Stannedforever Posted November 3, 2018 Author Share Posted November 3, 2018 Added sometimes and shamelessly bringing my post up Link to comment
Prince Ali Posted November 3, 2018 Share Posted November 3, 2018 Why her flop team didn't released it for 20th anniversary? My gawd, they can only do the basics, mediocre, tragic things Link to comment
Stannedforever Posted November 3, 2018 Author Share Posted November 3, 2018 Just now, Chris87 said: Why her flop team didn't released it for 20th anniversary? My gawd, they can only do the basics, mediocre, tragic things They really should dig up the masters and remaster her BOMT-era videos. Link to comment
Super Mods Puppy Posted November 3, 2018 Super Mods Share Posted November 3, 2018 21 hours ago, Stannedforever said: Well, the original video is about 30fps (frames per second). That's because it's standard in film industry and gives movies/tv shows and music videos that "cinematic feel". I doubled the frames with little bit magic So it's now 60fps giving it more fluid feeling. But this isn't real 60fps because the added frames are kind of motion blur between the real frames so it looks kinda weird but it's still so much fun to watch It looks more real because our brain is capable to register a way lot more frames per second than 30 and the more frames per second you see the more information your brain gets. 30 frames per second is choppy in my opinion but 60fps is often kinda soap opera-ish (because most soap operas are 60fps). No, the standard is 24 frames. It’s what gives it the cinematic look. All movies are filmed in 24 and some tv shows. 30 frames is what most tv and videos are filmed in and what gives it that sharp feel soap opera feel. Nothing is filmed in 60 frames, that’s way too much information that’s not needed and will rarely be used. I mean her fantasy commercial was shot on film and I got to see the raw footage when I went to the post production lab that worked on it. ( technically it’s not her, it was her stand in so I guess it’s nothing to brag about ) I went to school for film and work with these frame rates regularly. I shot a video in 60 for a client and they were put off by it so that’s why 30 is the norm. Although now with high def being norm it might change but so far I only see it mostly in action films . Link to comment
iceprincess Posted November 3, 2018 Share Posted November 3, 2018 Sounds awesome my dude! Stuff in 60 fps looks so weird, but fascinating to me cause it looks so smooth and lifelike Link to comment
floopy22 Posted November 4, 2018 Share Posted November 4, 2018 On 11/2/2018 at 7:46 PM, If U Seek Me said: Agreed. It's like people upscaling videos from 480p to 1080p and then saying they are HD videos. There's no point!* *Unless your TV is so bad at upscaling that it is better to feed it a 1080p source. I agree! But to be fair some upscaling filters do a decent job, but It's dishonest to call it 1080p HD. High sample rate/24-bit audio is another pet peeve of mine. It's completely useless since CD quality (16-bit, 44.1 kHz) was designed specifically to exceed the limits of human hearing. Link to comment
floopy22 Posted November 4, 2018 Share Posted November 4, 2018 6 hours ago, nels64 said: This makes no sense. You would just be adding extra frames of the same thing between those 24 frames since most if not all of these were filmed on film. Converting to 60fps doesn’t do anything. Yup! The interpolation filters that are used try to change the frames in between to make it seem like motion in the video is in 60 fps. To me it looks mediocre at best, and annoying to look at. Link to comment
Delicious Pork Chops Posted November 4, 2018 Share Posted November 4, 2018 On 11/2/2018 at 2:46 PM, If U Seek Me said: Agreed. It's like people upscaling videos from 480p to 1080p and then saying they are HD videos. There's no point!* *Unless your TV is so bad at upscaling that it is better to feed it a 1080p source. I've seen some nice upscales of Brinny videos, not those crappy ones where they rexport to a 1080 Link to comment
Stannedforever Posted November 4, 2018 Author Share Posted November 4, 2018 20 hours ago, nels64 said: This makes no sense. You would just be adding extra frames of the same thing between those 24 frames since most if not all of these were filmed on film. Converting to 60fps doesn’t do anything. The added frames are computer generated based the next and previous frames. It takes frame 1 and 2 and makes frame 3 between them by "blending" those two frames together. Sometimes it's great but sometimes it can cause weird things on screen. This is example of "bad frame". This frame is generated between scene change so it blended Britney's face with another scene, looking like early 2000s wallpaper Link to comment
RammyCortes Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 THANK YOU FOR THESE Link to comment
Britney x Irene Posted November 11, 2018 Share Posted November 11, 2018 wow! thank you!!! I am fascinated by this!!! Edit: now I think she's even more beautiful in "real" life motion :X it is surreal!!! Link to comment
RammyCortes Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 Are you still making these? Link to comment
samwoods321 Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 Thank you. Its awesome, can't wait to see the anniversary video sometime now Link to comment
Stannedforever Posted January 11, 2019 Author Share Posted January 11, 2019 17 hours ago, RammyCortes said: Are you still making these? My desktop cpu died, I'm saving for more powerful now and when I get it I'll continue (soon) Link to comment
Stannedforever Posted January 11, 2019 Author Share Posted January 11, 2019 I added ...OOPS Not the best quality but I hope I can fix those videos when I get my new rig Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.