Jump to content

Why Was Amy Winehouse Not Put in a Conservatorship Slavery But Britney Was?

Recommended Posts

So confused. Amy Winehouse was amazing and I love her. She was going through a lot of visible struggles and the media hated her too, but she was not placed in a conservatorship even though she was visibly destroying herself. Britney refused to leave the bathroom for custody once and has been enslaved for 13 years. WTF?? :slowdown_down_cardib_b_cardi_um_fast_confused_what_stare:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
  • Exhale+
1 minute ago, BreatheForBritney said:

because Amy didn't have a controlling greedy evil family leeching off of her.

Oh she definitely did. Her father was and is just as bad as Jamie. He would of put her in c-ship without hesitation if it existed here in the UK

Link to comment
5 minutes ago, JackSProductions said:

Because it’s the UK and not US. The UK doesn’t have conservatorships as there’s much better ways round things.

It may not be known as a conservatorship in the UK but there are similar arrangements to a conservatorship worldwide. Most countries will have legal arrangements to protect their most vulnerable citizens... the issue is when the system is abused. 

In Scotland a Guardianship is somewhat similar to a conservatorship, and in England and Wales I believe it is known as a Deputyship. 


  • Like 1
Link to comment
3 minutes ago, Britney-fan12332143 said:

i was put in a guardianship because of my mental health. the only thing is is that i got out of it. 

I'm from Scotland too hence why I know about Guardianship Orders. 

I hope you're doing well :sendinglove_kissing_heart_love_blowing:

  • Love 1
Link to comment
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Create New...

We noticed you're using an ad blocker  :ehum_britney_um_unsure_confused_what:

Thanks for visiting Exhale! Your support is greatly appreciated 💜  

Exhale survives through advertising revenue. Please, disable your ad block extension to help us and continue browsing Exhale. 🙏

I've disabled ad block