Were Britney's legs highly photoshoped in Work *****?

[Michaelgiftos]

 She worked (out) *****

[GemmaTeller]

I cant @ people saying you cant edit this or that in a video. I mean look at what everyone and their grandma can do with filters on snapchat to a moving image. You can make your nose slimmer, swap faces, etc. Just think of what a professional with high tech software and a high budget can do. Anything. Yes the Work ***** video was edited. It looked good though, it wasn't overdone.

[Curious_1110]

18 minutes ago, floopy22 said:

No, it does not. You do know that is a music video and that's not a real software, right? That video is done using CGI and with a fairly high budget.

There isn't software that is intelligent enough to realistically swap someones hair or paint make up on moving eyes in real time.

I know it's not the exact science, but it kinda breaks down the concept of videos that are edited frame by frame. I know in that particular instance they shot that scene several times under different lighting ect. and pieced it together in post production. It was only being used to show how seamless it can look in final product. I should've made that clear 

[Ofcoursenot]

9 hours ago, Oxic said:

edited on Pretty Girls too, and Slumber Party I think  <- the stomach

I thought that it was PS too! but yes, she is just sucking her stomach in

[Ofcoursenot]

But this is nothing new... since HIAM they edit her body 

[floopy22]

11 minutes ago, GemmaTeller said:

I cant @ people saying you cant edit this or that in a video. I mean look at what everyone and their grandma can do with filters on snapchat to a moving image. You can make your nose slimmer, swap faces, etc. Just think of what a professional with high tech software and a high budget can do. Anything. Yes the Work ***** video was edited. It looked good though, it wasn't overdone.

And you think the SnapChat effects look good and realistic, huh? There is no similar features in "high tech" software. Everything is mostly manual in professional software such as After Effects. There is not a make thinner button or make nose smaller button. And you have to possibly film the shot with green screen. In videos you will see warp and blur effects mainly because they are easier and cheaper than having to use CGI.

10 minutes ago, Curious_1110 said:

I know it's not the exact science, but it kinda breaks down the concept of videos that are edited frame by frame. I know in that particular instance they shot that scene several times under different lighting ect. and pieced it together in post production. It was only being used to show how seamless it can look in final product. I should've made that clear 

My point is it does not fit into a budget of a normal music video to do editing like that because it is not as easy as the video makes it appear. You either take your entire budget and do a video like hers, or you do one with nice sets, expensive fashion, makeup artists, choreographers, backup dancers etc.

[Curious_1110]

12 minutes ago, floopy22 said:

And you think the SnapChat effects look good and realistic, huh? There is no similar features in "high tech" software. Everything is mostly manual in professional software such as After Effects. There is not a make thinner button or make nose smaller button. And you have to possibly film the shot with green screen. In videos you will see warp and blur effects mainly because they are easier and cheaper than having to use CGI.

My point is it does not fit into a budget of a normal music video to do editing like that because it is not as easy as the video makes it appear. You either take your entire budget and do a video like hers, or you do one with nice sets, expensive fashion, makeup artists, choreographers, backup dancers etc.

Okay, thanks for clarifying I always thought they edited frame by frame to add definition to abs and slim people down ect

[Seel]

6 hours ago, Curious_1110 said:

http://jezebel.com/singer-gets-a-major-photoshop-makeover-in-music-video-1505054990

This shows how easy it is to photoshop a video

Not easy like that. It's just made for the music video.

[Oxic]

3 hours ago, RedBloodedWoman said:

She was obviously sucking her stomach in... mess.

oh well. still, some of the scenes of sp are edited (blurry britney's face)

[December02]

Yeah, she was definitely edited. This si really evident on piece of me as well. I can imagine Womanizer did quite a bit as well even though she was so in shape. It's sad but she's a product and they want the product to look professional so they do it. To be honest though gimme more or pretty girls would have been distractingly obvious that she had gained weight, especially considering the outfits she was in. Slumber party had some editing done- i mean look at her legs on the remix EP cover. I think the difference though is that in SP they probably didn't need to make her much thinner- I think they just cleared up her skin. She's really fit. 

[Spearsfan]

It's shopped and camera angle. 

[Puppy]

Hey at least its not as bad as Beyonce. Her videos are edited to the max. I saw a demo reel by a company and her video was one of them and her big thighs shrunk drastically. All singers ger this treatment. 

[PieceofBritney]

16 hours ago, Ofcoursenot said:

I thought that it was PS too! but yes, she is just sucking her stomach in

I was gonna say this. Because she is also dancing so she is breathing differently...

[Rachel Green]

On 11/1/2017 at 0:07 PM, Seel said:

You want more? 

Funny cause there were moments she was really fit in 07'

[glorified.ho]

32 minutes ago, Rachel Green said:

Funny cause there were moments she was really fit in 07'

Exactly!!!

 

 

 

 

[britneysslumberparty]

On 1/11/2017 at 4:54 AM, HenryEvans said:

 

Slim effect and the camera is far away so it just seems like it

but she was photoshopped too, I remember the news but the difference is little.

 

i think she looks better in the first one tbh 

[Seel]

3 hours ago, morango said:

Exactly!!!

 

 

 

 

I undertand that you want to deny these photos. But she was not that fit at that time.

[glorified.ho]

9 hours ago, Seel said:

I undertand that you want to deny these photos. But she was not that fit at that time.

You are right... I checked the date of the pictures where she's fit... they were taken on May, during the M+M Tours. The video was recorded on July... she gained weight during these months, since her life was a huge a mess... to me, she still looked good  

[Rachel Green]

9 hours ago, Seel said:

I undertand that you want to deny these photos. But she was not that fit at that time.

Exactly. It's funny because she was in a better shape in a good part of 07' and she gained weight just around this time

[Draw The Blinds]

I can see a little photoshop on the tummy, who wouldn't want that tbh 

But why would they change her legs? They definitely made them smaller, but there was no need. She has amazing legs