Jump to content

#FREEBRITNEY | Britney’s Gram Received Worrying Voicemail Regarding Britney


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, PokemonSpears said:

No, I mean, I agree. Or I would agree in other times.

But at this point, they really need to be exposed in all their contradictions in less than a month. Not because we care, but they're part of the reason why other media isn't buying these "conspiracy theories". TMZ reports whatever bs they want, and every other media outlet pick up on that. They need to be stopped. 

Someone should start a Twitter thread exposing TMZ 

 

Oh yeah

You're always accurate at your comments sis :yesplease: 

Link to comment
2 minutes ago, jokobitch said:

Have people by chance sent Brenda the details about the conservatorship we have? And all the businesses that have been opened up?

Girl its her job. She doesnt need us ( hopefully)

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, jokobitch said:

Have people by chance sent Brenda the details about the conservatorship we have? And all the businesses that have been opened up?

I keep saying someone can go to court today or tomorrow & could actually speak to her and let her know your concern it’s a public place you have the right! 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
1 hour ago, Luxuriou$ said:

ok you go lynn... but why now tho ? it's been more than a decade since conservatorship... lynn was living under a rock this entire time so she wasn't aware or what ? i need answers :badthoughts: 

Great question. We don't know about the details of Jamie and Lynne's relationship.

If you look at the timeline, Brtiney's been booked every year since the c-ship was put in place. I think the perfect time to fight it is now.

Although she wasn't that busy in 2010, it was too soon. Like I've written multiple times before, with corrupt judges like Aviva K. Bobb and Reva Goetz on Britney's case it would've been impossible to fight the conservatorship. Also, having a court-appointed attorney was never in Britney's favor.

"The role of a judge during a hearing depends on whether or not a jury is present. In most serious criminal cases, a jury is present and thus it is the trier of fact, meaning that the jury looks at the evidence presented to the court and determines what actually happened and whether or not the defendant is guilty. The judge is the trier of law, meaning he or she ensures that everything happening in the courtroom follows the rules set down by the law. If a jury is not present in a court case, the judge becomes both the trier of fact and the trier of law."

The only thing these judges cared about was money.  

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...