(glory) celebuzz review is in

[neydelina]

B+ / 83

 

''The album breaks no new ground either sonically or lyrically, but that’s fine; one does not come to Britney Spears to encounter the avant-garde. Still, some of these songs are experimental within the context of Spears’ oeuvre. ''

 

 

''Released early 20 years into her career, Glory is better than most of us thought it would be. More impressively, it is better than it has any right or need to be, given the phases of life and career Spears now finds herself. Its greatness serves as a reminder: when it comes to pop greats, you can count them down but never out. ''

 

http://www.celebuzz.com/2016-08-22/britney-spears-glory-album-review/?utm_campaign=Echobox&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter#link_time=1471892444

[mihailtodorovsky]

 

 

'The album breaks no new ground either sonically or lyrically

Stopped reading here tbh 

[BritBot]

Nice, only slightly shady.. (Breaking no new ground lyrically or sonically? Not Avant-Garde? Plz point me in the direction of all the other US Pop b*tches singing entire songs in french )

[BenDBitch]

They were shady but 83 is amazing !! Better than Circus and FF.... Will this be displayed on Metacritic ?

[glorytotheworld]

Eh. It's just some random celeb site.

 

They can have several seats with their basic review

And its AP about 10 million times tbh

 

[LilyRoseAllen]

The critics are not fair with Britney. Just take a look at her metacritic scores/ LMFAO when you see that the critics preferred Circus over Blackout...

BOMT : no score, Metacritic was launched in July 1999.

Oops : 72

Britney : 58

ITZ : 66

Blackout : 61 

Circus : 64 

FF : 67 

BJ : 50

 

Like seriously...