Jump to content

Haburo

Member
  • Posts

    1,938
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Haburo

  • Birthday June 21

Profile Information

  • Gender Identity
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

1,320 profile views

Haburo's Achievements

Enthusiast

Enthusiast (6/14)

  • Reacting Well
  • Very Popular Rare
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In

Recent Badges

1.4k

Reputation

  1. Congratulations on your freedom Britney #FreeBritney #FreedBritney
  2. If they could interview some actual mental health law/human rights attorneys to comment on the legality of the conservatorship, instead of probate/trust attorneys who are involved and whose legal expertise begins and ends at forwarding papers to an accountant, that would be nice.
  3. Just so people are aware, people usually liquidate assets before preparing to make a transfer of some kind. Liquidating assets means any $ you have that isn’t physically money in your bank account (like stocks&shares, real estate etc) get sold to turn it into money in your back account to make it easier to move around.
  4. Sorry just to piggyback off @feo’s point, I really think we need to make clear that a probate conservatorship for control over someone’s estate is absolutely not designed to be a mechanism to managing lots of money, it is designed to be a mechanism to protect the human rights of incapacitated adults. I know that you are in no way advocating for it as a simple solution to a financial problem, but we need to really make clear that conservatorships are a mental health/human rights law mechanism and not strictly speaking one for probate/trusts (because conservatorships are also designed to confer authority over the personal). I don’t think it should be considered an appropriate solution to wealth management, if the conservatee meets the very low threshold of having capacity enough to seek advice, even as a last resort. The main issue with her conservatorship is not that she doesn’t have control of her estate, it’s that she is deemed legally incapable of instructing Counsel. It’s a rights issue. I think this is being overlooked by the attorneys currently involved. Lisa MacCarley seems to get it.
  5. The Netflix one will be seen by a wider audience. I just hope it is as good for the #FreeBritney movement as the NYT’s Framing Britney Spears one. I hope they at least get Felicia as well, and ideally Lynne too. They need to interview more (human rights) attorneys.
  6. What is happening with a restraining order? It is so hard to follow this on Twitter. It's all moving so quickly and nobody seems to care. I don't get how this isn't bigger. Isn't Lynne somehow involved now? I'm confused.
×
×
  • Create New...

We noticed you're using an ad blocker  :ehum_britney_um_unsure_confused_what:

Thanks for visiting Exhale! Your support is greatly appreciated 💜  

Exhale survives through advertising revenue. Please, disable your ad block extension to help us and continue browsing Exhale. 🙏

I've disabled ad block