my reaction every time i watch vma 2001

[Work_Guilty]

 iconicney at her best when will vma2016ney be this iconic  never 

 

[Army1]

2000 is better....2001's lipsynching is way more obvious and the energy of the performance is way down compared to the No Satisfaction/Oops performance (look at the audience reaction at the end of each performance as well)....2001 is all about the snake, take the snake away and its not all that special...

 

[falka]

 

59 minutes ago, Work_Guilty said:

 iconicney at her best when will vma2016ney be this iconic  never 

 

Don't believe She didn't watch it before.

I posted her vid once here  

Spoiler

Op is that You? 

[Work_Guilty]

1 hour ago, Army1 said:

2000 is better....2001's lipsynching is way more obvious and the energy of the performance is way down compared to the No Satisfaction/Oops performance (look at the audience reaction at the end of each performance as well)....2001 is all about the snake, take the snake away and its not all that special...

 

 both slays tbh god i want that brit to come back

[Work_Guilty]

1 hour ago, falka said:

 

Don't believe She didn't watch it before.

I posted her vid once here  

  Reveal hidden contents

Op is that You? 

no im not flop fan like her 

[Army1]

4 minutes ago, Work_Guilty said:

 both slays tbh god i want that brit to come back

2001 is still  a great performance, but if you were old enough to watch both live for the first time year to year, 2001 felt a little deflated from the smack in your faceness that was 2000. Any other older exhalers know what Im talking about? 

[BoyToySoldier]

2 hours ago, Army1 said:

2000 is better....2001's lipsynching is way more obvious and the energy of the performance is way down compared to the No Satisfaction/Oops performance (look at the audience reaction at the end of each performance as well)....2001 is all about the snake, take the snake away and its not all that special...

 

Imma have to disagree. 2001 was slightly better. She was in slightly better shape, the choreo was far more consistent, and the energy was not down at all sis.

Slave is a sensual song with a smooth beat, she wasn't gonna be going all out, spazzing out.

[mwilliams917]

2 hours ago, Army1 said:

2000 is better....2001's lipsynching is way more obvious and the energy of the performance is way down compared to the No Satisfaction/Oops performance (look at the audience reaction at the end of each performance as well)....2001 is all about the snake, take the snake away and its not all that special...

 

Two different songs, therefore there are two different performance approaches.  It's apples to oranges.

[onyxchief1]

I became a full out STAN after Oops! at the vma's. She was ON POINT. 2001 was still cool.

[UKasz.b]

I did not know who the *** is Britney Spears in 2001 haha

But I think that VMA 2000 was better than 2001.

One day my cousin told me 'I don't like Britney anymore. She is no longer a virgin' lol

 

[Britneybbhmm]

I don't believe that she just watched the performance in 2017! This can't be true!

[none]

On 5/7/2017 at 1:59 PM, Army1 said:

2000 is better....2001's lipsynching is way more obvious and the energy of the performance is way down compared to the No Satisfaction/Oops performance (look at the audience reaction at the end of each performance as well)....2001 is all about the snake, take the snake away and its not all that special...

 

never looked at it that way 

you make a great point, no wonder 2000 VMAs is my top Britney performance 

[Derrickr411]

It's the moment the world fell off its axis!!!! It's my absolute favorite they didn't stop talking about it until the next year when she walked out with a snake 

[popprison]

I actually appreciate the 2001 performance more now. The dancing is amazing. But all these years I've always like 2000 VMAs more in general. The energy is insane in the 2000 vma performance

[Queen_Britney]

On 2017-5-7 at 0:33 PM, Army1 said:

2001 is still  a great performance, but if you were old enough to watch both live for the first time year to year, 2001 felt a little deflated from the smack in your faceness that was 2000. Any other older exhalers know what Im talking about? 

2001 was her best VMAs performance EVER!. Her energy was just as good, but "Slave" is a "slower" R&B/Pop song... her face and body, the outfit, the dancing, the snake, the energy... Sorry, but it was clearly the best! 

[Work_Guilty]

1 hour ago, popprison said:

I actually appreciate the 2001 performance more now. The dancing is amazing. But all these years I've always like 2000 VMAs more in general. The energy is insane in the 2000 vma performance

 

3 hours ago, UKasz.b said:

I did not know who the *** is Britney Spears in 2001 haha

But I think that VMA 2000 was better than 2001.

One day my cousin told me 'I don't like Britney anymore. She is no longer a virgin' lol

 

i think 2000 is more epic but 2001 in more iconic  both are great to me