Britney Could Make $28M A Month If She Joins OnlyFans! 💵👙

[KrisJ]

33 minutes ago, GODNA IS A QUEEN said:

Sis this has nothing to do with gender. A pop music legend and pop culture icon like Britney Spears stooping down to making an OnlyFans would only cheapen her brand and image, so yes it is beneath her. Doesn’t matter if it’s male or female. Justin Timberlake. Bieber. Beyonce. Eminem. Gaga, etc. Bonafide music icons shouldn’t have to stoop to that level, especially considering that OnlyFans is usually meant to give a platform for those who are either financially struggling or for TikTok/Twitter/social media stars who want to bring in extra income or gain more traction. Music icons are above that. Like I can’t believe some of you are this delusional.

Thank you! Imagine Beyoncè doing “only fans” - Britney is above, past and beyond stooping to Onlyfans trash. 

[Cqleb]

1 hour ago, Phonography423 said:

She’s not a YouTuber she’s an actual respected artist with a 23 year career. This is ridiculous. 

This is true 

[DonMegaX]

1 hour ago, GODNA IS A QUEEN said:

Sis this has nothing to do with gender. A pop music legend and pop culture icon like Britney Spears stooping down to making an OnlyFans would only cheapen her brand and image, so yes it is beneath her. Doesn’t matter if it’s male or female. Timberlake. Beyonce. Eminem. Gaga, etc. Bonafide music icons shouldn’t have to stoop to that level, especially considering that OnlyFans is usually meant to give a platform for those who are either financially struggling or for TikTok/Twitter/social media stars who want to bring in extra income or gain more traction. Music icons are above that. I can’t believe some of you are this delusional.

 

27 minutes ago, KrisJ said:

Thank you! Imagine Beyoncè doing “only fans” - Britney is above, past and beyond stooping to Onlyfans trash. 

 

2 hours ago, Britneylandia said:

She’s not a por.nstar! I would totally hate that! 

 

1 hour ago, Phonography423 said:

She’s not a YouTuber she’s an actual respected artist with a 23 year career. This is ridiculous. 

Britney stans always seem to only know how to spew hate,

[handmedown]

1 hour ago, GirlOnTheMoon said:

I can't believe we are in 2022 and people are still judging the way women desire to express themselves or saying that a way of expression is "beneath" them. It might be beneath YOUR perception of her, but certainly not beneath her. There's nothing wrong with it and nothing she could do on there that would "lower" her legacy or her as a person.

If you're over the age of 25 and still think this way, you really are delusional and have a lot of growing up still to do.  In the real world, grown adults still have standards thankfully.

"Can't make a wife out of a --" as the saying goes.

[handmedown]

1 hour ago, DonMegaX said:

"But her kids..." This woman has had grown men lusting after her since 1998; them boys are going to hear it whether she's clothed or not.

A yes, way to stick it to those pervy men.  Rather than try to hold society to any sort of standard, you're just gonna jump right in the gutter and roll around in the **** with them.  Modern day feminism everyone. 

[DignifiedLove]

17 minutes ago, DonMegaX said:

 

 

 

Britney stans always seem to only know how to spew hate,

I agree. Just look at the Katy Perry or Lady Gaga threads on here. Not a good look for them.

[rik]

She shouldn’t do this not because of modesty or anything, but because it would destroy the lives of other s** workers and adult entertainers who rely on the income from OF, and the control of their work that it provides. Britney if you’re reading this, do whatever you want but please don’t be a rich person taking from those who have less than you!! ✨ love your insta pics 

[IzABeesMama]

5 hours ago, Caleb Ellis said:

Is it low of her doing it for free on Instagram? 

Someone apparently enjoys the freebies. And who says she even needs to bare it all? She could cover bits and still make money… or even set up a patreon for her art, dance and music. 

[IzABeesMama]

24 minutes ago, Rik said:

She shouldn’t do this not because of modesty or anything, but because it would destroy the lives of other s** workers and adult entertainers who rely on the income from OF, and the control of their work that it provides. Britney if you’re reading this, do whatever you want but please don’t be a rich person taking from those who have less than you!! ✨ love your insta pics 

How so? People will pay who they want. Just because someone pays for Britney’s content doesn’t mean they won’t pay for someone else’s too.

[Cqleb]

1 hour ago, IzABeesMama said:

Someone apparently enjoys the freebies. And who says she even needs to bare it all? She could cover bits and still make money… or even set up a patreon for her art, dance and music. 

Lol no I was just curious and yes I agree with the patreon 

[Freakshow__]

6 hours ago, Kletus said:

I’d be here for it her onlyfans era!!! 

YAS OF era 

[mean little lips]

She is expressing becsuse she feels like it and she wants to rebel against being controlled, it's not about money for her. 

[blissfuloutsider]

I mean I would def pay $200-$300 for the s** tape wit her and Sam.. 

 

Listen depending on how much the scum bags stole from her, NOTHING IS OFF THE TABLE when it comes to having to make back the coins she got robbed of I mean damn  I'll support if she decided to do it.. 

[IzABeesMama]

32 minutes ago, Caleb Ellis said:

Lol no I was just curious and yes I agree with the patreon 

Oh I didn’t mean you… I meant the person who you replied to who said they would be done with her if she joined OF

[FemmeFataleBrit]

11 hours ago, Caleb Ellis said:

Is it low of her doing it for free on Instagram? 

There’s a difference though. 
If I sleep with a 100 men, I’m a sl** whatever. If I charge a 100 men to sleep with them, that makes it far worse in the eyes of society.

[IStandByWhatISaid]

lmao she's not a prostitute

[1inamillion]

Whoever things that she would do OF is just broke af. She's posting n,u,d,e,s  on insta just to express herself because it is a form of art, not to make a living out of it. She's been s,e,xualised enough in her life.

[Stefani]

She ain't desperate, sweetie. This is Britney Spears we're talking about, not Austin Mahone.

[DonMegaX]

14 hours ago, GODNA IS A QUEEN said:

I agree. Just look at the Katy Perry or Lady Gaga threads on here. Not a good look for them.

Oh, that's right. You and that group of clucking hens are just hypocrites and that's fine and well. Because your fandom is contingent on her remaining on this pedestal you've built for her.

 

13 hours ago, Rik said:

She shouldn’t do this not because of modesty or anything, but because it would destroy the lives of other s** workers and adult entertainers who rely on the income from OF, and the control of their work that it provides.

This is basically where I've stood on it. It would be a 100 times worse than Bella Thorne. Because, as I stated already, Onlyfans does not require you to be unclothed. It's an option, yes, but not a requirement. But the general public being generally stupid, would feel a type of way if she used it as a way to interact with her die hard fans who want to be able to chat with her and see what she's up to instead of disrobing. Because, as many of you in here keep doing, the general public says Onlyfans because they think it "sounds" more tasteful than saying ****hub.

[rik]

6 hours ago, Stefani said:

She ain't desperate, sweetie. This is Britney Spears we're talking about, not Austin Mahone.

Who the hell is that