Britney Spears: Setting the Record Straight, Not Dating Amidst False Rumors of a Hidden Criminal Past Discovery

[BadBunny]

17 minutes ago, Baronesse said:

His main account is @ThatsHowIRoll 

Oh look. Another barbaric conclusion, and not from DiamondCircus this time.  Do you guys not get tired making stuff up?

[BadBunny]

2 minutes ago, whenthedogscaneout said:

Lol seriously! People believe tmz and daily mail when it’s convenient. This lack of critical thinking would have made sense in 1998 when Britney fans were 5-11 years old. But in 2023… 

It’s funny bc you can tell the difference between which set of fans are stuck in the past and who are actually with the current times.

Edited September 14, 2023 by BadBunny

[whenthedogscaneout]

1 minute ago, EduardoFoster said:

If you say so Cade. Thing is… when someone tells Britney she cannot do smth, you know what she does next?

The damage control does more harm than good.

Literally pointing out the number of times she did hook up with this convicted criminal… does make it sound like the source might be an alleged ***ual predator like Cade. 

[BadBunny]

20 minutes ago, DiamondCircus said:

Oh yeah, it's such a barbaric conclusion to say an intervention and the c ship wasn't justified.

Literally what are you saying? 😭

[Daniela.tomasseli]

Let's applaud Britney for making the right call .

She was probably lurking our posts here yesterday. Love you Queen.

[whenthedogscaneout]

1 minute ago, BadBunny said:

It’s funny bc you can tell the difference between which set of fans are stuck in the past and who are actually with the current times.

Yep, these are the same people that would be the first to discredit negative Daily Mail reports. Now they’re the first ones to say “I told you so” when suddenly they report the “good” news that Britney only hooked up with the convicted, allegedly m3th dealing criminal twice. 

Sure, when her own children are quoted on a negative article it’s “Daily Flop” lies, yet THIS is solid proof all is well.  Sheep.

[BadBunny]

Just now, whenthedogscaneout said:

Yep, these are the same people that would be the first to discredit negative Daily Mail reports. Now they’re the first ones to say “I told you so” when suddenly they report the “good” news that Britney only hooked up with the convicted, allegedly m3th dealing criminal twice. 

Sure, when her own children are quoted on a negative article it’s “Daily Flop” lies, yet THIS is solid proof all is well.  Sheep.

And those who think logically or apply critical thinking are shunned by those same exact groups of sheeple. Britney’s fanbase (not all but many) are full of progressive socialists who aren’t able to form an opinion on their own. Are we really surprised though? I’m just tired of the constant infantilizing tbh.  

[Lucky☆]

Britney stop dating trash …

Find a man with more money than you who really likes you or try to reconnect with David.

Edited September 14, 2023 by Lucky☆

[Baronesse]

5 minutes ago, BadBunny said:

And those who think logically or apply critical thinking are shunned by those same exact groups of sheeple. Britney’s fanbase (not all but many) are full of progressive socialists who aren’t able to form an opinion on their own. Are we really surprised though? I’m just tired of the constant infantilizing tbh.  

Why are you bringing politics into any of this? You keep trying to degrade your arguments into bullying the "person behind the screen" and it just falls flat...

[whenthedogscaneout]

8 minutes ago, BadBunny said:

And those who think logically or apply critical thinking are shunned by those same exact groups of sheeple. Britney’s fanbase (not all but many) are full of progressive socialists who aren’t able to form an opinion on their own. Are we really surprised though? I’m just tired of the constant infantilizing tbh.  

I think the vast majority can acknowledge and admit something’s off. There’s a loud minority that seems so scared to admit anything is less than 100% great, as if acknowledging a single negative fact about Britney will shake up their entire belief system or something. 

[Gutterguppy]

40 minutes ago, Baronesse said:

His main account is @ThatsHowIRoll 

I told y'all it was them...

[BadBunny]

Just now, Baronesse said:

Why are you bringing politics into any of this? You keep trying to degrade your arguments into bullying the "person behind the screen" and it just falls flat...

Who exactly am I bullying though? And I only say that bc people of your nature fail to look at both sides and instead draw barbaric conclusions. Prove me wrong but here you are again. Maybe stay out of my mentions and manjobi instead but here you are with an opinion of yours towards me that I never asked for. Go away now.

[BadBunny]

Just now, Gutterguppy2.0 said:

I told y'all it was them...

Ah yes you got me. 

What’s your source? The DailyFail?

[KrisJ]

Terrible attempt at damage control - and if we believe it, she hooked up with him twice? 
Britney…you don’t have to just pounce on any strange D, you have actual real/non-criminal options 

[BadBunny]

11 minutes ago, whenthedogscaneout said:

I think the vast majority can acknowledge and admit something’s off. There’s a loud minority that seems so scared to admit anything is less than 100% great, as if acknowledging a single negative fact about Britney will shake up their entire belief system or something. 

People are afraid to hear opposing opinions. They don’t want to hear other possible truths or a speculation that doesn’t fall in line with their beliefs. They want everything to fall parallel in line with their narrative. At times, it usually then resorts to personal attacks or drawing barbaric conclusions despite them preaching about equality, respect, etc. I think we’re coming to a place where opinions of all kinds are able to be more valued but we still have a ways to go. I hope that sort of made sense, lol.

Edited September 14, 2023 by BadBunny

[whenthedogscaneout]

1 hour ago, HairFlipQueen said:

If he picked her up from the airport without alerting her and AFTER she tried to distance herself from him, then that’s worrying. That’s almost stalker behaviour surely? She doesn’t need this kind of crap in her life and should take steps to keep him away. I find him to be a very dodgy character, based on his previous actions and demeanour in that interview.

Maybe the bigger question should be why he was even allowed near her in the first place. I don’t trust Cade one bit and if he is the source here then it’s highly inappropriate to give us the number of times Britney hooked up with this guy. That’s honestly weird.

It might make for some “yay our girl got that d twice!” jokes, but it’s just not something a professional manager should share. I wish Britney was surrounded by GOOD people, for most people FAMILY would be a safe choice, sadly for her that option is irrelevant.

Edited September 14, 2023 by whenthedogscaneout

[whenthedogscaneout]

7 minutes ago, KrisJ said:

Terrible attempt at damage control - and if we believe it, she hooked up with him twice? 
Britney…you don’t have to just pounce on any strange D, you have actual real/non-criminal options 

Even if she made the mistake of hooking up with him (which she most likely did, lbr) it’s super creepy of this alleged Team Britney source (Cade?) to share how many times they hooked up. Looks dirty and unnecessary. Confirming any fling is not a good idea when there are cheating allegations anyway. But hey, we already know what people are saying about Cade so I guess it shouldn’t come as a surprise.

Edited September 14, 2023 by whenthedogscaneout

[Baronesse]

11 minutes ago, BadBunny said:

Who exactly am I bullying though? And I only say that bc people of your nature fail to look at both sides and instead draw barbaric conclusions. Prove me wrong but here you are again. Maybe stay out of my mentions and manjobi instead but here you are with an opinion of yours towards me that I never asked for. Go away now.

I would just ignore you but you stay derailing threads because you seek out this weird infinite, wordy drama with people and it ruins the vibe of the site... You did the same thing under your original account and you're doing it again. You know you can't do this forever anyway, eventually mods and Jordan will step in so I'm just like why?

Edited September 14, 2023 by Baronesse

[sweetkiss]

my reaction to all these news 

 

but i dont judge her like so many of you lol... its easy to judge when we r not in her shoes. imagine being real  humble but your tax bracket doesnt match that. i applaude her for still being herself and not having fame and money change her. 

 

should she be careful like all women out there? yes, but fans act too entitled in giving unsolicited advice lol.

 

im sure all of us have something messy in our lives. 

 

let her live 

 

 

 

 

[GmailMyHeart]

52 minutes ago, blackingouthenegativity said:

None of our business !!! If we stopped prying into her life in the first place in the early 2000s, recording her every move, then it wouldn't have blown up to the way it was. 

2007 was not a good time, but it was made worse by the media circus following her around as she did innocuous errands like go to Starbucks or Walgreens or use a public restroom and then overanalyzed every little thing about those moments. Just give her some space and instead of constantly having manic meltdowns about her life, reward her with praise when you see her do well. 

If we continue to hold Britney to a high standard, all the hate just becomes toxic noise and it's no wonder she cuts people out and drowns them out. All people like you want to do is have her live her life in a way that either keeps her working 24/7 and having no personal life or becoming a depressed 1950s housewife. 

You know all that media attention is what made her so famous right? It’s a double edge sword.  You can’t just make it stop when they’re highlighting negative things but embraced it when it rose her to immense fame.