LAWYER READY TO SETTLE WITH JAMIE ... But There's A Big Problem

[Switchy]

BRITNEY SPEARS LAWYER READY TO SETTLE WITH JAMIE ... But There's A Big Problem

 

Britney Spears' lawyer has sent an email to the lawyer repping Jamie Spears, hurling numerous allegations against her dad -- opening the door for settlement negotiations -- but we're told Jamie's lawyer wasn't having it, saying he blew it by waiting way too long.

Two sources with direct knowledge tell TMZ ... Mathew Rosengart's email opened with an acknowledgment Jamie was in poor health and this might be an appropriate time to acknowledge his alleged misdeeds during the conservatorship and pay Britney an unspecified sum so the legal dispute could be put to bed.

One of his claims ... Jamie authorized the illegal surveillance of Britney ... specifically her phone. Here's the problem for Rosengart ... he never filed a lawsuit claiming illegal surveillance and the statute of limitations lapsed more than a year ago. Besides that, we're told Jamie's lawyer responded to Rosengart he was dead wrong about illegal surveillance.

Jamie has made a demand for Britney to pay certain attorneys fees he incurred connected with the conservatorship, but Rosengart says that's a no-go. We've learned Jamie's lawyer actually offered a year ago to withdraw that claim if Rosengart withdrew his claims against Jamie, but Rosengart said no. Now, a year later, Rosengart seems ready to talk settlement, but we're told it didn't go over well with Jamie's team because of all the threats and allegations.

Now the case is set for trial in May, and we're told there is explosive evidence that would not be favorable to Britney. Beyond that, some of the biggest claims Rosengart has made will never go to court because the statute of limitations has run, and the conservatorship judge approved some of the expenditures Rosengart is contesting.

Sounds like an uphill climb.

 

Whatever TMZ is saying is full of half truths.

[stronger1992]

WHY do we post TMZ content? WHY? We know they don’t give two effs about Britney. 

[Oliver_]

This is the best they can do after the book? 

[everybodygoesdown]

8 minutes ago, stronger1992 said:

WHY do we post TMZ content? WHY? We know they don’t give two effs about Britney. 

Because half of the world follows their reporting unfortunately it has a trickle down effect.

I hate reading what they post about her but at least if we read it here we don't give them any clicks.

[2K16NEY]

Explosive info???? that will again try to justify stripping someone of their rights 

[Grace Kelly]

What utter, ill-informed b*ll****.

Explosive evidence, what explosive evidence? What could that even possibly be? Britney did not have control over anything for the past 13 years! He was after all "Britney Spears". Regarding the statutute of limitations that is also nonsense. As the conservator he had a personal and fiduciary responsibility to her as the conservatee and if he is shown to have breached that he will be held responsible and the £45 million bond that is in place will have to pay out. That is why the conservatorship court made him take one out in the first place and the bond company will make Jamie Spears pay them back if it pays out to compenstate Britney. The statute of limitations for a potential lawsuit is irrelevant here, as we are talking about procedures under the conservatorship court to wrap up the conservatorship. 

 

Nothing more than team con bravado, who I have no doubt in my mind have been the ones desparate to settle. He is probably nervous about the trial and the potential consequences, although he is somewhat familiar with the bankruptcy processes which will inevitably come if it goes Britney's way.       

[Switchy]

5 minutes ago, Grace Kelly said:

What utter, ill-informed b*ll****.

Explosive evidence, what explosive evidence? What could that even possibly be? Britney did not have control over anything for the past 13 years! He was after all "Britney Spears". Regarding the statutute of limitations that is also nonsense. As the conservator he had a personal and fiduciary responsibility to her as the conservatee and if he is shown to have breached that he will be held responsible and the £45 million bond that is in place will have to pay out. That is why the conservatorship court made him take one out in the first place and the bond company will make Jamie Spears pay them back if it pays out to compenstate Britney. The statute of limitations for a potential lawsuit is irrelevant here, as we are talking about procedures under the conservatorship court to wrap up the conservatorship. 

 

Nothing more than team con bravado, who I have no doubt in my mind have been the ones desparate to settle. He is probably nervous about the trial and the potential consequences, although he is somewhat familiar with the bankruptcy processes which will inevitably come if it goes Britney's way.       

Exactly! When it comes to tmz and Britney, I believe the exact opposite of what they say. Jamie and co are scared. They can say whatever they want about Britney, but at the end of the day, they were the ones forcing her to work. So they were either forcing a mentally incapacitated person to work for other people's gain or they lied. Either way, it should be a lose lose situation. 

[Estrella]

lol what explosive information, if she was under his care? and everything was decided by her father ,even what she eats, they seem to me very desperate and of course TMZ would support these leeches.

[Dark Willow]

 Rose... Settle? 

[blackingouthenegativity]

"We're told there's explosive evidence that would not be favorable to Britney"

How many times have we heard this? Britney literally said in her testimony that this is what Team Con and her father threatened her if she didn't go to the mental health facility. If they had something, they would have released it by now through Jabba Lou's book, K-Flop's Daphne interviews, or through some other means. 

[Gutterguppy]

If by explosive evidence they mean releasing whatever medical history she has, then they are bottom of the barrel trash and deserve every bad thing that happens to them. Rosengart is trying to extend an olive branch and do Papa Spears a favor since he knows he probably doesn’t have long left, and this is how they want to act. I’m so disgusted. 

[ICouldntThinkOfOne]

The court will be dealing with Jamie's alleged misconduct. Ultimately, sharing anything to shame Britney, rather than proof Jamie was in someway justified and within him remit just kinda proves the point.

[Seanril]

I truly wish that he did not let the statue of limitations go by. They deserve to be punished for every single thing they did to her.

[MintChocoLatte]

This man is still out there threatening to destroy his own daughter in front of everyone. Father of the year.

[Catalin]

They will settle eventually. That's what Rosengart is here for. Damage control.

[J45x]

I wonder What explosive info could they have that they havent used in the past??? mmmmmmmm

Another scoop about how she is addicted to caffeine and her family is worried?

 

 

Britney has a big heart, because if I was her I could care less if Parnell  was on a deathbed. I will be like: Give me my money before your eternal station in HELL 

[Lola2790]

On 10/27/2023 at 7:44 AM, Switchy said:

BRITNEY SPEARS LAWYER READY TO SETTLE WITH JAMIE ... But There's A Big Problem

 

Britney Spears' lawyer has sent an email to the lawyer repping Jamie Spears, hurling numerous allegations against her dad -- opening the door for settlement negotiations -- but we're told Jamie's lawyer wasn't having it, saying he blew it by waiting way too long.

Two sources with direct knowledge tell TMZ ... Mathew Rosengart's email opened with an acknowledgment Jamie was in poor health and this might be an appropriate time to acknowledge his alleged misdeeds during the conservatorship and pay Britney an unspecified sum so the legal dispute could be put to bed.

One of his claims ... Jamie authorized the illegal surveillance of Britney ... specifically her phone. Here's the problem for Rosengart ... he never filed a lawsuit claiming illegal surveillance and the statute of limitations lapsed more than a year ago. Besides that, we're told Jamie's lawyer responded to Rosengart he was dead wrong about illegal surveillance.

Jamie has made a demand for Britney to pay certain attorneys fees he incurred connected with the conservatorship, but Rosengart says that's a no-go. We've learned Jamie's lawyer actually offered a year ago to withdraw that claim if Rosengart withdrew his claims against Jamie, but Rosengart said no. Now, a year later, Rosengart seems ready to talk settlement, but we're told it didn't go over well with Jamie's team because of all the threats and allegations.

Now the case is set for trial in May, and we're told there is explosive evidence that would not be favorable to Britney. Beyond that, some of the biggest claims Rosengart has made will never go to court because the statute of limitations has run, and the conservatorship judge approved some of the expenditures Rosengart is contesting.

Sounds like an uphill climb.

 

Whatever TMZ is saying is full of half truths.

Looks like Britney might have settled because of her father's health?

 

Edited April 27 by Lola2790

[Gutterguppy]

21 hours ago, Lola2790 said:

Looks like Britney might have settled because of her father's health?

 

See my comment here

 

Edited April 28 by Gutterguppy

[whenthedogscaneout]

On 10/27/2023 at 2:44 PM, Switchy said:

Here's the problem for Rosengart ... he never filed a lawsuit claiming illegal surveillance and the statute of limitations lapsed more than a year ago.

wtf?