Delicious Pork Chops Posted November 4, 2017 Share Posted November 4, 2017 @Kiiddy @Dynasty @annonymous Link to comment
Shadow. Posted November 4, 2017 Share Posted November 4, 2017 britney @ age 35 tragic Link to comment
naturalplayboy Posted November 4, 2017 Share Posted November 4, 2017 how about janet @ 51? Link to comment
Delicious Pork Chops Posted November 4, 2017 Author Share Posted November 4, 2017 7 minutes ago, naturalplayboy said: how about janet @ 51? IK janet at 51. still ******* slaying ugh. If she just stands there...you can just sense her presence and the passion and fire emanating. Link to comment
Delicious Pork Chops Posted November 4, 2017 Author Share Posted November 4, 2017 One of my friends is gonna see Janet this month, and I told him just pretend it's Britney when watching. @naturalplayboy Link to comment
naturalplayboy Posted November 4, 2017 Share Posted November 4, 2017 Just now, Delicious Pork Chops said: One of my friends is gonna see Janet this month, and I told him just pretend it's Britney when watching. @naturalplayboy I'm still debating if i want to see Janet in concert. I have 2 weeks until her show here. But yes, you're right there's passion you can feel fire even if she's just standing there. and can we say that body is snatcheddddd. Link to comment
praisecheesus Posted November 4, 2017 Share Posted November 4, 2017 i saw janet in LA and let me tell you she was a miracle on that stage. she hit every beat, every move, sang her *** off and was so present and warm. if you get a chance, go see it. you won't be disappointed. it's what i hope for britney. Link to comment
TeenSuccubus Posted November 4, 2017 Share Posted November 4, 2017 Britney needs to step it up, her production value live is just not there. She COULD do better, but she just doesn't...idk wht it is. With the hair,makeup,set and outfits being a mess it really doesn't hid how basic the choreo is. Link to comment
Hope Posted November 4, 2017 Share Posted November 4, 2017 I just realized, Janet had lots of fun stuff done to her face at that age, that's the only similarity to Currentney. The "All for You" tour was pure slayage. When will POM. Link to comment
BoyToySoldier Posted November 4, 2017 Share Posted November 4, 2017 4 minutes ago, Hope said: I just realized, Janet had lots of fun stuff done to her face at that age, that's the only similarity to Currentney. Nope, she's always had that puffy face. Link to comment
ITZFFGL Posted November 4, 2017 Share Posted November 4, 2017 1 hour ago, naturalplayboy said: how about janet @ 51? When will Britney? Link to comment
Ryan Godspeed Posted November 4, 2017 Share Posted November 4, 2017 give brinny a Janet's concert ticket so that che can take some notes Link to comment
Godney'sSweetCheeks Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 I HAVE to see Janet if/when she comes to UK. I'm worried she won't tour in the future and this could be my last chance. In my eyes - she is the BEST PERFORMER in the world right now in terms of amazing discography, choreo and passion. Britney just doesn't compete these days Link to comment
Delicious Pork Chops Posted November 5, 2017 Author Share Posted November 5, 2017 2 hours ago, cheri said: u guys overrate janet so much sometimes she's a great performer no doubt but u act like she performs miracles. Janet at 35 is what britney coulda been at her current age. But instead we get a glorified high school drag talent show. Link to comment
zxcvb Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 2 hours ago, cheri said: u guys overrate janet so much sometimes she's a great performer no doubt but u act like she performs miracles. It's also ridiculous because no matter how great Janet was at that age, she never had two kids. A better contrast would be Janet today at 51 and Britney today.and near 36. However, what Janet Jackson did during her Rhythm Nation Tour with live vocals and precise, complicated choreography/dancing was far more impressive than any era of Madonna; and showed more talent than her too. Link to comment
Pinky98 Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 Some of you really need to grow up Link to comment
Guest Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 1 hour ago, zxcvb said: It's also ridiculous because no matter how great Janet was at that age, she never had two kids. A better contrast would be Janet today at 51 and Britney today.and near 36. However, what Janet Jackson did during her Rhythm Nation Tour with live vocals and precise, complicated choreography/dancing was far more impressive than any era of Madonna; and showed more talent than her too. What do kids have to do with performing skills? Link to comment
nonoiseplz Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 Just watched Janet and 35 and 51... I still prefer Britney's Work ***** choreography to those 'boom boom pat pat' moves those videos showed Janet doing. Link to comment
nonoiseplz Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 7 hours ago, Delicious Pork Chops said: @Kiiddy @Dynasty @annonymous Ya'll would rip Britney to shreds if she did those robotic hand and shoulder moves in rhythm nation. Britneys "Work *****" choreography is more demanding than these clips of Janet, but ya'll stay delusional. Link to comment
nonoiseplz Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 5 hours ago, ITZFFGL said: When will Britney? When will Britney gets Janets sassy attitude? Because those moves she's doing ain't ****. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.