Jump to content

Britneysource01: RCA/Sony Music intends to sue David LaChepelle

DaddyNotaFool

By DaddyNotaFool
in Britney Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 143
  • Created
  • Last Reply
shap_half Apprentice

shap_half

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Draw The Blinds said:

I just explained the comparison :NYheadache: They are both big artists who can afford it.

And I'm saying bringing up Beyonce is unnecessary. You could make the point without comparing Britney to Beyonce. Because I imagine that it's not so much about Beyonce but about "artistic blah-blah". And the larger point I was originally making goes beyond this video comment. Beyonce comparisons are rampant round these parts,a nd it's annoying and desperate. 

Link to comment
Draw The Blinds Enthusiast

Draw The Blinds

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, shap_half said:

And I'm saying bringing up Beyonce is unnecessary. You could make the point without comparing Britney to Beyonce. Because I imagine that it's not so much about Beyonce but about "artistic blah-blah". And the larger point I was originally making goes beyond this video comment. Beyonce comparisons are rampant round these parts,a nd it's annoying and desperate. 

I'm done trying to talk to a brick wall :beynah:

Link to comment
Mr.J Rookie

Mr.J

Posted
Posted

This whole mess is effing stupid. I seriously HATE the official video we got. It's embarrassing and absolutely crap.

Why couldn't they just hire a nice hotel room and film something in there? Nice and basic. Would have been way more fitting with the mood of the song. Would have been cheaper to do that too. 

Link to comment
Chico101 Collaborator

Chico101

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, PlayingItSafe said:

If this is true, I'm disgusted. Britney and her team siding with a sponsor over a respected director's artistic vision, which Brit was fully signed up to? Money trumps everything for Team Britney and I hope this isn't the real reason the vid got ditched. 

What you said make no sense. Of course she has to side with the sponsors - THEY PROVIDED MONEY FOR THE VIDEO. She's under contractual obligation to advertise them. If they aren't happy with the scenes then they will essentially pull the plug, they don't pay, David doesn't get paid and then David withholds his work.

David is the one screwing them over here.

Link to comment
coo Contributor

coo

Posted
Posted

i'm starting to think there's more to this story tbh. it could be there is some scene that is so outrageous they can't possibly allow him to release it. maybe somebody got ran over and scrambled apart in the bulldozer scene :dontlike:

Link to comment
marrecarney Contributor

marrecarney

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, BratzBitch said:

I'm so done with insiders tbh :icant2: Why do people waste their time on the internet pretending to be insiders? That's pathetic AF :drinky:

 

He's not even an insider, it's just dumb people who choose to believe everything on internet and then trolls and idiots become insiders.

Link to comment
goincrazy4brit Experienced

goincrazy4brit

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Chico101 said:

What you said make no sense. Of course she has to side with the sponsors - THEY PROVIDED MONEY FOR THE VIDEO. She's under contractual obligation to advertise them. If they aren't happy with the scenes then they will essentially pull the plug, they don't pay, David doesn't get paid and then David withholds his work.

David is the one screwing them over here.

i agree!:bigtime:

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go To Topic Listing
×
×
  • Create New...