Search the Community

Rosengart sent a letter to Weingarten on March 2 and brought up the allegations against Weingarten by women who said he had bullied/***ually harassed them.

Related:

Jamie Spears filed an appeal, demanding Britney sit for a deposition and answer the allegations she's made about her conservatorship case despite the judge previously ruling she shouldn't have to. According to legal docs obtained by TMZ, Jamie says it's unfair the court ruled he had to sit for a deposition while Britney can get away without having to sit for one. The docs state, "The right to take a deposition can rarely be denied. In California, discovery is a matter of right." Jamie's legal team also argues Britney and her attorney, Mathew Rosengart, did not establish good cause to justify prohibiting her deposition ... especially given the fact she made countless claims against Jamie for wrongdoing. Jamie says if the court had an issue with Britney's deposition, it could have limited the topics or questions covered ... but instead, it just shut her deposition down altogether. Jamie's legal team says the one-sidedness in the trial judge's ruling violates basic fairness ... that if one party has to sit for a depo, the other party should as well. The trial judge ruled whatever Jamie wanted from Britney could be obtained through writing. His legal team clearly feels that could apply to him as well, and now they're gunning for equal treatment -- he sits for a depo, then she should as well.

Britney Spears’ dad Jamie has rushed back to the court objecting to the pop star’s use of an ex-FBI special agent in their court battle, RadarOnline has learned. As RadarOnlinepreviously reported, earlier this year, Spears’ powerhouse lawyer Mathew Rosengart submitted a declaration by a former FBI agent named Sherine Abadi. Abadi works for the investigative firm, Kroll Associates Inc. In the declaration, Abadi corroborated the claim that Spears’ father Jamie had spied on her during his time in charge of her conservatorship. She said Jamie, “engaged in and directed others to engage in unconscionable violations of [Britney’s] privacy and civil liberties.” Abadi noted that her findings “raise criminal implications” for Spears’ father. The declaration was used as part of Rosengart’s motion accusing Jamie of taking more than $6 million from Spears’ estate and using “his role as conservator to further his own personal and business interests.” The former FBI special agent reached her findings after speaking to Alex Vlasov, who worked for a security firm hired by Jamie. He revealed the team was instructed to put listening devices in Spears’ bedroom and monitor her text and phone calls. The report read, “The Black Box employee who placed the secret device in [Britney’s] bedroom explained to Mr. Vlasov that he did so by duct-taping it behind furniture so it could not be seen and that he added a separate battery pack to the recording device to permit continuous recording for a longer period of time.” Vlasov accused Jamie of reading Spears’ messages between 2016 and 2018. In his new motion, Jamie said the entire testimony should be stuck because it is “inadmissible.” His lawyer argued the declaration “violates Jamie’s due process rights” and “serves no proper or legitimate purpose.” Ebadi has no personal knowledge of the “facts” contained in the declaration. Ebadi instead relies on inadmissible hearsay to compensate for her lack of personal knowledge,” Jamie’s lawyer added. “But, Ebadi had zero involvement with Britney at any relevant point.” Jamie demanded Abadi’s testimony be stuck immediately. A judge has yet to rule.

So as per Tweet : Little birdies 🕊told us K-Fed was paid off by Jamie Spears to do this coordinated PR push to take down Britney. It’s not going to work 🚫 And I really believe it !

This should be in the headlines.

Judge Brenda Penny on Wednesday ruled that Britney Spears will not have to sit for questioning from Jamie Spears's team in a major win for the singer. Her father's legal team had previously requested that she be deposed, but the judge determined it would be unlikely to produce relevant, first-hand information related to ongoing petitions in the case. Alex Weingarten, an attorney for Jamie, said in court on Wednesday that Jamie Spears "did right by his daughter." "The truth will come out and he will be vindicated," Weingarten said of Jamie Spears. "He did this for – not to – her, to protect her from Rasputins and Svengalis." Jamie Spears has long argued that he took control of his daughter's life in order to protect her physical, emotional, mental, and financial health. But in the months since the conservatorship was ended, Britney has railed against the arrangement, accusing her father of a slew of abuses, which he has denied. During the Wednesday hearing, the lawyers also bickered over a ruling that would have provided Jamie Spears's legal team with his daughter's home address. The singer's team opposed the ruling, arguing that it was irrelevant and an "intrusion of privacy," especially in the aftermath of a stalking incident at Britney's June wedding, during which her ex-husband of 55 hours, Jason Alexander, attempted to crash her wedding carrying a knife. Jamie Spears's team had argued that they needed the address after alleging that Britney's counsel was signing documents on her behalf while she was out of town. 🔴SOURCE : INSIDER

Alex Weingarten aka sloppy Joe stated to E! Online 🙄 https://www.eonline.com/news/1338019/judge-orders-britney-spears-dad-jamie-must-sit-for-deposition-and-hand-over-surveillance-records?content=organic&cmpid=social&medium=link-post&source=twitter-enews

This how I *think* Jamie and Lou met… Around the same time 2004/2005, Lou Taylor connected with Jamie Spears and Ron Artest. 2005: Ron Artest signs with Lou Taylor and starts playing for the Sacramento Kings, which is owned by the billionaire Maloof family. https://twitter.com/mx_defying/status/1543451685900750850?s=21&t=3IOsWvFOXnlkyzdrZCmi7w 2001: Jamie met the Maloofs through Larry Rudolph around 2001 and the Maloofs sent Jamie to chef school. Video. 2004: Britney gets married to Kevin and parts ways with Larry Rudolph. Larry goes to work with the Maloof Entertainment Company. Larry Rudolph and the Maloofs have worked on many businesses together Sunset Tan Studio at the Palms 2006: Jamie Spears started doing business with the Maloofs. This includes Palms Home Poker Stars in 2006 and the Maloof Money Cup. 2006: Jamie Spears is on Spears Management Inc paperwork with Lou Taylor. The paperwork shows that Jamie Spears is Jason Alexander's neighbor. 2008: Britney is out with George Maloof. 2009: Ron Artest and Lamar Odom play for the Lakers. Ron introduces Khloe Kardashian to Lamar Odom. Lamar and Khloe get married at Irving Azoff's house 2011: The Maloofs stay close to Ron Artest. 2012: The Spears family has stayed close to the Maloofs, including Alli Sims. 2004-2008: CLEARLY, while Britney was becoming/being a mom: Jamie, Lou, Larry and the Maloofs were all working together.

According to Jamie Lynn Britney bought a house for Lynne on the condition that she divorce her father. Lynne agreed but lied to Britney and didn't divorce him at the time, Jamie lived in that house since day one according to Jamie Lynn and he didn't want to live there because Britney paid for the house. What do you think about that?

Jamie Spears continues to bully, humiliate and harass Britney. He filed a motion to compel Britney to sit for a deposition (despite Britney having to endure years of his abuse). Interestingly, Jamie has avoided Mathew Rosengart's requests to participate in a deposition of his own, which would address fiduciary mismanagement, secretly surveilling Britney in her home and more. Jamie says he'll agree to sit for a deposition, but only if Britney does. The court docs read: "Britney continues to make public social media posts containing incendiary allegations of various factual matters. Britney's knowledge and testimony regarding the allegations in her pleadings, the statements her lawyers have made on her behalf in public court filings, and the matters she has posted to social media concerning those same allegations and statements are fair, reasonable and appropriate topics for deposition." Once again, Jamie is trying to control what his estranged daughter does, refuses to let her be free, and won't cooperate. Thumb cred

Is it who we think it is? Seen @/britneysgram

Lou Taylor said in her demand letter she had nothing to do with the planning or creation of the conservatorship and wasn't hired until a year after it was put in place. Below is video footage of Lou with Jamie Spears on February 4th, 2008, around the time the conservatorship was put in place. Someone needs to send these videos to Sam Ingham Related:

So on Friday Vivien filed a new document on Jamie's behalf. Skip Ads by × Basically,they want to focus on termination instead of removal/suspension. And ask court to order all parties to meditate regarding accountings matters that should be resolved before CONservatorship ends in their opinion. And they **** Jodi as well 😅🤠😅

Jamie Spears, Britney Spears’ father and conservator of her estate, made headlines last week with a court filing that said he would agree to step down as conservator as part of an “orderly transition.” But lost in the hubbub was a key fact: The petition, filed last Thursday, actually asks the judge to deny the pop singer’s July 26 petition to get her father out of her business. Last week’s document was “not itself a petition for acceptance of his own resignation,” said attorney Matthew Kanin, who is of counsel with the national law firm Greenspoon Marder and a certified specialist in estate, trust and probate law. “It’s actually an objection to being removed from the conservatorship.” Jamie Spears’ filing argues that he needs to stay around at least until approval of the so-called Twelfth Account — financials from the year 2019 — is complete, along with a final accounting of the estate up to whatever date he would step down. However, according to Kanin, that argument is a load of bunk. Jamie Spears easily could wrap up those loose ends. Kanin said, without keeping his conservator title — or the money that comes with it. “The court can make an order removing or suspending or accepting resignation of the conservator of an estate, and still order that person to finalize their accounting before they are finally discharged,” the lawyer said. “So they could remain under the jurisdiction of the court and subject to court orders, subject to contempt of court if they don’t comply with orders, even after their responsibilities have been terminated.” The new petition, filed by attorney Vivian Thoreen of Holland & Knight, also defended Jamie’s performance as conservator, explained that there was no reason to remove him under conservatorship law and stated that Britney was asking for something that wasn’t in her best interests. All in all, it was a nearly complete rejection of what Britney said she wants, which is freedom from her father at age 39. The July 26 filing from Team Britney asked that the singer’s father be removed and replaced by an interim fiduciary, Jason Rubin of Certified Strategies Inc. (That request was followed by another one asking that the removal hearing be expedited, which the court denied early last week.) One point of concern: The accounting matters described in the court document can take years to resolve, as they are not a high priority for the court, Kanin said. The initial Twelfth Account of 20`19 finances wasn’t even filed until August 2020, and it has yet to be finalized. And those accountings are likely to be telling, as Britney Spears’ conservatorship is run differently than most where a parent is the conservator. “In the vast majority of parental conservatorships, the parents don’t get paid to be conservators,” said Harry Nelson, a healthcare attorney and founder and managing partner of L.A. law firm Nelson Hardiman. Nelson, who specializes in the rights of conservatees, said that in his opinion, “The level of payment in this case has been extreme.” Jamie Spears has been getting $16,000 a month since 2009, plus monthly office costs and a percentage of the gross revenues from Britney Spears’ tours and multiyear Las Vegas residency, the July 26 filing said. And if the singer’s father uses attorneys — which he does quite often — their time is paid for out of his daughter’s money. Those bills have, in the past, run into the millions. “Although it is common for managers, agents, and other industry professionals to receive a percentage of an artist’s earnings, Mr. Spears is none of those. He is a conservator and, as a conservator, his role is to be burdened by, rather than benefit from, the conservatorship,” the filing said. “Mr. Spears is not a professional business or financial manager.” Worth noting is that Britney appears to have pulled back on the desire she expressed in court June 23 for an immediate end to the entire conservatorship, which has been in place since early 2008. “In the abstract, it seems like she’s [now] taking a measured approach of saying, ‘Well, what I really want is for the conservatorship to go away,’” Kanin said. “‘But if I can’t get that, or if I can’t get that yet, then at least I want to be rid of my father and have someone who I chose to be the conservator.’” As a member of the panel of people who become court-appointed counsel, Kanin has litigated cases like this one — albeit not as complex or high-profile — on behalf of conservatees. “Generally speaking,” he said, “the courts are fairly deferential if the person chosen is qualified.” Jamie Spears’ objection is likely to be considered, along with several other petitions, on Sept. 29, the date of the next scheduled conservatorship hearing. https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/music/story/2021-08-16/britney-spears-jamie-spears-fighting-removal-as-conservator

This is all so sad and it makes me so angry…He never loved her, all he has ever seen in his daughter are dollar signs.

I’ve seen here only the TMZ version of the public statement by Britney’s lawyer. Here’s a longer one where he starts by thanking her. Everything I’ve heard about his statements in the court gives me chills. Here’s there to really fight for her. I believe that having a fatherly figure like him to fight for her will be a healing experience for Britney, too. His request for Jamie to step down was a genius move - that would be the fastest and easiest way to get rid of him. Even though Jamie’s initial reaction was to resist Rosengart’s request, I wouldn’t be surprised if additional negotiations between Rosengart and Jamie’s lawyers would result him finally resigning as Britney’s conservator. Another thing that stood out for me was the report that when he was asked what he thought of Jodi’s request for extra security, he declined to answer before he had talked about it with Britney. Someone commented that Ingham wouldn’t have done so. It was also such amazing power move in the court to remind everyone why they were there – not to argue who did what but to decide what’s Britney’s best for her. Him pointing out that the conservatorship was probably unnecessary to begin with makes me wonder if he tries to have it somehow annulled. Someone was disappointed that he didn’t immediately petition to end the conservatorship. It’s because he wasn’t fully authorized to do that yet – there is (was) still some paperwork to do, but he made it clear that he is going to get move ahead to end the conservatorship ASAP. I also liked that he mentioned the whole team behind him working for Britney. I’m sure that together they can dig up much faster the various crimes committed in the past 13 years. There was a rumor of him or his company reaching out to experts in human trafficking (?) or some similar human rights violation, too. I can’t find it now, but it made me think that they’ll take this case to a whole new battle field where none of the other lawyers are comfortable or even competent. I am looking forward seeing how the Knight Mathew will slay all the ugly dragons suffocating our beautiful princess Britney. 😀