"Where is Britney?" - New York Magazine Exposé Out Now

[Lola2790]

Full article is now online:

The Fans Who Won’t Leave Britney Alone

WWW.VULTURE.COM

---

After the pop star was released from her conservatorship, some of her fandom latched on to a new theory: What if she had never been freed at all?

 

[PlatinumB]

Oh, I will be reading 

Edited July 31, 2023 by PlatinumB

[GlitterRain]

[Daniela.tomasseli]

I will be reading. 

[super.nova]

should be interesting. this will get messy for sure.

[Lola2790]

 

[PlatinumB]

5 minutes ago, Lola2790 said:

 

Bish I love you!

 

[Gutterguppy]

Unbelievable…can’t believe this was written. All speculative nonsense to further fuel conspiracies. Great job NYM.

And like clockwork, this thread will have pages and pages of comments cause fans will eat this foolishness up, per usual. 

Edited July 31, 2023 by Zoey1.25

[that's hot y'all]

nonsense crap

its oficial: britney spears is the new michael jackson

iconic !

 

[Yanal]

Here we go.. again.

[Hamelia]

12 minutes ago, Zoey1.25 said:

Unbelievable…can’t believe this was written. All speculative nonsense to further fuel conspiracies. Great job NYM.

Awful article. The reasonable voices hidden within conspiracies. 

[Jordan Miller]

I said what I said

When I did my first interview in March, I was not under the impression that ~Free Britney 2.0~ was going to take center stage. That became apparent to me in my most-recent followup interview this month.

Some of the things I'm reading in this article are cringe and appalling. Some people can't see the forest from the trees (maybe we're all a little guilty of that in our own right), but dayum. Let Britney enjoy her newfound freedom. 

[Lola2790]

 

[PlatinumB]

That article is wild and all kinds of awful! They really chose to publish such trash? The whole thing is basically about c0cky lol 

[kevin.]

[Jordan Miller]

1 minute ago, PlatinumB said:

That article is wild and all kinds of awful! They really chose to publish such trash? The whole thing is basically about c0cky lol 

Yea, when they told me that last week I literally said that's a little disappointing. 

Same with the docs (knowing Britneys' stance on them), I kind of wonder why I participate, but at the same time if there aren't any figures in her corner offering a brighter, more grounded outlook, it would just be this one-sided junk drawer of conspiracy theories and baseless claims. Sigh 

[Gutterguppy]

2 minutes ago, PlatinumB said:

That article is wild and all kinds of awful! They really chose to publish such trash? The whole thing is basically about c0cky lol 

And these people have the nerve to call themselves journalists. Their sourcing is literally a bunch of deranged fans making stuff up, because THEY want to believe she is not free. It's sad and sickening. At the end of the day, all this does is a disservice to the subject matter they're talking about. 

[Hamelia]

Jordan, your part is good. It's also good that you agreed to the interview as a counterpart to the conspirators. The author is an incompetent journalist. 

[Politik]

Wow! This is so disrespectful. It doesn’t concern anyone where Britney is. What she does is up to HER. People are still trying to control her by telling her how she should act and be post-conservatorship. She already said she’s retiring and not working. They need to let it go. 

[Gutterguppy]

5 minutes ago, Hamelia said:

The author is an incompetent journalist. 

She's not a journalist, she's a clout chasing hack