Jump to content

Putting Pressure on RCA


monalisaney81

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 26
  • Created
  • Last Reply
6 hours ago, puppylo16 said:

that wasn't the begining of her public rebellion. She's always been rebellious from the very start she told David to lock the door after Larry shut down their lolita vision. Before you say she was manipulated by Lachappelle, he has asked her before hand about it and he saw it in her eyes that she totally get what he was going for and liked the idea of playing it up which went against her management and label's vision of a wholesome american girl. Nigel **** recalled that Britney wanted to tie her shirt up halfway into filming the dancehall scene because the shirt kept getting untucked, restricting her arms and generally just too hot compared when she wears sports bras during rehearsals. He said that everyone had a field day over it because it would break continuity in editing ( you can still see they still use shots of her with the shirt tucked like it originally intended) that low angle wide shot was his only shot he had of her with the shirt tied up and he had to beg his team to do this one more take for safety in case in editing the earlier shots wouldn''t work with the subtle shirt change. His camera man told him that he can do a wide shot and follow her way faster than having to reset every and relight everything for a wide shot hence why it was lit weirdly because someone was holding the light as the camera guy followed Britney and the dancers performing down the hall. 

 

But Oops Director (who also directed BOMT and Crazy) said that her team and label wanted her to wear too **** outfit and he felt uncomfortable with that.. He saw that Britney didn't want to wear that too and he spoke up about it, went with Britney in bus or smth to change and Brit choose that white one (in second verse).  After that he was never asked for video direction (they got mad af I think). So in the oops era they want her naked lol and Britney didn't - hope there was a guy to help her at that moment (she was really too young)..

you can listen it here - its' really great they did it and is shown Britneys deeper side that we all knew:

https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/britney-spears-20th-anniversary-oops-i-did-it-again-new-podcast-1006112/

 

about topic:

I think it's a good idea.. they have a huge part in controlling her.. still mad about "original doll":rihit:

Link to comment

RCA need to support Britney. Of course all they see is money and business deals. But they need to show support to a free Britney. It’s ridiculous that the c-ship and rca continually

live in the past and relive iconic moments when Britney was actually FREE and her essence created success. Jamie/ Lou and co are toxic. They need to go and are in the way of any possibility of future projects. 

Link to comment

RCA is a multimillion dollar company with hundreds of people on their roster. A few thousand people not listening to Britney isn’t going to do anything. 

Ill continue supporting Britney’s music. Her artistic output. 

No matter what rights they take away from her, they will NEVER take away her legacy. NEVER take away her talent. 

Link to comment
12 hours ago, puppylo16 said:

that wasn't the begining of her public rebellion. She's always been rebellious from the very start she told David to lock the door after Larry shut down their lolita vision. Before you say she was manipulated by Lachappelle, he has asked her before hand about it and he saw it in her eyes that she totally get what he was going for and liked the idea of playing it up which went against her management and label's vision of a wholesome american girl. Nigel **** recalled that Britney wanted to tie her shirt up halfway into filming the dancehall scene because the shirt kept getting untucked, restricting her arms and generally just too hot compared when she wears sports bras during rehearsals. He said that everyone had a field day over it because it would break continuity in editing ( you can still see they still use shots of her with the shirt tucked like it originally intended) that low angle wide shot was his only shot he had of her with the shirt tied up and he had to beg his team to do this one more take for safety in case in editing the earlier shots wouldn''t work with the subtle shirt change. His camera man told him that he can do a wide shot and follow her way faster than having to reset every and relight everything for a wide shot hence why it was lit weirdly because someone was holding the light as the camera guy followed Britney and the dancers performing down the hall. 

 

Britney had her moments from early on but her real rebellion didn’t start until she married Jason Alexander. Everything else from their was a public statement. The David Lachapelle shoot was a behind the scenes act. She went public and never turned back. It was stunt after stunt. Mona Lisa was next, KFed, Original Doll, 2007/08 rebellion against her image/brand and media, VMAs, ect. 

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

We noticed you're using an ad blocker  :ehum_britney_um_unsure_confused_what:

Thanks for visiting Exhale! Your support is greatly appreciated 💜  

Exhale survives through advertising revenue. Please, disable your ad block extension to help us and continue browsing Exhale. 🙏

I've disabled ad block