Bad reviews for GLORY (receipts inside)

[really really cool guy]

11 minutes ago, bog.bhs said:

uhm...

http://www.metacritic.com/

frank ocean's Blond got a 90? all of the songs sound the same and the production is almost non existant  

he didn't even bother to change his voice or play with it 

[bog.bhs]

9 minutes ago, Caca said:

lip syncing is the answer I think

If the music is GOOD they should write a favorable review   and HOW ON EARTH could they say that her vocals are overprocessed??? Maybe they were listening to Banana Joe

[bog.bhs]

2 minutes ago, really really cool guy said:

frank ocean's Blond got a 90? all of the songs sound the same and the production is almost non existant  

he didn't even bother to change his voice or play with it 

I didn`t even bother to listen to his album tbh. I have a better album to listen to 

[Guest]

24 minutes ago, really really cool guy said:

this reviews count for metacritic? 

No.  

[Guest]

Cleveland C+ (70p+) not bad lol. 

[Lou M. Taylor]

The cleveland one doesn't count towards Metacritic I'm pretty sure.

[PraiseQueenBrit]

Just two points to drag you:

1. Stop focusing on the negativity when these sites are completely irrelevant.

2. Metacritic score still remains the same, with the only magazine being Slant Magazine giving a rating. 

No one knows these magazines, do you think the industry gives a **** about the Toronto Sun? Might as well be Robert Leich giving a review for the Las Vegas Sun. A joke in the eyes of serious musical criticism. 

[Dark Prerogative]

Quoting Britney, those two reviewers can suck my toe

[PraiseQueenBrit]

Just now, button said:

The cleveland one doesn't count towards Metacritic I'm pretty sure.

neither cleveland or toronto sun do, they are irrelevant

[SamanthaBailey]

They biased.  Just cuz she pretty and happy they shade ha  you know if some depressed basic ***** like lorde or demo sang this they'd be saying it the best album eva 

[Guest]

1 minute ago, button said:

The cleveland one doesn't count towards Metacritic I'm pretty sure.

So is the other. (Toronto sun) 

[jokobish]

because these ******* writers are gay as well and are probably beyonce stans.

[wholenewway]

32 minutes ago, Caca said:

could you guys focus on that Slant magazine (which the only review that counts towards the metacritic points at the moment) has given it the same rating as for Lemonade?

Wow that is actually pretty crazy. Slay. 

[prettylittleliar_2214]

17 minutes ago, PraiseQueenBrit said:

Just two points to drag you:

1. Stop focusing on the negativity when these sites are completely irrelevant.

2. Metacritic score still remains the same, with the only magazine being Slant Magazine giving a rating. 

No one knows these magazines, do you think the industry gives a **** about the Toronto Sun? Might as well be Robert Leich giving a review for the Las Vegas Sun. A joke in the eyes of serious musical criticism. 

Exactly we should ignore them.

[Guest]

Okay I'm scared af after I googled the guy who wrote the article about bashing Glory

This is literally the pic the Toronto Sun has of him

[DJSLAYZEE]

This is coming from the Candian National Enquirer and some random blog in Cleaveland, Ohio  thanks for the input guys! We'll make sure to take note of it lol

[DJSLAYZEE]

27 minutes ago, jokobitch said:

because these ******* writers are gay as well and are probably beyonce stans.

Most of exhale is gay as hell. I hate when people use gay instead of stupid or bad

[bog.bhs]

4 minutes ago, Blackout_Boy said:

Okay I'm scared af after I googled the guy who wrote the article about bashing Glory

This is literally the pic the Toronto Sun has of him

Holy ****! Now I understand why he doesn't get Britney's music 

[softskeleton]

Most reviewers (especially random websites like those two) are exceedingly biased when it comes to her so it really doesn't surprise me. We love the record, SHE loves her record and that's what matters. Let's wait for the REAL critics to review the album.

[hleeeee]

They're just jealous of her success.