Britney Jean's original cover art was actually the deluxe cover

[Trace]

When the Britney Jean cover was first revealed, it was actually the deluxe cover. 

And then they changed it DRAMATICALLY

from this...

 

 

...

 

to this!

 

 

and what a change that was! 

So maybe it'll still be changed. I don't hate the new cover, it's just not her best.

[The_Original_Toy]

That was not a dramatic change 

[Asakura Hao]

I actually really really like the Britney Jean cover. It's one of the better ones for sure, especially the standard edition.

[Trace]

19 minutes ago, Asakura Hao said:

I actually really really like the Britney Jean cover. It's one of the better ones for sure, especially the standard edition.

I think it's a really pretty picture of her (especially in color), but I think the cover suffers in being too similar in composition to Femme Fatale. I think the "Glory" cover faces this problem too, though the lighting makes it a little different.

[Asakura Hao]

4 minutes ago, Trace said:

I think it's a really pretty picture of her (especially in color), but I think the cover suffers in being too similar in composition to Femme Fatale. I think the "Glory" cover faces this problem too, though the lighting makes it a little different.

Glory looks like someone took In the Zone, Femme Fatale and Britney Jean and then mashed them up into one. It's not bad or anything, but it's just kind of not as great as I hoped it would be. Not gonna have a meltdown over it but I was sort of hoping they'd take advantage of her banging body instead of another face close-up.

[GirlOnTheMoon]

I don't understand why people don't like the GLORY cover.

IMO is absolute perfection. Ethereal plus ****.

[Trace]

2 minutes ago, Asakura Hao said:

Glory looks like someone took In the Zone, Femme Fatale and Britney Jean and then mashed them up into one. It's not bad or anything, but it's just kind of not as great as I hoped it would be. Not gonna have a meltdown over it but I was sort of hoping they'd take advantage of her banging body instead of another face close-up.

I agree. It looks like a good instagram photo, especially with how the text looks, and it's overall tan color. A more exciting cover would have been nice.

[Artsy Fartsy]

the cover looks amazing the way it is 

[Godney'sSweetCheeks]

The Glory cover is fine. What matters is the quality of the tracks on there! 

[BritneyWithGlasses]

On 8/4/2016 at 12:17 AM, Asakura Hao said:

Glory looks like someone took In the Zone, Femme Fatale and Britney Jean and then mashed them up into one. It's not bad or anything, but it's just kind of not as great as I hoped it would be. Not gonna have a meltdown over it but I was sort of hoping they'd take advantage of her banging body instead of another face close-up.

that aged well...

[Towelney]

I prefer the colored one. 

[Blackout2006]

1 minute ago, Towelney said:

I prefer the colored one. 

I didnt even recognize that there was a colour version of it

[OnlyBeyonce]

[Theonetheonly]

I’m tired of the close up face look 

[Alestaos]

26 minutes ago, Theonetheonly said:

I’m tired of the close up face look 

Agreed, i wish her Album covers were more fun. Like her Circus one was awesome. But ITZ/Britney Jean/Femme Fatale/Glory feel lazy, since its basically the same cover

[GirlOnTheMoon]

On 7/16/2020 at 8:10 AM, EasyThere said:

Which one ?

Og one was beige trash,plus she looked possessed and not like herself. Than again you couldn't really see her from all that hair,being colours and the fact it was shot in front of the sun

 

 

Yeah the original one, I liked it. 
In religious terms, glory is usually associated with light and bright rays of the sun...The cover perfectly depicted that. I can understand why people don’t like it, but to me it was perfect and it matched the glorious and underappreciated masterpiece we got.