Jump to content

#FREEBRITNEY | Britney’s Gram Received Worrying Voicemail Regarding Britney

whoisit

By whoisit
in Britney Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 46.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Dream With In a dream

    1254

  • SamanthaJadeFanGroup

    1215

  • PokemonSpears

    1154

  • Meaner03

    1062

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Kuzco
Kuzco

I thought Britney's grandma had received a worrying voicemail 

Catalin
Catalin

Do you guys remember that blind item from August last year?  This permanent A list "singer" is rebelling in one of the only ways she can. She has been refusing to take her medication which has

land
land

Her case is a public case in California's public records. Ever since the beginning she has tried according to these official records to fight the conservatorship at least 7 times, but was denied by th

Posted Images

LostInAnImage Master

LostInAnImage

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, PokemonSpears said:

If anyone shows up that day, I hope they ask Jamie about his colon and if Britney is doing better now that he's recovered. 

:haha: Personally, I hope to never hear any details pertaining to Papa Spears’ colon. He’s already a walking, semi-talking sphincter in his usual form. 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Goneforever Mentor

Goneforever

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Catalin said:

Corrupt or not, it will probably be a huge mess. I mean, how could Britney posibly defend herself agains Team C-ship's army of lawyers when she doesn't even have the freedom of speech?

We are not lawyers nor are privy to any deep knowledge of the c-ship yet we smell the smoke from a mile away. She's a judge will decades of experience, a clean record, and will have direct knowledge of the situation. If we can tell something is amiss, don't you think she will be able to see that too? Why would she call for a status hearing out of the blue?  Maybe the verdict will not be what we want but I trust that she will do what she feels is right. Unlike Reva that was probably bribed or was on a big power trip.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
  • Popular Post
LostInAnImage Master

LostInAnImage

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
2 hours ago, really really cool guy said:

They're portraying Lynne as the bad parent now and not Jamie. That's Team B at it again :juggingu:

Both parents are objectively terrible. Lynne has sold her daughter out, time and time again, with onset at approximately birth.

However, Lynne’s depths of depravity arguably have always been best illustrated with her ridiculously self-absorbed “expose” on Britney, prompting her to go on a press tour airing all the Spears’ dirty laundry (while defending only herself) at the same time her daughter was the most hated woman in America, publicly falling apart and had purposely estranged herself from said criminal parents:

https://ew.com/article/2008/10/01/i-read-it-so-yo-2/

(Also, the fact that no one ever brings up Lynne’s total perfunctory “btw, I killed a kid!” admission in the book is flabbergasting; what the **** is wrong with her)?

And, in 2008, she was telling anyone who would listen that Jamie was an abusive alcoholic and had no relationship with Britney. Less than one year later, however, she was back on the payroll, (which she has always denied despite documents proving otherwise), and released several public statements wholeheartedly endorsing Jamie as the conservator. 

Both parents are opportunistic, pathological liars; the only difference is, Ms. Sunday School Teacher Lynne is very cognizant of keeping up appearances as a “good, southern Christian mom,” while Jamie obviously doesn’t even attempt such a facade.

Edit: And despite Jamie’s greed, laziness, and abusive behavior, I don’t believe for a second that he would’ve been pushing Britney into child beauty pageants if it wasn’t for Lynne. It was clearly her mother’s dream for Britney (and by extension, herself), and that’s painfully obvious. A THREE-YEAR-OLD CHILD doesn’t “know they are meant to be an entertainer,” or whatever BS they always stated. A three-year-old has no awareness of career pursuits in the slightest. They just respond, and continue to execute, behaviors which provide them with positive reinforcement by their primary caretakers. Their entire story has always been patently absurd to anyone who understands basic child development.

  • Like 14
Link to comment
Shadow2003 Master

Shadow2003

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, LostInAnImage said:

I understand your point-of-view; however, suffering from a mental illness and being both personally and financially exploited are not mutually exclusive truths. In fact, data indicates individuals suffering from a mental illness are far more likely to be exploited and/or abused than individuals with no history of psychopathology. 

Further, while there admittedly are definitely some completely delusional fans who believe Britney is completely mentally sound and the conservatorship was a conspiracy from the beginning, the majority of us are simply illustrating the extreme incongruity between that which Team B claims:

Britney simultaneously being too ill to have access to her own money, the internet, and attorney, yet somehow remaining well enough to still be marketed as “the indisputable princess of pop,” who has been working nonstop (4 albums, 3 tours, a residency) for the past decade, simply isn’t rooted in logic, despite the countless variables and complexities pertaining to the treatment of mental illness (which I’ll be the first to elucidate that many fans absolutely fail to appreciate this). 

Just from my own professional and personal perspective, I find the combination of Britney suffering from a mental illness (as millions of us do, with far higher prevalence amongst celebrities as compared to the general population), AND her exploitation as two mutually inclusive truths. I would have to see very compelling, independently corroborated sources of documentation to believe otherwise. 

UNBELIEVABLY well said, my friend.

I also do agree, a mentally ill person would be more likely to be a target for control than a healthy person. With Brit's case, they could manipulate her through something related to her anxiety or the custody over her kids.

The third paragraph just sums up something we should all be aware of and know of.

I'd also like to point out the rich vocabulary used. It's a very nice touch.

Overall, I feel like this deserves a:

Final rating: 10 / 10 :clap:

  • Like 8
Link to comment
  • Popular Post
justphil Mentor

justphil

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

The original MM video edit that leaked was not his edit. Someone on her team put those scenes together.

He’s sickened by her team and what he’s witnessed. I’m very curious as to what that is. Abuse? Most definitely.

It’s VERY telling when professionals refuse to work with an artist because of their team. Nothing to do with Brit herself, it’s all the disgusting people controlling, abusing, and subduing her against her will. 

  • Like 18
Link to comment
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Go To Topic Listing
×
×
  • Create New...