Urbanney Posted December 4, 2016 Share Posted December 4, 2016 The first one made no sense and was overly raunchy. The second one was just an advertisement and had cheesiest, most cringeworthy storyline. It was doomed from the start tbh. Link to comment
Onyx1126 Posted December 4, 2016 Share Posted December 4, 2016 A-FREAKING-MEN!!! I never understood the full drama behind people wanting the full David LaChapelle version. He is a fantastic artist but his work with the "Make Me" video is quite awful & it wouldn't have been good for him or Britney! The video was not only disjointed but Britney felt out of place in most scenes. The choreo did not have a natural flow & she looked kinda "out of it" which I can only attribute to the fact that she must not have been feeling the concepts. NOT only all of that but the outfits were all unflattering, including the red glitter in the cage (no) Link to comment
Oxic Posted December 4, 2016 Share Posted December 4, 2016 I swear to god y'all aren't satisfied with ANYTHING. Link to comment
Artsy Fartsy Posted December 4, 2016 Share Posted December 4, 2016 10 minutes ago, Oxic said: I swear to god y'all aren't satisfied with ANYTHING. I am pretty satisfied with the Slumber Party video tho Link to comment
Onyx1126 Posted December 4, 2016 Share Posted December 4, 2016 10 minutes ago, Oxic said: I swear to god y'all aren't satisfied with ANYTHING. I usually don't complain about much.. my only complaints lately are the messy hair ties lol I just can't get on board with the original MM video! In fact.. I think that a large number of fans made such a stink about a video that wasn't even good in the 1st place that they damaged the official MM video more than it should've been. Link to comment
the roof Posted December 4, 2016 Share Posted December 4, 2016 Agree. The original one was better than the official one but still had no sense. Britney looked really old, and the ******* product placement is still horrid. Link to comment
DaddyNotaFool Posted December 4, 2016 Share Posted December 4, 2016 No. The original Make Me video is a flawless masterpiece. Link to comment
mauureee Posted December 4, 2016 Share Posted December 4, 2016 how can u say it didnt make sense when u didn't watch the full thing? Link to comment
DaddyNotaFool Posted December 4, 2016 Share Posted December 4, 2016 58 minutes ago, Urbanney said: The first one made no sense and was overly raunchy. The second one was just an advertisement and had cheesiest, most cringeworthy storyline. It was doomed from the start tbh. Most of Britney Spears videos don't make any sense, since when is it important? It's not too raunchy it's exactly what I need from her. Epic, dance, *** video, starring by hot Slutney. We have not had this since 2009. It was perfect. Link to comment
Seel Posted December 4, 2016 Share Posted December 4, 2016 Agree, but we need to move on. Link to comment
prettylittleliar_2214 Posted December 4, 2016 Share Posted December 4, 2016 The G Eazy scenes in particular were trashy and cheap. The original video had potential but ultimately it would be a cluttered mess. The official video was embarrassing. Either way they ruined the lead single. Link to comment
Urbanney Posted December 4, 2016 Author Share Posted December 4, 2016 18 minutes ago, DaddyNotaFool said: Most of her videos don't make any sense, since when is it important? It's not too raunchy it's exactly what I need from her. Epic, dance, *** video, starring by hot Slutney. We have not had this since 2009. It was perfect. 31 minutes ago, mauureee said: how can u say it didnt make sense when u didn't watch the full thing? Because it was overly cluttered and in poor taste imo. First she's dancing with a shitload of guys and guys are hanging from the ceiling and making it look like they're having *** with her while she's dancing. Then she's in a pornstar looking swimsuit in a house with guys either just standing around her or working out. Then she's throwing a tv out the window into a pool. Then she's in a cage naked and covered in glitter. Then there's G-Eazy implying he's having *** with a girl when it doesn't even look realistic and he still has clothes on. And there were rumors that there were tigers on set for the video too. It just seems to make absolutely no sense, be cluttered, overly raunchy, and it would've had a bunch of product placement which would've made it look even worse. I can just see her getting slammed by the media and critics for it. Link to comment
BrittonJeanSpears Posted December 4, 2016 Share Posted December 4, 2016 It was ******* dumb. The tiger? The ******? The red bodysuit in the cage? All of that was so ******* extra and so unnecessary. Link to comment
MissSpearsSaysSo Posted December 4, 2016 Share Posted December 4, 2016 The only thing that the original vide had going for it was that Britney looked so amazing and gorgeous. The group scenes with the dancers were great. But it was all *** appeal. The "storyline" was a mess. It really made new sense. The second video is just silly and isn't much better. It's the only blemish on her otherwise perfect videography, don't even come for me to drag my love for Pretty Girls. It's super fun and slays my bussy every night. But back to MM, best parts are the hallway scenes. So glad that they released that edit on her game app. It's the best video we have for Make Me. Link to comment
Anti-Hero Posted December 4, 2016 Share Posted December 4, 2016 But glitter ****, that's iconic. Sarcasm obviously. Link to comment
Justney Posted December 4, 2016 Share Posted December 4, 2016 1 hour ago, Urbanney said: Because it was overly cluttered and in poor taste imo. First she's dancing with a shitload of guys and guys are hanging from the ceiling and making it look like they're having *** with her while she's dancing. Then she's in a pornstar looking swimsuit in a house with guys either just standing around her or working out. Then she's throwing a tv out the window into a pool. Then she's in a cage naked and covered in glitter. Then there's G-Eazy implying he's having *** with a girl when it doesn't even look realistic and he still has clothes on. And there were rumors that there were tigers on set for the video too. It just seems to make absolutely no sense, be cluttered, overly raunchy, and it would've had a bunch of product placement which would've made it look even worse. I can just see her getting slammed by the media and critics for it. But the glitter ***** alone was everything. Everything.... And honestly if you recall Toxic, that didnt make much sense either. Why did she go to all those lengths to get some poison to kill a guy who had a girl in the shower which was edited very badly--SO we had to assume the guy wronged her and she had to poison kill him while changing wigs and personas but it made NO sense. It was just a bunch of weird scenes of her doing **** and then being all naked with crystals glued on her body. Which was hella iconic. The G-easy scene was gross and could have been re-done but the dancing looked great and Britney was hot. I wish they had stuck with it but edited it down a little. She gets slammed by the media and critics no matter what she does, so at the very least we should all be able to be happy with the finished product as fans. Link to comment
Charbok Posted December 4, 2016 Share Posted December 4, 2016 1 hour ago, BrittonJeanSpears said: The tiger? It was a Leopard! Sorry but it's my favorite animal and it ain't no freaking tiger! Link to comment
BrittonJeanSpears Posted December 4, 2016 Share Posted December 4, 2016 Just now, Charbok said: It was a Leopard! Sorry but it's my favorite animal and it ain't no freaking tiger! A jungle cat. Better? Link to comment
buffington Posted December 4, 2016 Share Posted December 4, 2016 In the words of Britney haself "I don't like it!!" I trust her judgment, and the clips looked like a weird, random E! Entertainment reality show sized mess. SP on the other hand, is a masterpiece. MM still slays tho, and it did not deserve this mess. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.