-
-
Recently Browsing
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
New comments
-
"Insider". Sure. To be honest, I can't imagine it's very good. Written so fast, while her emotions were high. I think the legal implications could be minimal. For one thing, she had Rosenberg, and even if he didn't negotiate the contract, he probably found someone good. Having court actions would have influenced the terms. Also, it's very possible that no corporation is going to take on the optics of suing Britney Spears, at least not for a long time. There's a good chance the publisher went into it with a pragmatic attitude..."if not now, later is fine". -
By Joshyworld · Posted
Thank you. I am so sick of these libtard stans who like to pretend this is about gender bias. It’s not. If Maluma began posting/spamming LQ and cryptic ***** every other day on his Instagram, people would absolutely judge him. Britney built a huge part of her career off showing skin. Being nude is not the issue. It’s simply the execution. I can’t believe some fans are continuing to fight tooth and nail to prove otherwise. -
-
-
-
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.