Jump to content

Mathew Rosengart requests earlier August hearing date - or at the very least suspension of Jamie until next court hearing in September


Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, Catalin said:

 

Holding him accountable isn't a bad thing, especially given the fact that Britney had been defenceless in court against her abusers from the very beginning.

 

You again :makeup_kylie_jenner_makeup_brush_lol_laugh_haha_hehe_lmao:

Holding Matthew accountable for what? :mcwave_mariah_Carey_kiss_bye_goodbye_wave:

Link to comment

It took Rosengart for Jodi and Britney's medical team to suddenly come out,  agree and say Jamie is harmful to her. God bless this man because god knows nothing would have ever happened if it wasn't for someone like him joining the fight. This is what a "plan" in action looks like. in quotations because the ones who know, know.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
7 hours ago, Catalin said:

Holding him accountable isn't a bad thing, especially given the fact that Britney had been defenceless in court against her abusers from the very beginning.

Ingham is with Britney since the beginning, from 2008 to July 2021. Project Rose has been with Britney for a month and there is huge improvements on her case. 
 

What need to be held accountable is Penny’s decision. If Brenda Petty is still keeping Jamie after the hearing, we will riot. :letitburn_elmo_fire_flames_burn:

Link to comment
23 minutes ago, RAITEI said:

What did he say about lou?

Further, and again by way of illustration only, although a full recitation of facts discovered thus
far (in just two-three weeks) is beyond the scope of this Application, whether out of misfeasance or
something far worse, Mr. Spears appears to have, at the least, grossly overpaid Ms. Spears’s former
2
Upon information and belief some of these services have included, or at least now include, leaking
misleading information to the press about Conservator of the Person Jodi Montgomery.

EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER TO ADVANCE SEPTEMBER 29 HEARING DATE ON
PETITION TO REMOVE JAMES P. SPEARS AS CONSERVATOR OF THE ESTATE
business manager Tri Star Sports & Entertainment (“Tri Star”), allowing it to extract exorbitant sums of
money from the Estate (without Ms. Spears’s actual consent).
For example, in December 2019, Mr. Spears inexplicably approved a payment to Tri Star in
excess of $300,000 above the approximate $200,000 that was supposedly payable to Tri Star at the time.
This $300,000 payment was not due to any extra duties or work performed by Tri-Star. To the contrary,
for whatever reason, Mr. Spears complied with Tri Star’s request for a $500,000 payment from the Estate
as a “floor.” More problematically, this payment was sought (and paid) despite Ms. Spears’s indefinite
early-2019 hiatus. That is, rather than negotiating a new, less lucrative agreement as a result of Ms.
Spears’s hiatus, or moving Ms. Spears’s business management elsewhere, Mr. Spears allowed Tri Star to
siphon more than twice Ms. Spears’s annual allowance out of her Estate, while Ms. Spears was on hiatus.
When cast even in the most benign light, this decision prioritized Tri Star’s interests (and those of its
principals) over Ms. Spears’s interests, in contravention of Mr. Spears’s fiduciary obligations and
responsibility as conservator to elevate Ms. Spears’s best interests over his own or those of others in his
circle. An investigation is warranted but can only commence fully once Mr. Spears is removed.
A conservatorship should be a last resort, designed to benefit the conservatee rather than a
mechanism designed to serve as a tool for the enrichment of third parties.3 Although a proper
conservatorship exists to protect a conservatee from undue influence, it is apparent that this
conservatorship has allowed would-be influencers to take control of the Estate and exploit Ms. Spears,
often for their own benefit. The suspension and ultimate removal of Mr. Spears will be the first step
towards rectifying that abuse.

3
Tri Star and its principal Lou Taylor have been accused by third parties of attempting to utilize
conservatorships to their business advantage. (See Ronan Farrow and Jia Tolentino, “Britney Spears’s
Conservatorship Nightmare, The New Yorker, Jul. 3, 2021, last accessed Aug. 1, 2021.
(https://www.newyorker.com/news/american-chronicles/britney-spears-conservatorship-nightmare)).
Although these allegations have been denied by Tri Star and further investigation is warranted before
conclusions are reached, the exploitation of Ms. Spears and the presumption that the Britney Spears
“brand” is what needs protection is more than troubling. It also flies in the face of the legislative and
judicial intent of the Probate Code: to serve the Conservatee’s best interests.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
9 minutes ago, neverover said:

Ingham is with Britney since the beginning, from 2008 to July 2021. Project Rose has been with Britney for a month and there is huge improvements on her case. 
 

What need to be held accountable is Penny’s decision. If Brenda Petty is still keeping Jamie after the hearing, we will riot. :letitburn_elmo_fire_flames_burn:

im down with riots right now!!

Link to comment
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

We noticed you're using an ad blocker  :ehum_britney_um_unsure_confused_what:

Thanks for visiting Exhale! Your support is greatly appreciated 💜  

Exhale survives through advertising revenue. Please, disable your ad block extension to help us and continue browsing Exhale. 🙏

I've disabled ad block