Jump to content

🚨 Ventura County Considered Opening a Human-Trafficking Investigation into Team Con in 2021 but Samuel Ingham (and apparently Britney) Declined


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Daniela.tomasseli said:

When is Sam Ingham going to be held accountable?

Can he still he prosecuted or no? Some people say no but I want to believe he still can.

According to Christopher Melcher anybody can except for the judge and the court itself. So all the judges in this case have judicial immunity. It traces back to Medieval times and how you can't go against a kingdom or establishment. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
On 10/19/2022 at 7:03 PM, Lola2790 said:

What did he say?

it's in the unsealing motion, he essentially argues that Britney's counsel failed to deal a certain set of documents on different dates, or gave his reason, but essentially refers to Britney's counsel on several occasion. This could be passing the blame or trying to invite ingham to response to further delay matters.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
On 10/19/2022 at 3:07 PM, Lola2790 said:

According to Christopher Melcher anybody can except for the judge and the court itself. So all the judges in this case have judicial immunity. It traces back to Medieval times and how you can't go against a kingdom or establishment. 

What a breeding ground for top-down corruption!

Link to comment
On 10/20/2022 at 3:07 AM, Lola2790 said:

According to Christopher Melcher anybody can except for the judge and the court itself. So all the judges in this case have judicial immunity. It traces back to Medieval times and how you can't go against a kingdom or establishment. 

So what recourse does the state have against a judge who refuses to recuse him/herself from a case when s/he should?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
On 10/20/2022 at 3:12 AM, Kletus said:

Ingham didn’t read Britney her rights, according to Britney. He also didn’t reject a single request made by team con, so ingham is complicit :holduplisten_hold_up_listen_preach_telling_wisdom_wise:

The problem is proving that, and then compelling the judge to agree it matters.

Link to comment

Leave a comment!

Not so fast! Did you know you can post now and register later? If you are already a member of Exhale, sign in here and start posting!
If you are not logged in, your post will need to be manually approved by an Exhale moderator before it's visible to everyone.

Guest
Tap to reply!

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Ă—
Ă—
  • Create New...

We noticed you're using an ad blocker  :ehum_britney_um_unsure_confused_what:

Thanks for visiting Exhale! Your support is greatly appreciated 💜  

Exhale survives through advertising revenue. Please, disable your ad block extension to help us and continue browsing Exhale. 🙏

I've disabled ad block