So Jordan can get in trouble for quoting Love, but FX can create an entire documentary? Does that mean this is team con approved? Or are they unwilling to attempt scare tactics on a big network because there is no merit in litigation?

[GlitterSlayDExhaleHI]

This is odd to me. Side note, I am VERY excited for this. But can you imagine if there is a bait and switch and they justify the conservatorship and this is all one big plan to get the public off their backs? 

[(You Drive Chris) Crazy]

In my opinion, Team Con has gone after people who literally have little to no legal representation, they have bullied people into silence more or less because they know the limits to their power litigation wise. With Jordan (and I don’t know Jordan and I’m not trying to be presumptive) it’s quite possible they see Jordan as an easier target because he’s one person at the end of the day. As ****ed up as that is, of course. Though we have all seen how resilient Jordan has been with the attempts from Jamie etc, Jordan still seems to prevail in the end. But I even think it’s tough for Jordan and his platforms to be as vocal about the current situation with Britney. 
 

With this documentary, it presents an ENTIRELY never before seen opportunity to expose the Conservatorship by bringing it to a platform that is extremely hard to take down honestly. FX, which is owned by Disney, has ultimately one of the largest and most powerful legal teams representing them in the world. Paired up with the New York Times, I do feel like they are more or less unstoppable no matter how many pathetic countless threats Jamie and the Conservatorship team try to serve the folks associated to this piece of journalism. Honestly, I think they are presenting this with big “try and come for us” energy because for once, this game of chess will be entirely unmatched for Jamie. I think this is going to be huge, and very pro-free Britney. 

[JP9101]

6 minutes ago, (You Drive Chris) Crazy said:

In my opinion, Team Con has gone after people who literally have little to no legal representation, they have bullied people into silence more or less because they know the limits to their power litigation wise. With Jordan (and I don’t know Jordan and I’m not trying to be presumptive) it’s quite possible they see Jordan as an easier target because he’s one person at the end of the day. As ****ed up as that is, of course. Though we have all seen how resilient Jordan has been with the attempts from Jamie etc, Jordan still seems to prevail in the end. But I even think it’s tough for Jordan and his platforms to be as vocal about the current situation with Britney. 
 

With this documentary, it presents an ENTIRELY never before seen opportunity to expose the Conservatorship by bringing it to a platform that is extremely hard to take down honestly. FX, which is owned by Disney, has ultimately one of the largest and most powerful legal teams representing them in the world. Paired up with the New York Times, I do feel like they are more or less unstoppable no matter how many pathetic countless threats Jamie and the Conservatorship team try to serve the folks associated to this piece of journalism. Honestly, I think they are presenting this with big “try and come for us” energy because for once, this game of chess will be entirely unmatched for Jamie. I think this is going to be huge, and very pro-free Britney. 

Hope you right sis 

[Forever222]

Lou Taylor vs NYT? She wouldn’t have the guts. They have money and would happily go through discovery to get her. 
 

 

[Goten21]

girl... Look at what you're asking. Lou is powerful but it's the New York Times. It literally dates back to 1850. This is a dynasty. Lou can't touch them

[PZHSB]

Lou nor Jamie have the kind of money it would take to go up against fx or the times. They pick on the weaker links. 

[jennyj]

Lou and Larry are not involved anymore, so that could be part of it.  But even if they were, they can't go against a mega corp like NYT lol.

[PokemonSpears]

they're probably making sure not to name any of them besides her father, and still use the legal words as "allegedly"

[PickleSpears]

A good doc is objective and shows all sides. A single person is usually subjective. I don't know what the doc says and I don't really know what Jordan said but maybe that's the differene.

[s&m]

They only sue people without resources 

[Isla]

NYT are a big organisation... vs Jordan (no offence). She’s just going for the one person who she thinks is an easier target. 

[ThisMeowBiteback]

Britney is a public figure anybody can do this, that’s why Lifetime do biopics of celebs all the time, they don’t need the consent of the public figure if they want too

[jokobish]

I’m nervous about this too.. because Jamie has a lot of ties with so many people .. o hope it’s in favor of Britney though 

[ColdAsFire88]

So I agree, but I am pretty sure anyone can threaten to sue anyone for defamation. If the person or publication that is reporting on the defamation lacks evidence to support the “statements” made then that person or publication is in jeopardy, so they need legal back up. 

 

I am pretty NYT has done their due diligence and has evidence to support any claims made. 

I’d like to add that the Courtney Love interview with allegations against Lou are still online 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.unilad.co.uk/celebrity/courtney-love-says-britney-spears-manager-almost-killed-her-and-kurt-cobains-daughter/amp/

 

[G-unit]

I really think it has a lot to do with what they were trying to do in court...unseal a lot of stuff so as to not have this “family secret” hidden away in the closet and to make it more public.  

[AmyIsMyDrunkAlterEgo]

I have some hope because near the end of the trailer there is a fellow Britney stan, @LeanneSimmons, "why is her dad making all of her decisions?" part. She has been heavily involved in the movement + @FreeBritneyLA for quite some time and also attended the court hearings. This gives me hope only because I remember we DM'd briefly about a topic and then I saw her at the latest hearing FBritneyLA online rally and she came on after the court hearing and reported her notes (they couldn't have their phones inside).

She is a great person/fan (with credibility) and I am just hoping they don't plug her as the "Crazy Britney Fan" if it is team-con 

[AmyIsMyDrunkAlterEgo]

3 hours ago, ThisMeowBiteback said:

Britney is a public figure anybody can do this, that’s why Lifetime do biopics of celebs all the time, they don’t need the consent of the public figure if they want too

Never forget Britney Ever After

[Guest]

2 hours ago, ColdAsFire88 said:

So I agree, but I am pretty sure anyone can threaten to sue anyone for defamation. If the person or publication that is reporting on the defamation lacks evidence to support the “statements” made then that person or publication is in jeopardy, so they need legal back up. 

 

I am pretty NYT has done their due diligence and has evidence to support any claims made. 

I’d like to add that the Courtney Love interview with allegations against Lou are still online 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.unilad.co.uk/celebrity/courtney-love-says-britney-spears-manager-almost-killed-her-and-kurt-cobains-daughter/amp/

 

Courtney also never deleted her comment against Loucifer on her Instagram post. 

[Spicechinodiva]

Given,  how Jordan Miller was used by her father in 2009, He lost that one..

 

But, Jamie did win the court case against Anthony Ello, but I did notice they do after fans who create fan websites and blogs in order to silence them. 

 

While Jordan never got silenced,  Anthony did however,  to the point. 

 

He isn't a fan of Britney anymore saying that court case has PTSD for him, he doesn't hate her. But, he can't listen to her music without anger being in the forefront.

 

FYI, Anthony was forced to sell his Britney website as conditions of the court victory for Jamie. 

[Melina]

8 hours ago, (You Drive Chris) Crazy said:

In my opinion, Team Con has gone after people who literally have little to no legal representation, they have bullied people into silence more or less because they know the limits to their power litigation wise. With Jordan (and I don’t know Jordan and I’m not trying to be presumptive) it’s quite possible they see Jordan as an easier target because he’s one person at the end of the day. As ****ed up as that is, of course. Though we have all seen how resilient Jordan has been with the attempts from Jamie etc, Jordan still seems to prevail in the end. But I even think it’s tough for Jordan and his platforms to be as vocal about the current situation with Britney. 
 

With this documentary, it presents an ENTIRELY never before seen opportunity to expose the Conservatorship by bringing it to a platform that is extremely hard to take down honestly. FX, which is owned by Disney, has ultimately one of the largest and most powerful legal teams representing them in the world. Paired up with the New York Times, I do feel like they are more or less unstoppable no matter how many pathetic countless threats Jamie and the Conservatorship team try to serve the folks associated to this piece of journalism. Honestly, I think they are presenting this with big “try and come for us” energy because for once, this game of chess will be entirely unmatched for Jamie. I think this is going to be huge, and very pro-free Britney. 

Disney fighting back for its Mousketeer