Jump to content

Does Britney own her music?


Just Because

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 26
  • Created
  • Last Reply
3 hours ago, DayvinDazone said:

Britney is a textbook definition of what you DON'T want as an artist. She has very little control atm.

If we are not getting the mistery book she promised us, I would love to buy that book. 

"What you don't want as an artist" by Britney Spears- only on Amazon and Target

Link to comment
5 minutes ago, MissSpearsSaysSo said:

This is so sad. I wonder what she envisioned her career turning out like? Maybe she would have become someone like Cheryl Crow. Free and loving it singing and stunning a guitar. I’d love to hear her really develop her voice. She has a beautiful voice. 

There is a chapter is season 1 from Blackmirror where a girl is going to a SINGING show but the judges labeled her as a pornstar, they drugged her and influenced the public to choose the pornstar star. I think that record labels do that at some level. 

Link to comment
13 minutes ago, Just Because said:

If this is truly the case.... Where was her father? Where was Larry?  Where were her lawyers? Britney worked her *** off for so many years ..... :( It’s no wonder why Britney gives us so little.  Her handlers  are making all the money. 

But this is the norm for most major label artists until they "boss up" so-to-speak... it is sort of like being on an Army contract when you have a record deal - you get a sign-on bonus and then you will gradually get your percentage from touring/merch/royalties annually.  Artists that are under a major label deal typically do not own their songs recorded under the label until/if they sell a certain number, which is usually INCREDIBLY high.  Britney made the most money from contracts with sponsors and her perfumes, as well as Vegas.  Her music itself probably made her under a million in royalties if you consider all of the writers, producers, and label that will get a percentage.  

Link to comment

I was wondering this the other day, and it kind of worries me. I feel like when she gets free, they will still own everything with her name attached and she won’t even legally be allowed to perform her hits. They will do whatever they can to ring her dry as a form of revenge for rebelling. 

Like I said Britney, just know your fans will never let you fall ♥️♥️♥️

Link to comment

Straight up Industry puppet, as long as she has a house, tacky clothes to model, and Starbucks,  Shes content, She’s in her own bubble, it’s a sad case. Plus she’s surrounded by evil, all the money goes to them. No artist integrity what so ever. Just because they “let” her pick and choose on occasion. She doesn’t write anymore, doesn’t craft, just does whatever they say. 

Link to comment

Mmmmm. I would say yes, but by degree of seperation. After prince's fiasco, that highlights how important it is for a artist to own thier music. I think her management, lawyers and handlers probably do own a % along with brit and her legal team and family.  Of course it all depends on what contracts there are, what was signed when. She may only own bits & pieces 

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

We noticed you're using an ad blocker  :ehum_britney_um_unsure_confused_what:

Thanks for visiting Exhale! Your support is greatly appreciated 💜  

Exhale survives through advertising revenue. Please, disable your ad block extension to help us and continue browsing Exhale. 🙏

I've disabled ad block