Britney Dancing In Heels @ the Circus Tour

[PolySpears]

she twirling, jumping and running in HEELS?!  

at least they look like high heels

on a side note, this is prob my fav live version of MATM

Edited July 8 by PolySpears

[Emil87]

Wearing heels really held her back when it came to her dancing. She looked hot tho.

[rebellion_is_the_way]

She’s telling that her CS shows were like a factory shutdown in her book, yet y’all drooling over bad dancing. She , herself admitted that she was punishing her enablers , long after that she realized she was actually punishing her fans with this. Go read the book before glorifying terrible times babes.

[stronger1992]

Her best tour next to Onyx. Fight me. 

[PolySpears]

31 minutes ago, stronger1992 said:

Her best tour next to Onyx. Fight me. 

onyx, tcs and dwad - holy trinity of britney tours

[Fab britney]

After being a drag queen I realized the heels she wore were made for dancing. She’s wearing dance heels. The dancing issue stems from them not wanting to grant her too much rehearsal time/earlier tours had established choreo for most songs already. In this case she was learning a whole new show from scratch including 20 new choreophies. Her 1st few shows incorporated a lot of choreo she already had down. 

[britney_rocks]

I can't get past the stiff moves and the not singing a word live. I get it now after reading her book, but at the time, I thought after seeing the DWAD Tour and Onyx Hotel, The Circus Tour really showed how much passion she had lost. The visuals were great, but the dancing was not up to Primeney. 

[trip to my touch]

2 hours ago, stronger1992 said:

Her best tour next to Onyx. Fight me. 

onyx,

dwad

femme fatale

Edited July 8 by trip to my touch

[Gypsy Woman]

6 hours ago, rebellion_is_the_way said:

She’s telling that her CS shows were like a factory shutdown in her book, yet y’all drooling over bad dancing. She , herself admitted that she was punishing her enablers , long after that she realized she was actually punishing her fans with this. Go read the book before glorifying terrible times babes.

Who is glorifying terrible times though? Commenting positively on her product(s) regardless of the person behind the mirrors is not glorifying her "dark times." If you're implying that we should not support anything that has even a hint of negativity behind her, then are we to pretend that anything she did during said times didn't exist? Furthermore, if you're willing to take that stance then are we to ignore her accomplishments too?

In other words, 1998-2007 and then RIP 2008-2021. Makes perfect logical sense.