Britney needs to stop with the sponsors in her music videos

[itsjosiebitch]

I have a question: How does it work? Does she get payed by how many seconds/times she shows the product? I ask this because she put the eos thing so many times in the video, why so many times? And she should stick with makeup, jewelry because gym ads are way too random unless the song is about fitness lol

[IUSM]

54 minutes ago, Rich Beach said:

There is no need to stop all that sponsor-thing as long as the video content is good imo. But i think they should stick with 2-3 ads, one of which will be Britney`s perfume 

Just noticed that Make Me...  is not even showing her latest perfume.

[GemmaTeller]

For real especially the Penos lip balms those are so 2013. And can some irrelevant company I've never heard of like the orange exercise whatever it was even afford to pay a lot for this? It probably wasn't even a lot of money so that's sooooo not worth it.

[Avnit]

Agreed although Hold it against me was perfect tho the massive product placement 

[L'Erbolario]

The problem with MM music video is that advertisement is so ******* obvious. That orange thing makes me cringe.

[Archie]

35 minutes ago, itsjosiebitch said:

I have a question: How does it work? Does she get payed by how many seconds/times she shows the product? I ask this because she put the eos thing so many times in the video, why so many times? And she should stick with makeup, jewelry because gym ads are way too random unless the song is about fitness lol

The sponsors invest money in the video and in payment the artist has to show the label a few seconds of the product/service. So instead of the artist show the label all in one time, they divide the ad throughout the video. In this case EOS probably was the biggest sponsor and had the right to most seconds in the video. Got it?

 

I think RCA don't invest that much on Britney that's why she had to look for sponsorship to her videos or she'd have cheap videos and y'all would be complaining anyway.

[noah fence]

I don't mind her having sponsors bc girl gotta get her coin, but she makes is so blatant and cringeworthy 

[UnyewsualYew]

Remember Womanizer with the Nokia phone? I didn't actually realise that was product placement for a few turns of watching! That's how it should be done.

MM/PG is so blatant and ridic 

[On the Scene]

I'm trying to figure who's bright idea it was for Britney to put on the Eos twice. Especially right after she had *** with that random guy. Like what a way to end a music video....

[Draw The Blinds]

Just the fact that during one of my favorite lines from the song "No shame in the game just cut the **** be honest" there is an ad for Orangetheory really pisses me off.  The product placement is so cringe-worthy and embarrassing

 

Team B has been OVER using sponsors since Hold It Against Me & I'm over of it. Britney is an icon, not a d-list singer 

[Guest willysilva]

2 hours ago, BritBreakitDown20 said:

because its HER product and it fits perfectly with the whole concept 

her perfumes product placement were always on point and britney looks gorgeous in all the scenes 

and the earrings?

[Kiey]

3 minutes ago, willysilva said:

and the earrings?

I actually wanted to buy those earings after i watched it the first time

thats how a product placement should be done

iconic as ****

[Cappycorn87]

Every artist has product placement in their videos, that's how these videos get paid for hun.

[Looukas]

2 hours ago, matt88 said:

I agree, like one of her perfume is ok, but ad after ad after ad... like seriously ??

When it comes to sponsors, HIAM and MM are disgusting... 

What are you talking about? HIAM was very subtle

 

[saicis]

I agree. What other legends use it so heavily?

Like come on, it's every single video and it's so tacky and corporate. 

 

44 minutes ago, On the Scene said:

I'm trying to figure who's bright idea it was for Britney to put on the Eos twice. Especially right after she had *** with that random guy. Like what a way to end a music video....

I know, it's cringeworthy.

[Guest willysilva]

2 minutes ago, Looukas said:

What are you talking about? HIAM was very subtle

 

[Steel Magnolia]

I blame the conservatorship. Sorry, but so many of the things that fans are complaining about can be traced back to that.

Her entire brand has been affected by how frugal and uptight Jamie and the lawyers are. It's sad. 

23 minutes ago, willysilva said:

OMG! I honestly never noticed that before!

That is product placement that is well done.

[Steel Magnolia]

2 hours ago, Archie said:

I think RCA don't invest that much on Britney that's why she had to look for sponsorship to her videos or she'd have cheap videos and y'all would be complaining anyway.

That's a great point.

The less relevant she becomes with her music, the more she has to use sponsors to pay for her videos. The FF and BJ eras really hurt her. 

[Guest willysilva]

12 minutes ago, Steel_Magnolia said:

I blame the conservatorship. Sorry, but so many of the things that fans are complaining about can be traced back to that.

Her entire brand has been affected by how frugal and uptight Jamie and the lawyers are. It's sad. 

OMG! I honestly never noticed that before!

That is product placement that is well done.

the plenty of fish part though :rip:

[BratzBitch]

That's not really her fault, it's her label that doesn't want to invest that much in her so they use sponsors