[RUMOR] Netflix documentary will have "lawyersforbritney" and is *allegedly" pro-conservatorship

[Steel Magnolia]

3 hours ago, kleinbritney said:

Britney's father owns nothing. He is only responsible for the period that Britney is under guardianship. During this time he only managed Britney's life and finances. As soon as Britney is fully functional again, all ownership will be returned to Britney. Your father then has no decision-making authority. He signed all contracts on Britney's behalf. As he is Britney's legal representative. After that, his name will be replaced by Britney's name. And everything goes back to Britney. He will not hold a position directly related to the guardianship that he negotiated on Britney's behalf.

To Netflix; We will have to wait and see what position this documentation takes. But it had to be clear to everyone that the other side would also strike to justify their side of the version.

Is that your opinion as a lawyer?

How long have you been practicing law? 

[kleinbritney]

36 minutes ago, Steel Magnolia said:

Is that your opinion as a lawyer?

How long have you been practicing law? 

If you know better, it's your problem. But it's wrong. A guardian is obliged to hand over funds that he has received from the assets of the person under care during the exercise of the guardianship if he has not used them for the person under care as intended. The same applies to all contracts that he has signed on behalf of Britney as a guardian. At the end of the guardianship, Britney's father is required to submit a final report and accounts report to the Guardianship Court. Then he's out. That is exactly why he does not want to end the guardianship. He cannot just overwrite everything on himself and assume that everything belongs to him after the guardianship. Why do you think that. What article of the law are you referring to.

[Steel Magnolia]

2 hours ago, kleinbritney said:

If you know better, it's your problem. But it's wrong. A guardian is obliged to hand over funds that he has received from the assets of the person under care during the exercise of the guardianship if he has not used them for the person under care as intended. The same applies to all contracts that he has signed on behalf of Britney as a guardian. At the end of the guardianship, Britney's father is required to submit a final report and accounts report to the Guardianship Court. Then he's out. That is exactly why he does not want to end the guardianship. He cannot just overwrite everything on himself and assume that everything belongs to him after the guardianship. Why do you think that. What article of the law are you referring to.

You've already said it yourself.

But Jamie has done something completely different. Over the past 12 years he has created a number of  new corporations with himself as President and Andrew Wallet as Treasurer. Then he has run those corporations as if he owns them, without any fiduciary duty to Britney.

Example: 

Atara Tours, LLC was created as a means to deliver Britney onto the stage during her Vegas residencies. When Britney pulled out of the Domination residency, there was sure to be some financial fallout for breaking the contract with MGM. What was it? We don't know, but while Britney was still in the mental health facility in early 2019, Jamie went ahead and changed the name on Atara Tours — he removed his name, and replaced it with Britney's name as the President. He didn't do this with any of the other LLC's — only Atara Tours.

What financial ramifications will that have for Britney? Will Britney personally now owe MGM or the insurance company millions of dollars? Why should she lose millions, when it was Jamie's signature on the contract and his personal company, Atara Tours, was taking responsibility for delivering her onto the stage?

Do you see what I'm getting at?

This is far more complicated than it seems at first glance. It could be why Britney's net worth is so low, and where that "missing" $600-million may have gone. 

Jamie has not necessarily been running things on the "up and up." It's going to take a financial audit to figure it all out.

What if the financial audit turns up criminal activity? It's going to get messy, and drag on for years to come.

EDIT:

Atara Tours, LLC grew out of this arrangement, which was brokered prior to the FF tour:

https://www.tmz.com/2011/09/27/britney-spears-dad-jamie-spears-larry-rudolph-manager-conservator-tour-manager-seven-figure-deal-femme-fatale-tour/

Jamie personally pockets millions whenever Britney performs...So if he's going to take the risk on promising to deliver her onto the stage, why should he not take the risk if she fails to show up?