Kiey Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 and scale down the video budget for the next singles if they don't want to spend that much? their ******* "ok this single flopped aka era over immediately" mentality is sickening yet for some artists from their labels they can get 4-5 videos even though the singles flopped britney wanted Alien but nope didn't happen now same with Glory, but this time they have such flawless tons of songs with huge potential at their fingertips worst of all the head of RCA promised the fans 5 singles treatment Link to comment
Dollanganger Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 Because of money. Labels are in it to generate profit and if they feel something won't return their investment, they won't do it. After the MM fiasco, they probably weren't looking to spend the much seeing how they cheapened their budget for Britney later and it also ties to promotion, she won't promote or do anything outside of Vegas to the magnitude of MM's promo so in the long run, they'd probably just focus on other ventures of hers that still generate revenue. Link to comment
BOBIBCFBG Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 maybe they realize that she wont do anything to help the single herself and think that it's bullshit? Link to comment
Kiey Posted February 23, 2017 Author Share Posted February 23, 2017 4 minutes ago, Dollanganger said: Because of money. Labels are in it to generate profit and if they feel something won't return their investment, they won't do it. After the MM fiasco, they probably weren't looking to spend the much seeing how they cheapened their budget for Britney later and it also ties to promotion, she won't promote or do anything outside of Vegas to the magnitude of MM's promo so in the long run, they'd probably just focus on other ventures of hers that still generate revenue. yes, but MM is at 17 twice, Slumber Party flopped ok that must be a loss. but combined with her Vegas profits, they would easily gather enough for a third single. it honestly seems like everyone at RCA is so old and dumb and amateur they didn't even send SP to Rhythmic even though they added Tinashe? how messy is that Link to comment
none Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 9 minutes ago, Dollanganger said: Because of money. Labels are in it to generate profit and if they feel something won't return their investment, they won't do it. After the MM fiasco, they probably weren't looking to spend the much seeing how they cheapened their budget for Britney later and it also ties to promotion, she won't promote or do anything outside of Vegas to the magnitude of MM's promo so in the long run, they'd probably just focus on other ventures of hers that still generate revenue. get out of here with that elaborate and logical explanation! Link to comment
Gambler Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 May 3rd single release with Premiere performance at BBMA .... a fan can dream? Link to comment
none Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 2 minutes ago, Gambler said: May 3rd single release with Premiere performance at BBMA .... a fan can dream? it'll be televised from the desert Link to comment
Kiey Posted February 23, 2017 Author Share Posted February 23, 2017 the Britney era had flops after flops and she got like 6 videos out of it so why can't Glory? Link to comment
camerasareflashin' Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 I think everything from this era flopped tbh, we knew it even before it started. Link to comment
Draw The Blinds Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 12 minutes ago, Via Infinito said: the Britney era had flops after flops and she got like 6 videos out of it so why can't Glory? Cause her imagine/brand was still generating TONS of money in other ways, including the world tour. Right now POM is really what's pulling in money for Britney and her team, so they will probably continue to stick to that. Link to comment
BreatheMe Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 3 minutes ago, camerasareflashin' said: I think everything from this era flopped tbh, we knew it even before it started. Before the MM video? Why ?? Link to comment
troubleguy Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 rca flop..team b flop..brit flop...tired of this guys i guess we know the main reason Link to comment
ITZFFGL Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 Maybe it's Britney. I have a hard time believing labels don't support videos. Britney could make a video for 10k if she wanted and can make that back ten fold in VEVO ad revenue. Think a simple video like Ariana on the mattress for Let Me Love You w Lil Wayne, or any of Beyonce's self-titled videos from 2013. Drunk in Love was literally just a beach, XO was just her riding rollercoasters, one video she was just rolling around in a bed. Miley's Adore You. Big Sean just released a video of him walking around a street with cool color effects for Halfway Off The Balcony. Even What Now Rihanna was a bunch of glamour shots. All videos don't have to be elaborate. If Glory was truly Britney's "baby", it would have more visuals. Link to comment
ohoney Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 1 hour ago, Via Infinito said: yet for some artists from their labels they can get 4-5 videos even though the singles flopped They don't want to take risks, Britney is already an artist with 20-year old career, they know she will NOT sell like before so they won't even bother, it's obvious. Link to comment
Dirty Boy Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 I think it's up to Britney. I mean, if she REALLY wanted a third single we would get it. Who would say no to queen? Link to comment
The Dream Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 18 minutes ago, Dirty Boy said: I think it's up to Britney. I mean, if she REALLY wanted a third single we would get it. Who would say no to queen? Who knows? She really wanted Alien too... In I am Britney Jean she & Larry were sure that by the second leg it would be released. As for the 'Who would say no to queen?' they made it a pretty big deal not to create a performance of it for the first leg and Brit stepped behind and said ok... And later we got just a simple performance with a chair. Like they could light her for 3 minutes more in the premiere? Sometimes she really doesn't get simple stuff Link to comment
Dirty Boy Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 Just now, The Dream said: Who knows? She really wanted Alien too... In I am Britney Jean she & Larry were sure that by the second leg it would be released. As for the 'Who would say no to queen?' they made it a pretty big deal not to create a performance of it for the first leg and Brit stepped behind and said ok... And later we got just a simple performance with a chair. Like they could light her for 3 minutes more in the premiere? Sometimes she really don't get simple stuff Yeah, but I can't really imagine her being angry about it, she probably doesn't mind Link to comment
The Dream Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 1 minute ago, Dirty Boy said: Yeah, but I can't really imagine her being angry about it, she probably doesn't mind I can imagine her being angry but not expressing it in some circumstances... Link to comment
CJMCH Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 They can not fix the mess of the MM strategy (late promo, scrapped video) with anything, so they have moved to B10. It's over. Link to comment
Lucky's Bitch Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 I hope we get one era like the Britney era where there were so many flawless bops being released as singles with flawless videos. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.