Britney Does NOT Need A C Ship

[DiamondCircus]

Wasn't the whole point of the Free Britney movement and fans rallying around Britney to have her freedom so that she can live HER life and make HER own choices in HER life?

It's disgusting seeing people say Britney needs another C Ship for - 

Eating chicken and having a drink

For her hair not being done they way they'd like

For Britney wanting to owner her own body and pose nude

For staying at home more often than not

For her Instagram posts

Or even if she's making bad choices and decisions are still not cause for a C Ship

None of this is cause for a C Ship and anyone else on the planet that's doing the same things which his MILLIONS nobody is saying they should have their life controlled.

Stop being pressed that she isn't on some full blown world tour, working her booty off like you want and feeding the world a race horse any more.

LET HER LIVE.

We don't have to agree with her choices and everything she does but this is her life and she doesn't belong captive in a C Ship.

Edited September 14, 2023 by DiamondCircus

[PlatinumB]

Ignore those god awful accounts and users they literally have worms for brains... 

Also well said! 

Edited August 20, 2023 by PlatinumB

[DeniseVanDerBilt]

Thank you!!

[ThatsHowIRoll]

Who is saying she needs to be in a conservatorship though (other than a few Twitter trolls and IG Karen’s)?

Edited August 20, 2023 by ThatsHowIRoll

[G-unit]

Is Britney feeding herself?  Yes.

Is Britney bathing?  Yes.

Is Britney providing shelter for herself?  Yes.

Britney doesn’t need a conservatorship.  Case closed for anyone who thinks otherwise.

[DiamondCircus]

Just now, G-unit said:

Is Britney feeding herself?  Yes.

Is Britney bathing?  Yes.

Is Britney providing shelter for herself?  Yes.

Britney doesn’t need a conservatorship.  Case closed for anyone who thinks otherwise.

For real it's like the woman can't eat chicken and have a glass a wine and all of a sudden needs her life taken away again.

 

[blissfuloutsider]

6 minutes ago, G-unit said:

Is Britney feeding herself?  Yes.

Is Britney bathing?  Yes.

Is Britney providing shelter for herself?  Yes.

Britney doesn’t need a conservatorship.  Case closed for anyone who thinks otherwise.

Exactly.. idiots out there don't realize if someone can do all of the above they are able to care for themselves then they are not truly a candidate. She was drugged and files were filled out illegally on her behalf and she was prohibited from fighting for her rights. The legal system is so crooked its unreal..

[DiamondCircus]

10 minutes ago, ThatsHowIRoll said:

Who is saying she needs to be in a conservatorship though (other than a few Twitter trolls and IG Karen’s)?

Many people including users in here, when people say this is 2007 again because Britney is out getting food and having a little wine. 

[DiamondCircus]

Just now, blissfuloutsider said:

Exactly.. idiots out there don't realize if someone can do all of the above they are able to care for themselves then they are not truly a candidate. She was drugged and files were filled out illegally on her behalf and she was prohibited from fighting for her rights. The legal system is so crooked its unreal..

For real and when she's in the shower nude, people think she needs a c ship for being nude in the shower lol.

[blissfuloutsider]

People are very closed minded pearl clutches... I get her and I love her unconditionally 

[ThatsHowIRoll]

12 minutes ago, DiamondCircus said:

Many people including users in here, when people say this is 2007 again because Britney is out getting food and having a little wine. 

While I also agree that people shouldn’t police Britney, that is clearly not the same as saying that she should be in a conservatorship. Again, who is saying that on here? 1 person out of 50,000 users, if that? Receipts?

I think you should direct your message on forums like LipstickAlley or ATRL. Occasionally, I’ll see a troll justify her conservatorship on those sites but other than that, no one here is saying she should be in one. At least I haven’t come across anyone myself.

Edited August 20, 2023 by ThatsHowIRoll

[easy]

 

Never needed one, never qualified. People who say that are ableist and don't actually know what a conservatorship is. Or they just hate Britney and think a woman doing her own damn thing is bad and she needs to be controlled and abused. Either way, bad opinions from uneducated people 

[DiamondCircus]

Just now, blissfuloutsider said:

People are very closed minded pearl clutches... I get her and I love her unconditionally 

Like people are hilarious with the nudity when it comes to Britney.

For crying out oud she was topless on the cover of Rollingstone, bottomless on the cover of Esquire, nude in the Womanizer video and nude in the toxic video with just diamonds on her body.

I guess people only accept the nudity when it's her working. 

[DiamondCircus]

Just now, easy said:

 

Never needed one, never qualified. People who say that are ableist and don't actually know what a conservatorship is. Or they just hate Britney and think a woman doing her own damn thing is bad and she needs to be controlled and abused. Either way, bad opinions from uneducated people 

I agree and I felt like her topless post today in bed was a big F U to everyone, including her kids that hate she gets nude.

People are happy to take her money that comes from being **** and taking her clothes off yet clutch their pearls publicly while they're in bath houses, arcades and parks stripping down hooking up doing what they want to do. 

[Crayboy]

I was so surprised there were 20+ pages on that darn chicken and buzzball thread 😂

[DiamondCircus]

Just now, Crayboy said:

I was so surprised there were 20+ pages on that darn chicken and buzzball thread 😂

 Plus the meltdown over human nature her nips were hard and that was a huge issue. How many people up in here are having nature take it's course. 

It's hilarious how many men are clutching their pearls over Britney getting nude, having hard nips and owning her ***uality, yet they claim they deserve to have their respect in same gender marriages and relationships and be treated equally which they should, and Britney should be able too as well. 

Edited August 20, 2023 by DiamondCircus

[Gutterguppy]

1 minute ago, Crayboy said:

I was so surprised there were 20+ pages on that darn chicken and buzzball thread 😂

It was despicable the way her 'fans' were coming for her for having a drink and craving fried chicken at night...

[DiamondCircus]

Just now, Zoey102 said:

It was despicable the way her 'fans' were coming for her for having a drink and craving fried chicken at night...

For real most humans after having a break up go out with friends, the bars, the clubs or like to have a drink or go to dinners.

When Britney does it all of a sudden it's an issue. 

[Gutterguppy]

28 minutes ago, ThatsHowIRoll said:

While I also agree that people shouldn’t police Britney, that is clearly not the same as saying that she should be in a conservatorship. Again, who is saying that on here? 1 person out of 50,000 users, if that? Receipts?

I think you should direct your message on forums like LipstickAlley or ATRL. Occasionally, I’ll see a troll justify her conservatorship on those sites but other than that, no one here is saying she should be in one. At least I haven’t come across anyone myself.

there was a thread here the other week where someone asked if she'd be put back in the c-ship. People may not be explicitly saying it, but there are implications from them (as well those same people comparing what's happening now to 2007) that she may be put in one which is just ridiculous thinking 

[G-unit]

43 minutes ago, blissfuloutsider said:

Exactly.. idiots out there don't realize if someone can do all of the above they are able to care for themselves then they are not truly a candidate. She was drugged and files were filled out illegally on her behalf and she was prohibited from fighting for her rights. The legal system is so crooked its unreal..

Exactly.  People are allowed to go through struggles, no matter how severe, without having someone appointed to be their guardian making calls for them.  As long as they are meeting their immediate basic needs, they don’t need conserved.