James Spears seeks to depose Britney Spears, She should be compelled to sit for a deposition just as all parties are required to do.

[blackingouthenegativity]

11 hours ago, Kletus said:

FIND HIS HORCRUXES 

NOW!!! 

The first Horcrux is a 12-pack of Bud Light stashed behind the Kentwood VFW

[cathaea]

I hate Lisa Maccarley's meddling in this case, but this is where she's making a good legal argument in her most recent filing. Jamie's legal justification here is solid and there's a good chance Penney allows Brit to be depo-ed, but he's essentially relying on Sam Ingham's ineptitude to shield him from accusations of harm and fraud. I am not exactly sure why Rosengart isn't going after Ingham. It's possible Brit was threatened and abused to the excuse that there's no paper trail showing she was directing Sam to do certain things on her behalf (e.g. you can't see your kids if you don't comply, so don't fight this -- so she never did), which means that there's nothing really to nail Sam with. He SHOULD HAVE fought back against a lot of the stuff Jamie did that was apparently court sanctioned (early legal documents from 2009/2010 corroborate that she was surveilled and he was allowed to do it). It really seems like the institutionalization in 2019 was when she really starting directing council and Sam had no choice but to comply with her wishes due to legal requirements -- previously it just kind of relied on him to see wrong-doing and do something about it even if he wasn't asked. So Lisa's point is good that Sam has to be taken to task on this is probably right on. At the end of the day, Jamie and the whole crew of frauds and abusers but Sam is the one who allowed them to get away with it by not advocating for her best interest.

[davelivesfree]

Can his colon ROT already? Thanks 

[Catalin]

Who are those "parties"? The only one forced to sit for a deposition so far is Jamie Spears, and even that after lots of money and time wasted. This is just another one of their gaslighting tactics.

[Kletus]

Britney was “compelled” to sit for thousands of hours of unwanted therapy sessions, thousands of hours of AA meetings even though she doesn’t drink, and four months of forced medicated prison time. She’s sat enough!!! 

[Kletus]

8 hours ago, cathaea said:

I hate Lisa Maccarley's meddling in this case, but this is where she's making a good legal argument in her most recent filing. Jamie's legal justification here is solid and there's a good chance Penney allows Brit to be depo-ed, but he's essentially relying on Sam Ingham's ineptitude to shield him from accusations of harm and fraud. I am not exactly sure why Rosengart isn't going after Ingham. It's possible Brit was threatened and abused to the excuse that there's no paper trail showing she was directing Sam to do certain things on her behalf (e.g. you can't see your kids if you don't comply, so don't fight this -- so she never did), which means that there's nothing really to nail Sam with. He SHOULD HAVE fought back against a lot of the stuff Jamie did that was apparently court sanctioned (early legal documents from 2009/2010 corroborate that she was surveilled and he was allowed to do it). It really seems like the institutionalization in 2019 was when she really starting directing council and Sam had no choice but to comply with her wishes due to legal requirements -- previously it just kind of relied on him to see wrong-doing and do something about it even if he wasn't asked. So Lisa's point is good that Sam has to be taken to task on this is probably right on. At the end of the day, Jamie and the whole crew of frauds and abusers but Sam is the one who allowed them to get away with it by not advocating for her best interest.

I think Sam Ingham should definitely be taken to task but it might be more challenging as he was court-appointed and sadly, judges and the court are humans and don’t want themselves to look bad 

[GirlOnTheMoon]

23 hours ago, Ghoulia said:

This is like, theater of the absurd or something. 

"Britney did not have to object to Jamie’s outstanding, routine conservatorship administration petitions. See Cal. Prob. Code § 2622 (providing a conservatee may file written objections)."

"Good cause is not required to obtain a deposition... There is no obligation for Jamie to identify topics for a deposition."

"Britney expressly approved each business opportunity in writing." 

"Britney’s testimony is necessary to illustrate the central role Britney played in choosing the care she received."

 

THE MEGA EFFING AUDACITY OF THIS DYING DECREPIT OLD MAN.

[Headed Peckerhead]

 

[Ghoulia]

9 hours ago, cathaea said:

I hate Lisa Maccarley's meddling in this case, but this is where she's making a good legal argument in her most recent filing. Jamie's legal justification here is solid and there's a good chance Penney allows Brit to be depo-ed, but he's essentially relying on Sam Ingham's ineptitude to shield him from accusations of harm and fraud. I am not exactly sure why Rosengart isn't going after Ingham. It's possible Brit was threatened and abused to the excuse that there's no paper trail showing she was directing Sam to do certain things on her behalf (e.g. you can't see your kids if you don't comply, so don't fight this -- so she never did), which means that there's nothing really to nail Sam with. He SHOULD HAVE fought back against a lot of the stuff Jamie did that was apparently court sanctioned (early legal documents from 2009/2010 corroborate that she was surveilled and he was allowed to do it). It really seems like the institutionalization in 2019 was when she really starting directing council and Sam had no choice but to comply with her wishes due to legal requirements -- previously it just kind of relied on him to see wrong-doing and do something about it even if he wasn't asked. So Lisa's point is good that Sam has to be taken to task on this is probably right on. At the end of the day, Jamie and the whole crew of frauds and abusers but Sam is the one who allowed them to get away with it by not advocating for her best interest.

There are rumors of Sam Ingham getting immunity in exchange for something. Maybe that’s why the heat is off him now? 
 

 

[RebellionSparkles]

1 hour ago, Ghoulia said:

There are rumors of Sam Ingham getting immunity in exchange for something. Maybe that’s why the heat is off him now? 
 

 

It’s going to be harder to go after the lawyers and Goetz. 
the hillbillies have to be the first focus.

[ObsessedBritFan1]

It’s called playing dumb. That’s what dumb people do. Get it?

[Ghoulia]

49 minutes ago, RebellionSparkles said:

It’s going to be harder to go after the lawyers and Goetz. 
the hillbillies have to be the first focus.

Oh, absolutely. Wallet has had immunity since he left, I believe? Granted to him by Ingham 

[Ghoulia]

3 hours ago, GirlOnTheMoon said:

THE MEGA EFFING AUDACITY OF THIS DYING DECREPIT OLD MAN.

Right???? I just don’t understand how that can be a plausible defense! She was coerced into signing contracts under threat. And even if she didn’t sign something, they could just sign for her.

[allthat88]

So Jamie last year thought Britney was so unable to take care of herself that he didn’t want to conservatorship to end but now he thinks it’s completely fine to put her under due stress to clear his name!?

 

give me a break. Anyone can see through this. Hopefully the judge agrees!!!

[Onyx1Boss]

Sounds unlikely Penny should allow this  given all the abuse allegations.. and why anyway? He had all the control and records