Britney to someone famous at her wedding: “You’re such a classy famous person you piece of ****… I finally said it!!!”

[i sometimes sing live]

6 minutes ago, monalisaney81 said:

That being said, we don’t know the full story as to why Britney’s behaving this way. A lot of y’all act like its totally left field bc Selena supported Britney in public, but we don’t really know WHY Britney is as offended as she is bc we don’t know what went down bts.

That's the problem, though - none of us know what ticked her off so much, so why is she doing this so publicly? It's pointless and stupid.

[Greg Sargent]

54 minutes ago, 3IsACharm33 said:

Exactly and Britney actually knows these people so why are all of you so upset, nicki goes on queen radio and drags everyone her fan’s support it but we can’t do the same, we can’t honor Britney’s cold hard honesty? Says a lot about this fan base, most of y’all are weak and would run from a fight

Most Britney fans are nice girls who drink Starbucks and suck a d every once in a while with their pinkies up. Pop fans in general arent big fans of fight it out culture.

[Spicechinodiva]

Her latest posts suggest she's clapping back at the comments by the haters, and she brought back the nude selfish again. 

 

 

If it's one thing haters hate, is being clapped back, cos that is hard to top but like put into the corner now it's a game of chess. 

 

She gave them check mate move

[Wendy Williams]

2 hours ago, GlitterRain said:

This can’t be true 

I think everything is possible.  The girls were young and definitely wanted to fry each other with jokes. 

[davidspears]

I sometimes look back on things i've said on facebook from years ago and cringe and hope she does the same some day.

[Kiss my]

3 hours ago, Jordan Miller said:

Rude. Britney writes "my own party..." I'm open to hearing what you think that means then if it's not her wedding party. 

Writing “wedding” in the title is pure speculation, and the mods should remove it

[lucho pedres]

its all about Selena? I don't like her either, for me she is an hipocryte. but who cares.

[One More Time]

9 minutes ago, Kiss my said:

Writing “wedding” in the title is pure speculation, and the mods should remove it

The mods were the ones that changed the thread title to what is now. It didn’t said the first half it said “New Insta” and the quote from her post. 
 

I will not change the thread title because it was a work from the website so I think I don’t want to go against that. 
 

[overprotected_leo]

As I said few weeks earlier, we all want it lowkey to be Selena 

[Kiss my]

2 minutes ago, One More Time said:

The mods were the ones that changed the thread title to what is now. It didn’t said the first half it said “New Insta” and the quote from her post. 
 

I will not change the thread title because it was a work from the website so I think I don’t want to go against that. 
 

This only proves my point that this website encourages clicks over factual reporting 

[MasterMindz]

6 minutes ago, One More Time said:

The mods were the ones that changed the thread title to what is now. It didn’t said the first half it said “New Insta” and the quote from her post. 
 

I will not change the thread title because it was a work from the website so I think I don’t want to go against that. 
 

 

2 minutes ago, Kiss my said:

This only proves my point that this website encourages clicks over factual reporting 

Yeah I noticed that some of my titles change for clicks! Espeiclaly on hot topics. 

[Jordan Miller]

3 hours ago, HairFlipQueen said:

In her previous, now deleted caption, she mentioned Selena and Paris performing a song at her wedding and that girls were “clapping back” at her. She now mentions someone clapping back at her for two minutes at her own party.

I feel like you’d have to try really hard not to see that this is about her wedding, most likely Selena, after putting together her posts the last few months.

Or maybe not, as I said I’m not claiming that is 100% the case as she just won’t come out and name names, but my gut feeling is that it’s this. 

Appreciate this insight and I agree.

[One More Time]

1 minute ago, Kiss my said:

This only proves my point that this website encourages clicks over factual reporting 

I know I have done some sensationalist thread before for attention but…

In this case assuming it was her wending is quite right…

she talked about it in her recent post with almost the same words and if you think what party Britney had with celebrities That was a Britney party? She said someone performed for her and then clapped at her and now she again said the same thing so I think it’s quite obvious 

[One More Time]

Just now, Jordan Miller said:

Appreciate this insight and I agree.

Mte 

[Jordan Miller]

1 minute ago, MasterMindz said:

 

Yeah I noticed that some of my titles change for clicks! Espeiclaly on hot topics. 

Oftentimes it's because I have to change the original title in order for Facebook to populate an image. I don't think this title is a stretch. She is more likely than not referencing her wedding. Britney intentionally leaves things ambiguous. It's one of my responsibilities to draw engagement into Exhale, but I don't do it at the expense of lying or embellishing. Rather, it's my goal to make the titles a little clearer for people just arriving to the community. However, everyone is free to perceive me and my intentions as they see fit. 

[Jordan Miller]

7 minutes ago, Kiss my said:

This only proves my point that this website encourages clicks over factual reporting 

The community is doing the reporting. This place is centered around a very emotionally charged person we have all grown to love, adore, and defend at all costs (which means I get caught in the crosshairs at times - something I don't love but accepted a long time ago). I never write a headline or story with the sole intention of clicks. Yes, I want engagement here - that is the point of any website - but I have integrity and don't re-arrange things in order to fit some narrative in order to trick people into clicking. When I re-named the headline, I did so based on Britney's caption. She is referencing her wedding and if anything... trying to re-arrange the timeline of events or mince her words muddies the sentiment and power of her original post. 

[MasterMindz]

2 minutes ago, Jordan Miller said:

Oftentimes it's because I have to change the original title in order for Facebook to populate an image. I don't think this title is a stretch. She is more likely than not referencing her wedding. Britney intentionally leaves things ambiguous. It's one of my responsibilities to draw engagement into Exhale, but I don't do it at the expense of lying or embellishing. Rather, it's my goal to make the titles a little clearer for people just arriving to the community. However, everyone is free to perceive me and my intentions as they see fit. 

I'm stating an observation, not a judgement. I personally do not mind the changes, especially those fun ones that can cause drama 

[Jordan Miller]

15 minutes ago, One More Time said:

The mods were the ones that changed the thread title to what is now. It didn’t said the first half it said “New Insta” and the quote from her post. 
 

I will not change the thread title because it was a work from the website so I think I don’t want to go against that. 
 

Thank you. 

And I included a feature in all topics that shows what actions moderators took (including when a headline is changed) so there is total transparency. 

[Jordan Miller]

28 minutes ago, Kiss my said:

Writing “wedding” in the title is pure speculation, and the mods should remove it

It's speculation purely because Britney designed it to be that way. 

[MortalMarshmallow]

2 hours ago, BananaBoy98 said:

But her music is making people deaf 

I love Good For You, Hands To Myself, Come And Get It, Fetish, etc.

Wolves is overrated .