Would Glory have done better with different singles?

[iZacaree]

It wasn't the single choices, it was the promotion and the overall album roll-out. Make Me was a great first single. It was radio friendly, ****, fresh, and just a really great new sound for Britney. When the audio was first released, everyone really liked it, and it shot up the charts on iTunes. The problems came from the lack of good album/single promo, the tragic music video MESS, the delayed single release and BBMA confusion, and the fact that Britney promoted Vegas more than her album. Slumber Party was a great song too, but the damage was already done, and they waited too long to release it as a single.

[none]

in a way no because the promotion wasn't really there and they can't expect stuff to be hits anymore without effort

with that said, i would have handled the singles differently

1. Make Me (ft. Missy Elliot)
2. Do You Wanna Come Over
3. Love Me Down
4. Mood Ring

[Body ache]

Blame Iggy for taking Britney down with her.

[WhatEverYouWant]

The singles were perfect. It would have done better if the singles were handled better. 

[monkeystar88]

Make Me but perhaps with a more established feature or none. It needed the original video as well as a simultaneous release with the vma performance. Slumber Party was a bad choice especially with Tinashe. I think CLUMSY or Man on the MOON or Just Love Me something unexpected. Make Me was a hit guys #17 twice and #1 dance charts.

[Charming.max]

I think britney jean+pretty girls+make original video = destroyed glory sales. 

the only way britney can be saved in b10 is having her first single by max martin, she only needs that one #1 billboard hot 100 to be on top again and sell.