Jump to content

Lou Taylor asks Judge not to look at Britney's accounting & denies bugging Britney’s room or mishandling her finances - Rosengart demands Tri-Star hand over important accounting documents NOW


Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Forever222 said:

Frustratingly she is right that accounting has ben approved by both Sam Ingham and the court for 11 years. 

I hope this is way they can get Sam Ingham, he is right up there with LT as being the reason this conservatorship exists.

 

 

If they misled the court about anything, though, that won't get them off the hook. In eleven years of accounting, there is bound to be something.

  • Love 1
  • Like 6
Link to comment
8 hours ago, Prachi said:

Lou Taylor just filed legal docs asking the judge in Britney's conservatorship case to stop Mathew Rosengart from having full access to accounting reports related to the conservatorship because she feels he should not be allowed to go back that far. 

Taylor says her company Tri Star submitted regular accounting reports without any objection from Britney over the 11 years Taylor was involved. However, we know Britney was kept in the dark about what was going on in relation to her finances hence why she didn't object. Jamie Spears was running the show and in cahoots with Taylor. The court deemed Britney incompetent and couldn't hire her own legal defense up until recently. Certainly shoe could not hire a professional to look into the accounting during those years.

Rosengart has reason to believe Britney's money was mismanaged and he's getting to the bottom of it. He sent a letter to Tri Star this week demanding they hand over important documents. Rosengart says he's tried for six weeks to get Tri Star to send him the total amount of fees Tri Star has taken from Britney since 2008. He says, "Tri Star's ongoing failure to answer this question speaks volumes and leads to the unfortunate and inexorable conclusion that Tri Star has much to hide."

Britney's reported networth is around $60 million. Sources familiar with the situation believe it should be at least 2-3 times that. 

Taylor is also denying having any role in Britney's home and bedroom allegedly being secretly surveilled, TMZ reports.

Taylor's employee / Britney's former assistant, Robin Greenhill, submitted a declaration saying "No one at Tri Star is aware of any hidden electronic surveillance device placed in Ms. Spears' bedroom." She goes on to say, "No one at Tri Star has ever had any control over Ms. Spears' medical treatment."

Robin has been seen on-camera managing Britney's social media and calendar (including offering for Britney to work on her birthday). There are reports Robin also had control whether Britney could go on vacation and spend her own money the way she wanted to. 

If Lou Taylor has nothing to hide, why not allow Rosengart free reign over the books? 🤔 

 

Reporting by @Jordan Millerlt-tm.jpg.1e6f9477deff07e57b85a060aa195f67.jpg

Does anyone have a link to the latest court docs from Lou and Robin?

Link to comment
9 hours ago, dfffff said:

If I were in Judge Penny's shoes and I got a petition like this one where Lou is asking to stop investigating 13 years of Britney abuse. I would never allow that to happen because making that request would just reassure me that there are big criminals and an investigation is necessary!

Well, but I'm not a judge, and the uncorrupt Brenda Penny will probably agree to Lou's requests.:oprah_well_there_you_have_it_proof_see_hand:

The bazillionth reason this is wrong, accounting “mistakes” have been uncovered by Britney Swat Team. That is sufficient to warrant a full audit. 
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=HOghbBqRrxU

Does anyone know how accounting audits in conservatorship court works? Does the court even have the power to stop an accounting audit? Shouldn’t the court have a duty to the IRS to ensure factual accounting?

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment

According to the LA Times investigation into 1000s of probate abuse cases, the judges don't investigate, just rubber-stamp due to high case load, laziness etc.

Even in smaller cases with less paperwork.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.latimes.com/news/la-me-conserve14nov14-story.html%3f_amp=true (some quotes below).

(Another article in the series https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.latimes.com/local/la-me-conserve13nov13-story.html%3f_amp=true )

" A Times examination of more than 2,400 conservatorship cases since 1997 found that judges frequently overlooked incompetence, neglect and outright theft"

"In most cases, evidence of these abuses was in the courts’ own files."

"The real problem is sloth, taking the easy way,” said Marc Hankin, a Los Angeles attorney who helped write laws on elder abuse.

“The last thing the judge wants to do is make a decision.”

Probate judges say that they do their best, but that the courts are swamped with cases and short of staff.

"Yet the culture of the probate courts, stuck in an earlier era, reflexively grants conservators the benefit of the doubt.

They are assumed to be acting in their clients’ best interests — in some cases even when their own filings with the court suggest otherwise."

"If no one complains, the court isn’t out there to investigate,” said retired Judge Robert Letteau, who supervised probate courts in Santa Monica and downtown Los Angeles from 1995 to 2002. “If stuff’s being stolen, misappropriated, we wouldn’t know about it.”

  • Like 3
Link to comment
33 minutes ago, OneLife said:

If the judge agrees to Lou Taylor's request it will be a big problem.. I hope the judge understands she's hiding something!!

Oh the judge understands. The point is, fpr this to have happened for more than a decade, there is negligence, to say the least, and corruption, to call it mildly. How far will the judge exercise her powet to protect a corrupt and rotten system is the question. It's a question because this case is incredibly public. Otherwise, I am sure, she would be burying this just like she and Goetz did the last 12 years. 

  • Like 7
Link to comment
5 hours ago, James101 said:

I’m more worried that they will or have destroyed a lot of the evidence. Since they had so much time to move things around since things kept getting Delayed. Also if it wasn’t for the public eye I Guarantee Britney would’ve been denied her own lawyer again like she has been all these years. We came so far Britney Spears Crying GIF

Todays Digital age will show some sort of paper trail . Look at what the surprise witness found . I am sure there is more . Snow White Do Not Want GIF

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Leave a comment!

Not so fast! Did you know you can post now and register later? If you are already a member of Exhale, sign in here and start posting!
If you are not logged in, your post will need to be manually approved by an Exhale moderator before it's visible to everyone.

Guest
Tap to reply!

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

We noticed you're using an ad blocker  :ehum_britney_um_unsure_confused_what:

Thanks for visiting Exhale! Your support is greatly appreciated 💜  

Exhale survives through advertising revenue. Please, disable your ad block extension to help us and continue browsing Exhale. 🙏

I've disabled ad block