Lou Taylor's motion to quash subpoena to testify is pushed back

[blackingouthenegativity]

1 hour ago, samwoods321 said:

Why bother, all these demons will drag this to the bitter end, she's free. Let it go 

Because they stole 13 years of Britney’s life as well as her money!
 

Justice needs to be served to be a check on these rich ********* who let greed rule over everything. 

[Tar_isa]

8 minutes ago, s&m said:

It was not needed for me to respond because a user just responded earlier 

“

In July, we should have had as many as 3 hearings on B's case. But as I understand it, the hearing concerning LMT, which was originally scheduled for July 23(if I remember it right), was postponed to July 27. So now we will only have two hearings in July

 

Edit: here’s the original schedule: July 13 - Tri Star motion to quash, July 20 - Lynne’s fees, July 27 - All other fees

So the hearing about Tri Star motion to quashwas postponed to July 27 from July 13, not 23”

Ok then, thank you .

I think we got it mixed up because of the "Non-Appearance Case Review" title and the "No appearances" later on, plus the fact that the 13th July date doesn't appear anywhere in the document.

I think it's easy to get things mixed up and yes, even sometimes not fully grasp the whole info in the comments, so  I'm sorry if you felt I or others were making **** up just for the sake of conspiracying, because that isn't the case.

[Stefani]

Justice must be served. 

[Headed Peckerhead]

10 minutes ago, Stefani said:

Justice must be served. 

By assumption.... They can't get away with it, and further fill their egos that between them all they are so ''PROUD to also continue to break the law regardless''. No matter how many years it takes, but SHE DESERVES and NEEDS JUSTICE, to find peace. 🏳🤍

[RebellionSparkles]

18 minutes ago, Tar_isa said:

Ok then, thank you .

I think we got it mixed up because of the "Non-Appearance Case Review" title and the "No appearances" later on, plus the fact that the 13th July date doesn't appear anywhere in the document.

I think it's easy to get things mixed up and yes, even sometimes not fully grasp the whole info in the comments, so  I'm sorry if you felt I or others were making **** up just for the sake of conspiracying, because that isn't the case.

You are the best 😍

[RebellionSparkles]

32 minutes ago, s&m said:

It was not needed for me to respond because a user just responded earlier 

“

In July, we should have had as many as 3 hearings on B's case. But as I understand it, the hearing concerning LMT, which was originally scheduled for July 23(if I remember it right), was postponed to July 27. So now we will only have two hearings in July

 

Edit: here’s the original schedule: July 13 - Tri Star motion to quash, July 20 - Lynne’s fees, July 27 - All other fees

So the hearing about Tri Star motion to quashwas postponed to July 27 from July 13, not 23”

 

21 minutes ago, Tar_isa said:

Ok then, thank you .

I think we got it mixed up because of the "Non-Appearance Case Review" title and the "No appearances" later on, plus the fact that the 13th July date doesn't appear anywhere in the document.

I think it's easy to get things mixed up and yes, even sometimes not fully grasp the whole info in the comments, so  I'm sorry if you felt I or others were making **** up just for the sake of conspiracying, because that isn't the case.

Dear RosenZaddy

please leak the calendar of deadlines, depos, and court hearings bc the Stanley Mosk court’s flop organization is causing confusion and messiness on Exhale threads. I know your biggest priority after getting Justice for B is preventing messiness on Exhale. Thank you in advance for prioritizing this pressing issue.

😆

[Steel Magnolia]

6 minutes ago, RebellionSparkles said:

 

Dear RosenZaddy

please leak the calendar of deadlines, depos, and court hearings bc the Stanley Mosk court’s flop organization is causing confusion and messiness on Exhale threads. I know your biggest priority after getting Justice for B is preventing messiness on Exhale. Thank you in advance for prioritizing this pressing issue.

😆

[blissfuloutsider]

they keep showing their guilt.. this may be good, keep burying yourself you dumb thieving evil *****es..

[Nicole0502]

Aren’t you legally supposed to be held in contempt of court if you don’t show up under a subpoena..?

[queenofhearts]

8 hours ago, Lmfc1993 said:

I've got the feeling that they try to push back anything, and that make them look guilty. 

exactly. this is the perfect example of  "tell me you're guilty without telling me you're guilty". Any other business professional would have the sense to try to clear their name if they were innocent

[queenofhearts]

7 hours ago, RebellionSparkles said:

They’re never going to testify bc it will just hurt their case and prob implicate other powerful people who were part of the CONs crimes.

Lou never hands over the docs. This is her business model. The same exact thing happened in the WEG lawsuit.

Lou made her business on the accounting equivalent of helping clients hide the dead bodies. Her accounting claims are boldly OUTRAGEOUS. But bc laws exist, you have to audit her books to prove wrongdoing…but she never hands over the books. I guess Lou is saying here that she rather the punishment from sanctions than the punishment from handing over whatever evidence she has.

what do you mean by punishment from sanctions?