Attorney General Edmund Brown refused to investigate Britney’s conservatorship in 2008

[pieceofphil]

3 hours ago, ICouldntThinkOfOne said:

While I am in no way claiming the court should not have intervened, I think we're all forgetting one major factor here....

Britney did not have a lawyer working in her best interest, and her best interest alone; She had a court appointed lawyer who benefitted from the Conservatorship being in place. Britney was deemed incapable of hiring her own council, even though she literally did it....twice, and anyone who had the capacity to help her hire her own council was removed from her life. 

I'm not saying the courts had no idea; we know that this document proves that she was fighting in 2008, we know that she considered to retirement of her career to get out of it in 2012. An investigator told the courts it should be ended and not used as a oppressive tool against her in 2016, and we have all seen how 2019 through to 2021 played out, but ultimately, there was no one truly fighting Britney's corner....

The courts can only go on what is presented to them, and what is the accompanying evidence/precedent. We literally saw how 2019 through to 2021 played out under Ingham, his arguments were weak and flawed, despite bodies of evidence that Jamie should have been suspended.
 

Yes to all of that, but the fact that she has been deemed incapable of hiring her own lawyer without any waterproof declaration of her condition up until some when later in the conservatorship done by doctors hired by team con... That's a major red flag. I mean when there's no medical proven condition that hinders her having her basic human rights, then what was the ground for establishing the con to begin with.