sam got her medicine in the end but if she was that ill surely he could have helped her? I hope Britney feels better soon.

[Steel Magnolia]

1 minute ago, Busybee said:

Nobody knows who he is though. Did I miss something? Did she mention him by name?

I'm sure she has several security that switches out one person doesn't work for her 24/7 so no one knows who's she is talking about it.

You know damned well half the fanbase will track him down, post his name, and invade his privacy.

As they do with everyone else who they perceive to have done her wrong. 

[AlfredIslas]

Britney wasn't her best self when she reacted that way towards the security guard but people have to understand that she had a fever and she's still learning how the world works after the conservatorship. I'm not sure she fully understood that he can't leave his job and the security guard himself probably wasn't understanding of the fact Britney was very sheltered and shut off from things.

[Body ache]

13 minutes ago, Serenity Rain said:

I thought that too. It’s not his job to be the assistant. Vicky where you at girl?

He could have at least assisted her in ordering one from a delivery site.