FINALLY ANSWERS: Brits team scrapped the video because..

[Bisasam]

LOL what ***** are team B on

[Marcanthony]

1 minute ago, Jackk said:

.. We knew they were stupid as soon as they released Britney Jean.

dead

[generation glory]

First video is artistic. It's abstract. Viewers draw their own conclusions. It's a conversation piece.

Second video is plain. It's ordinary. Predictable. 

 

 

[EarlyMorning]

I dont like new video. I am not gonna buy it i am not gonna stream it.. 

They are professionals they should talk about concept and reedit some parts if they wanted to. Not to shoot whole new cheap commercial video

I love so much that song but they just buried it...

[TheLightningThief]

Yeah right. Let's spend 2 million dollars on a pointless video with no storyline (even though we knew that before filming) and then scrap it and replace with another cheap video with a dumber storyline that doesn't match the song either. I'll stick with David's version of the story, thanks.

[Guest Nick Jonas]

And Toxic, Work ***** and Hold It Against Me videos make sense? 

[WootsWow]

What a joke. They're basically telling the media outlet their sides of stories via "close sources". Have some balls and post it officially. Even snake Tayhoe Swift have the guts to defend herself.

[It's Selena]

As if the official video made more sense 

[Borja]

LOOOOOOOL I can't seriously. I can't with Britney and her team ******* up everything they do.

Sometimes I wake up and I wish Britney was Beyonce's and gets surrounded by smart people. Oh god how much they all need to learn how to make someone big and successful.

[Aleina]

12 minutes ago, Britneyluver9965 said:

 Ask anyone who had the video before it all leaked. All will say "it's a good video, but kind of makes no sense."

Genuine question: I wonder if they could have at least used parts of the original video that were great e.g. her in glitter.

Or is that not possible due to copyright stuff?

If they didn't like some parts it doesn't mean they had to get rid of all of it.

[Aleina]

2 minutes ago, Aleina said:

 

I managed to Quote myself... how do you delete a post?

[Mani911]

JUST BECAUSE YOU CAN'T UNDERSTAND ART DOESN'T MEAN IT'S ******* POINTLESS, ******* *******, worst damage control ever. 

TELL THAT TO THE PICASSO

(AND SHOW ME THE POINT IN THE NEW ******* VIDEO BECAUSE THE ONLY ONE I SEE IS EOS COMMERCIAL)

[semaj]

2 minutes ago, Tom's Diner said:

As if the official video makes more sense 

 

[Prince Ali]

#marketingploy

original video is released tonight

[DARC1993]

Who gives a **** if it was "disjointed" lame *** excuse. 

She looked fierce as hell and I'm tired of the GP thinking Britney still looks like she did during her hard times.

[Buttercup]

As if all of her past mv had a coherent storyline lol

[OxygenBabe]

The reason why everyone is disappointed and angry is because even the reshot has no storyline!

They wanted a new video? Fine.

They had little time? Fine.

The point is they could have shot a better video with the same budget and time, a video that could actually fit the song.

Britney thought she was too ******? Well, it's not like she isn't showing her *** in the new one twerking left and right. Only problem is, without storyline it just looks embarrassing and sort of cringeworthy tbh. 

So don't tell me it's because Britney wants to change her image cause she ain't doing it like that (read some comments saying this) 

They should have done a romantic storyline or whatever. Might have been boring, but at least it would have a storyline that fits the song! 

She looks beautiful though 

[Aleina]

... so that's confirmation that the rumors about a mv no 2 are incorrect...

[AncientPheonix]

13 minutes ago, zone said:

So its official they are stupid 

Agreeee .. 10000000% stupid!!!

[IUSAtonight]

Tbh both videos seem kinda pointless and random. They probably should have talked about it befire coming up with either one of them