I'm a photographer and the cover is very artsy fartsy

[PRIVATE.SHOW]

The problems that it's not HD, you can't see her eyebrows and her skin color seems weird. It looks like she doesn't have a neck at that angle. It's also grainy and too dark. The font looks cheap, the text should've been at the bottom (album name only). Just change it ffs, there should be more than enough photos and time.

[MakeMeBritneyOh]

5 minutes ago, DaddySayzee said:

We should collab, the nose ring one gives me FKA Twigs vibes

saycsarfleurima.tumblr.com

I love to

http://www.ortizlunapablo.com/

[wut]

16 minutes ago, jrsn21 said:

I'm a photographer too and I think it's absolutely amateur

It's both not clear and not blurry enough to achieve either "glory" or "artsy" approach

It just looks more like a video shoot capture.

Agreed. It looks like a fullbody photo that has been cropped to the face, or like you said, a video shoot capture. The text looks slapped on too

[MakeMeBritneyOh]

11 minutes ago, really really cool guy said:

I like your pictures a lot  

 

thank u 

u can check them http://www.ortizlunapablo.com/

I wish i can portrait Britney

[Passengerney]

I agree with you, the font could've been better but it's ok, I like the cover. There are more important things like the music people, so... 

[jrsn21]

5 minutes ago, MakeMeBritneyOh said:

if u're a photographer then u know there's no rules so blurry o clear or in the meddle its does´t matter only matter what the photographer wants to show and his point of view

if u're a photographer then u know there's no rules so blurry o clear or in the meddle its does´t matter only matter what the photographer wants to show and his point of view

There is no rules on the blurriness of a portrait in general, but there ARE rules in capturing it for an album cover, and this close-up missed it.

It's not hard to still capture the subject against the light source in the background and still make her glow. I see your works look great, so I don't get how you can compliment on the cover.

If like you said the photographer wants to show his point of view, I don't see it. 

 

Anyways, arguing don't change anything, stop taking sides on a freaking photo and preorder the album! 

[SwaggedyAndy]

26 minutes ago, DaddySayzee said:

I keep seeing JLO, no shade but JLO might have a simile cover 

There is a photo in the booklet from ITZ that looks just like J.Lo. 

[MakeMeBritneyOh]

1 minute ago, Passengerney said:

I agree with you, the font could've been better but it's ok, I like the cover. There are more important things like the music people, so... 

well yeah the fonts is a matter of taste, I mean you can love an sans serif (as I do) or a serif , thats change person to person.

[Puppy]

25 minutes ago, DaddySayzee said:

I keep seeing JLO, no shade but JLO might have a simile cover 

OMG now I can't unsee her as Jlo 

[PBoy]

33 minutes ago, If U Seek Me said:

Says the "photographer" with the blurry profile picture.

LOOOOOOOOOL!

 

I Live for these comments

[MakeMeBritneyOh]

4 minutes ago, jrsn21 said:

There is no rules on the blurriness of a portrait in general, but there ARE rules in capturing it for an album cover, and this close-up missed it.

It's not hard to still capture the subject against the light source in the background and still make her glow. I see your works look great, so I don't get how you can compliment on the cover.

If like you said the photographer wants to show his point of view, I don't see it. 

 

Anyways, arguing don't change anything, stop taking sides on a freaking photo and preorder the album! 

so based in what u said something like this is wronge wich is one of the most amazing album covers i ever seen

or well something more pop like this

[Britneylandia]

i don't understand why people doesn't like it.. her face looks perfect 

[Daredevil]

THIS IS HORRENDOUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I CANT BELIEVE IT IS OFFICIAL

[MakeMeBritneyOh]

1 minute ago, Britneylandia said:

i don't understand why people doesn't like it.. her face looks perfect 

they're basic, they dont get art

[jrsn21]

9 minutes ago, MakeMeBritneyOh said:

so based in what u said something like this is wronge wich is one of the most amazing album covers i ever seen

or well something more pop like this

 

You are reaching and being delusional. Notice the framing, the distance, and the degree of blurriness . They are CLEARLY not the same thing as the Glory cover, where the target imo is to capture the glow on Britney close-up.

Taking great photos does not equal good analyzing skills, so don't just believing that you're the only one who can "see" the cover.

Anyways, let's move on from this nonsense.

[Soni]

1 hour ago, MakeMeBritneyOh said:

I loggin with my old twitter account, and it takes that pic. 

This are some of my work bb

 

Who is the 3rd guy

[xzede25]

i love it tbh

[Greyson]

1 hour ago, HugoJean said:

I don't know why this is even debatable like I'd rather a picture of an ******* than that cover. 

I screamed because it's true  

[MakeMeBritneyOh]

9 minutes ago, Soni said:

Who is the 3rd guy

my boyfriend the other ones are models

enjoy :P

This is when we meet

this is resent

well to be honest we're apart ( like 2 weeks now)  but its matter of time i think 

we love each other, I just have to call him and say Im quit being a "womanizer" 

 

[GirlOnTheMoon]

1 hour ago, MakeMeBritneyOh said:

I think its reflect exactly the way she describe the album

the blury and light are very moody, chill. Its really reflect 

some kind of slow tempo music.

the granulated is just on point, and she looks good the hair is perfect.

u guys want some obvious cover but I think its just the way the album sound.

 

 

I agree with you... this cover is beautiful! So ethereal and yet so ****... It's very inviting.