Surprise! Nick Jonas and Priyanka Chopra welcome their first child via surrogate
-
Create a topic! -
-
New Activity
953By Flavor Of Love
Started80By Cqleb
Started30264031091337 -
-
-
Similar Content
-
-
Recently Browsing
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
New comments
-
Britney Spears’ conservatorship case will be going to trial in front of a new judge, Ana Maria Luna.REVIEWS FOR JUDGE LUNA: If you are a woman with a custody issue and Judge Luna is assigned to you, you need “AFFIDAVIT OF PREJUDICE PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE TO JUDICIAL OFFICER” (Code Civ. Proc., §170.6), to get your case switched to another judge. This judge will ignore impeachment evidence against men. The judge will accept hearsay and obvious perjury against a woman. If you are a woman with kids, 170.6 this judge before it is too late. Comment #: CA31328 This judge should not be anywhere near a family court. Biased toward fathers. Ignores facts and evidence. Disregards the law. Comment #: CA31269 Factual, negative comments on this judge have been ignored, while she has alsoignored the best interest of the child, while acting anti-mom , anti-women. She also ignores solid evidence, of DV, perpetrated against women and DV perpetrated against the protective mom. Comment #: CA31172 Judge Luna rules in favor of dads and men; she is is an anti-mom, anti-female, judge. Ignores strong evidence of DV and this is not in the best interest of any child, or mom-female, victim. She is biased, uninformed, rude and does not belong in family court. Comment #: CA31046 All the negative comments about this judge are true. Ignored well-evidenced DV with thorough testimony and witnesses. Also did something else completely out of line and against the best interest of the child(ren) to punish mother that I cannot speak about without it giving away who I am. I will just say that it wasn’t anything related to allegations of abuse or alienation, or anything else common that you would guess that pro-dad/ anti-mom judges would even use to justify an order. Comment #: CA30662 This judge is motivated by power and politics. She should be nowhere near a courtroom, when they re-open. If you are connected, you will have no problem. -
By Dynamic Lights · Posted
OMG Ban for what? For literally asking a question? -
-
-
By justhanging · Posted
While the 2010 accounting filing is public, there were major decisions about the 2010 accounting rules that Judge Reva Goetz made privately. Those rulings are not available to the public.
-
Recommended Posts
Leave a comment!
Not so fast! Did you know you can post now and register later? If you are already a member of Exhale, sign in here and start posting!
If you are not logged in, your post will need to be manually approved by an Exhale moderator before it's visible to everyone.