Britney Spears’ conservatorship case will be going to trial in front of a new judge, Ana Maria Luna.

[HIM]

47 minutes ago, BritSabel said:

Deep's lawyers were incredible in every way,  I would have loved for them to defend Britney because they did their job masterfully and didn't miss a single detail, always to the point. 

And our Rosengart ...   ZERO moves!!!

Rosengarret is probably in his office finding the same evidence again and again but doing nothing with it 

[Hamelia]

You don't expect Rosengart to tell you his strategy, seriously? 

Depp's lawyers did not divulge theirs before the trial either. 

[argentinian.in.telaviv]

20 hours ago, Jup1ter said:

This is all I needed to see today.

[GirlOnTheMoon]

9 hours ago, BritSabel said:

Deep's lawyers were incredible in every way,  I would have loved for them to defend Britney because they did their job masterfully and didn't miss a single detail, always to the point. 

And our Rosengart ...   ZERO moves!!!

If I remember correctly, they offered to lead her case but I think Rosengart said no? Or maybe it was Britney? I remember people here mocking them and saying Rosengart was  an unstoppable beast… Well look at how the tables turned. I’m not saying Rosengart is complicit by the way, just that his aggressiveness doesn’t go beyond paper and the media. He has done the bare minimum.

[Blackout Britney]

On 6/9/2023 at 5:55 PM, Jup1ter said:

Where was the warning points for blatant transphobia and bullying of this judge looks? @GlitterRain @Slayer   Funny how you all pick and choose.  Yet didn’t mind dishing out calling everyone a racist in the other thread…  @First Class Diamond  

Edited June 14, 2023 by Blackout Britney

[Blackout Britney]

This whole thread literally bullying a woman’s appearance saying she looks like a man (underlying transphobia) but when people compared a lawyers looks to someone else all hell broke loose? And racist cards thrown out… Disgusting and contradicting from the mods tbh.  

Edited June 14, 2023 by Blackout Britney

[joe sp]

Judge Moon better deliver! 

Lets investigate ha just in case 

[LickedABattery]

1 hour ago, Blackout Britney said:

This whole thread literally bullying a woman’s appearance saying she looks like a man (underlying transphobia) but when people compared a lawyers looks to someone else all hell broke loose? And racist cards thrown out… Disgusting and contradicting from the mods tbh.  

[Blackout Britney]

3 hours ago, LickedABattery said:

Again, you’d prob be one of the people crying about racism in the other thread 

[very_urban]

On 6/10/2023 at 12:41 PM, BritSabel said:

Deep's lawyers were incredible in every way,  I would have loved for them to defend Britney because they did their job masterfully and didn't miss a single detail, always to the point. 

And our Rosengart ...   ZERO moves!!!

Were they really? It was mostly just aggressive PR campaign that made them look better while they were defending that scum.

[Slayer]

6 hours ago, Blackout Britney said:

Where was the warning points for blatant transphobia and bullying of this judge looks? @GlitterRain @Slayer   Funny how you all pick and choose.  Yet didn’t mind dishing out calling everyone a racist in the other thread…  @First Class Diamond  

Wakey, wakey! I’m not on the team anymore. Hence why I haven’t gave WPs, try tagging the correct people. Also I’ve stood up against transphobia here in the past and gave WPs for it previously.

[Slave4Godney350]

On 6/9/2023 at 8:30 PM, Lola2790 said:

 

 REVIEWS FOR JUDGE LUNA:
 

If you are a woman with a custody issue and Judge Luna is assigned to you, you need “AFFIDAVIT OF PREJUDICE PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE TO JUDICIAL OFFICER” (Code Civ. Proc., §170.6), to get your case switched to another judge.  This judge will ignore impeachment evidence against men. The judge will accept hearsay and obvious perjury against a woman. If you are a woman with kids, 170.6 this judge before it is too late.

Comment #: CA31328
This judge should not be anywhere near a family court. Biased toward fathers. Ignores facts and evidence. Disregards the law.

Comment #: CA31269
Factual, negative comments on this judge have been ignored, while she has alsoignored the best interest of the child, while acting anti-mom , anti-women. She also ignores solid evidence, of DV, perpetrated against women and DV perpetrated against the protective mom.

Comment #: CA31172
Judge Luna rules in favor of dads and men; she is is an anti-mom, anti-female, judge. Ignores strong evidence of DV and this is not in the best interest of any child, or mom-female, victim. She is biased, uninformed, rude and does not belong in family court.

Comment #: CA31046
All the negative comments about this judge are true. Ignored well-evidenced DV with thorough testimony and witnesses. Also did something else completely out of line and against the best interest of the child(ren) to punish mother that I cannot speak about without it giving away who I am.
I will just say that it wasn’t anything related to allegations of abuse or alienation, or anything else common that you would guess that pro-dad/ anti-mom judges would even use to justify an order.

Comment #: CA30662
This judge is motivated by power and politics. She should be nowhere near a courtroom, when they re-open. If you are connected, you will have no problem.

 

Oh no 

[Lola2790]

1 hour ago, Slave4Godney350 said:

Oh no 

She has a lot of eyes on her so let's  hope she doesn't side with the dad in the family again like all her other cases...