Britney Spears’ conservatorship case will be going to trial in front of a new judge, Ana Maria Luna.

[super.nova]

39 minutes ago, Rik vs Exhale said:

JUDGE LUNATIC 

THE NEW NAMES HAVE ALREADY BEGUN

at least it’s not another Sam, Jamie, Lynn, Lynne, etc

[Lola2790]

1 hour ago, Style. In Moscow said:

We went from Pennywise to Annabelle Maria Lunatic 😭😭

 

[PoisonParadise90]

Just gonna be the same ****, different judge 🥱 

[SJK]

1 hour ago, PlatinumB said:

Some people on twitter are saying she's worse than Judge Penny... This is going to go on and on and on...  Justice for Britney seems so far and feels impossible at this point. 

Well let’s not feed into “some” people from twitter. We don’t know anything so let’s just wait and see. 

[pancake]

she looks like lou taylor in a way and gives off those vibes

but lets wait and see

[ZoneGirl]

Maybe keep the racist any misogynistic comments to yourself this time, B Army, huh? We all love our girl but some of y’all remind me why I don’t really deal with the fanbase. 

[Lola2790]

14 minutes ago, SJK said:

Well let’s not feed into “some” people from twitter. We don’t know anything so let’s just wait and see. 

 

4 minutes ago, ZoneGirl said:

Maybe keep the racist any misogynistic comments to yourself this time, B Army, huh? We all love our girl but some of y’all remind me why I don’t really deal with the fanbase. 

 REVIEWS FOR JUDGE LUNA:
 

If you are a woman with a custody issue and Judge Luna is assigned to you, you need “AFFIDAVIT OF PREJUDICE PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE TO JUDICIAL OFFICER” (Code Civ. Proc., §170.6), to get your case switched to another judge.  This judge will ignore impeachment evidence against men. The judge will accept hearsay and obvious perjury against a woman. If you are a woman with kids, 170.6 this judge before it is too late.

Comment #: CA31328
This judge should not be anywhere near a family court. Biased toward fathers. Ignores facts and evidence. Disregards the law.

Comment #: CA31269
Factual, negative comments on this judge have been ignored, while she has alsoignored the best interest of the child, while acting anti-mom , anti-women. She also ignores solid evidence, of DV, perpetrated against women and DV perpetrated against the protective mom.

Comment #: CA31172
Judge Luna rules in favor of dads and men; she is is an anti-mom, anti-female, judge. Ignores strong evidence of DV and this is not in the best interest of any child, or mom-female, victim. She is biased, uninformed, rude and does not belong in family court.

Comment #: CA31046
All the negative comments about this judge are true. Ignored well-evidenced DV with thorough testimony and witnesses. Also did something else completely out of line and against the best interest of the child(ren) to punish mother that I cannot speak about without it giving away who I am.
I will just say that it wasn’t anything related to allegations of abuse or alienation, or anything else common that you would guess that pro-dad/ anti-mom judges would even use to justify an order.

Comment #: CA30662
This judge is motivated by power and politics. She should be nowhere near a courtroom, when they re-open. If you are connected, you will have no problem.

 

[PlatinumB]

10 minutes ago, Lola2790 said:

 

 REVIEWS FOR JUDGE LUNA:
 

If you are a woman with a custody issue and Judge Luna is assigned to you, you need “AFFIDAVIT OF PREJUDICE PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE TO JUDICIAL OFFICER” (Code Civ. Proc., §170.6), to get your case switched to another judge.  This judge will ignore impeachment evidence against men. The judge will accept hearsay and obvious perjury against a woman. If you are a woman with kids, 170.6 this judge before it is too late.

Comment #: CA31328
This judge should not be anywhere near a family court. Biased toward fathers. Ignores facts and evidence. Disregards the law.

Comment #: CA31269
Factual, negative comments on this judge have been ignored, while she has alsoignored the best interest of the child, while acting anti-mom , anti-women. She also ignores solid evidence, of DV, perpetrated against women and DV perpetrated against the protective mom.

Comment #: CA31172
Judge Luna rules in favor of dads and men; she is is an anti-mom, anti-female, judge. Ignores strong evidence of DV and this is not in the best interest of any child, or mom-female, victim. She is biased, uninformed, rude and does not belong in family court.

Comment #: CA31046
All the negative comments about this judge are true. Ignored well-evidenced DV with thorough testimony and witnesses. Also did something else completely out of line and against the best interest of the child(ren) to punish mother that I cannot speak about without it giving away who I am.
I will just say that it wasn’t anything related to allegations of abuse or alienation, or anything else common that you would guess that pro-dad/ anti-mom judges would even use to justify an order.

Comment #: CA30662
This judge is motivated by power and politics. She should be nowhere near a courtroom, when they re-open. If you are connected, you will have no problem.

 

This is so disheartening.  Thanks lola for the link and info 

[FullyDattAndDatt3full]

IM CALLED SATAN 

[Style.]

1 hour ago, Rik vs Exhale said:

She’s not ready for October 20 what a crazy ***** omg 

I said Rule number one to be a WHATTTTTT Can’t wait kANAdian sis!

[Blackout Britney]

2 hours ago, Jup1ter said:

This is so rude. Grow up 

[BlinkVenom]

Girl, that Loucifer with a mask on 

[nwonder]

59 minutes ago, Lola2790 said:

 

 REVIEWS FOR JUDGE LUNA:
 

If you are a woman with a custody issue and Judge Luna is assigned to you, you need “AFFIDAVIT OF PREJUDICE PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE TO JUDICIAL OFFICER” (Code Civ. Proc., §170.6), to get your case switched to another judge.  This judge will ignore impeachment evidence against men. The judge will accept hearsay and obvious perjury against a woman. If you are a woman with kids, 170.6 this judge before it is too late.

Comment #: CA31328
This judge should not be anywhere near a family court. Biased toward fathers. Ignores facts and evidence. Disregards the law.

Comment #: CA31269
Factual, negative comments on this judge have been ignored, while she has alsoignored the best interest of the child, while acting anti-mom , anti-women. She also ignores solid evidence, of DV, perpetrated against women and DV perpetrated against the protective mom.

Comment #: CA31172
Judge Luna rules in favor of dads and men; she is is an anti-mom, anti-female, judge. Ignores strong evidence of DV and this is not in the best interest of any child, or mom-female, victim. She is biased, uninformed, rude and does not belong in family court.

Comment #: CA31046
All the negative comments about this judge are true. Ignored well-evidenced DV with thorough testimony and witnesses. Also did something else completely out of line and against the best interest of the child(ren) to punish mother that I cannot speak about without it giving away who I am.
I will just say that it wasn’t anything related to allegations of abuse or alienation, or anything else common that you would guess that pro-dad/ anti-mom judges would even use to justify an order.

Comment #: CA30662
This judge is motivated by power and politics. She should be nowhere near a courtroom, when they re-open. If you are connected, you will have no problem.

 

[doomphantom1]

How did these clowns end up getting degrees?  I've never seen so much BULL**** in my life.

[Emil87]

2 hours ago, Jup1ter said:

I thought she looked familiar. @Dynamic Lights, come get your mom.

[Emil87]

1 hour ago, Lola2790 said:

 

 REVIEWS FOR JUDGE LUNA:
 

If you are a woman with a custody issue and Judge Luna is assigned to you, you need “AFFIDAVIT OF PREJUDICE PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE TO JUDICIAL OFFICER” (Code Civ. Proc., §170.6), to get your case switched to another judge.  This judge will ignore impeachment evidence against men. The judge will accept hearsay and obvious perjury against a woman. If you are a woman with kids, 170.6 this judge before it is too late.

Comment #: CA31328
This judge should not be anywhere near a family court. Biased toward fathers. Ignores facts and evidence. Disregards the law.

Comment #: CA31269
Factual, negative comments on this judge have been ignored, while she has alsoignored the best interest of the child, while acting anti-mom , anti-women. She also ignores solid evidence, of DV, perpetrated against women and DV perpetrated against the protective mom.

Comment #: CA31172
Judge Luna rules in favor of dads and men; she is is an anti-mom, anti-female, judge. Ignores strong evidence of DV and this is not in the best interest of any child, or mom-female, victim. She is biased, uninformed, rude and does not belong in family court.

Comment #: CA31046
All the negative comments about this judge are true. Ignored well-evidenced DV with thorough testimony and witnesses. Also did something else completely out of line and against the best interest of the child(ren) to punish mother that I cannot speak about without it giving away who I am.
I will just say that it wasn’t anything related to allegations of abuse or alienation, or anything else common that you would guess that pro-dad/ anti-mom judges would even use to justify an order.

Comment #: CA30662
This judge is motivated by power and politics. She should be nowhere near a courtroom, when they re-open. If you are connected, you will have no problem.

 

[Emil87]

1 hour ago, ZoneGirl said:

Maybe keep the racist any misogynistic comments to yourself this time, B Army, huh? We all love our girl but some of y’all remind me why I don’t really deal with the fanbase. 

Racist and misogynistic comments, where? 
Read Judge Lunas reviews, if anyone is misogynistic it’s her. 

[gar]

2 hours ago, Dama Etro said:

Why does she look like the AI version of a blonde Loucifer? 

Took the word right out of my mouth.

[Style.]

15 minutes ago, Emil87 said:

I thought she looked familiar. @Dynamic Lights, come get your mom.

[SonOfSun]

Are all the judges in California corrupt ?
 I mean it’s like there’s this whole evidence about the abuse that the Team Con did and somehow they always get away with thanks to corrupted judges, lawyers, doctors and media. 
She deserves JUSTICE !!! 

At least and at last her truth will be out there with the book, but I totally understand that she’s disgusted by the whole system and just wants to live her life without working ever again.