Britneysource01: RCA/Sony Music intends to sue David LaChepelle

[div]

what are we hoes wating to burn david on twitter or something? 

[WerkB¡tch]

10 hours ago, If U Seek Me said:

Can't Britney's Team sue itself instead?

Even if LaChapelle is in the wrong, he is not the one who released the garbage that is now on her VEVO channel.

(I wish Team Britney would talk to us. I am tired of all these "insiders" posts/tweets).

And what the fuc you want?

Glory is three weeks away from the release date, we all were asking for the music video, Make Me needed a mv, if they wouldn't release a second option video we all were mad and pressed telling them why didn't she record another video?

duuuuh

 

[srestr]

I find it funny how this LaChappelle guy can be so up his own ***. He's just trying to protect his "art". The video is okay, I guess, but it's no masterpiece. Let the ***** handle her era right, okay? Douche. 

[xzede25]

11 hours ago, G L O R Y said:

Will this mess ever end? 

 

[xzede25]

3 hours ago, veronicaspuffy said:

 

Info by https://twitter.com/nickosfassas/with_replies

 

Glory comercial or VMA'S aanouncement 

[lightspark]

Another day, another drama.  

[Antidote]

No mainpage yet?

[BABY BEATRIZ]

15 hours ago, G L O R Y said:

Will this mess ever end? 

omgggg

[Toxic.Latin]

omg sometimes i think this was all planned like... something fishy is going on.... maybe we are gonna have to wait and see.

I still have faith the original video will be released.

 

[overprotectedd]

https://www.change.org/p/rca-records-sme-release-the-original-music-video-for-make-me-by-britney-spears

[Antidote]

7 hours ago, Young Törless said:

Britney:

 

Body double with a wig (this was shoot in another room, without her permission)

[Steel Magnolia]

If this is true then Britney should pay off the sponsors so that David can deliver his video.

Why in the world would they pay for the video with sponsorship money anyways? For a Lachapelle video?

Does every pop star do that these days? 

[Derek08]

16 hours ago, If U Seek Me said:

Can't Britney's Team sue itself instead?

Even if LaChapelle is in the wrong, he is not the one who released the garbage that is now on her VEVO channel.

(I wish Team Britney would talk to us. I am tired of all these "insiders" posts/tweets).

The video is on the same level as every other artists videos. You guys act like not a girl not yet a woman is a masterpiece and that was during her "prime". The video shows off her personality and she looks gorgeous. Nothing more and nothing less

[Steel Magnolia]

What I'm getting at is her team is notoriously cheap.

[Steel Magnolia]

6 hours ago, Young Törless said:

I'm more interested in the "without Britney's permission" part.

I've been floating this theory for days now, but there was always too much emotion going on for anyone to notice.

I thought this part was very interesting, if true. 

[Steel Magnolia]

Maybe David had to do re-shoots? And he just used a wine room instead of a beige room because he was on a tight schedule or because he didn't give a **** anymore?

[kevin.]

But also in the first shot the tv is on the floor. 

[Laurien]

The red wall is symbolism, it's intended. The red wall when she decides to throw the tv out and the red paint after she did it.  i need that video!

[Steel Magnolia]

15 hours ago, Draw The Blinds said:

They should work with Kidzbop then, not Britney Spears.

The problem is, Britney has been very vanilla since 2008. And then suddenly for this era she wasn't.

EDIT: What if Britney shot the second video just to keep the sponsors happy? And they'll eventually release David's version with new sponsors? 

[Rico.]

26 minutes ago, Derek08 said:

The video is on the same level as every other artists videos. You guys act like not a girl not yet a woman is a masterpiece and that was during her "prime". The video shows off her personality and she looks gorgeous. Nothing more and nothing less

the video is cute, it's just really not worth a Britney lead single