Why on earth do you want two videos to be panned? Seriously, why??!!!

[Red_B86]

Everything you hate about the oficial version you would have hated about the original version

1. product placement

2. stupid concept/story

3. overly ******/tacky

4. G-eazy is white (read that one in the comments of the oficial video )

But seriously the original video won't save this and would mean an even bigger mess cause you'd have to deal with two awful videos

From what we've seen from the leaked scenes, it's an illuminati mess, I totally get it why Britney fought it so hard... she is not a sellout

 

And let's not forget Britney herself, she is SOOOO good in this video, her attitude, her confidence, her playfulness, her body, she is there! This is my grain of salt! 

I think this video/concept would have been great for the delicious Private Show

I'll keep tripping on my Glory pre order and hating that stupid cover

[theraspberry]

Yes! I said it in another thread but the only thing I prefer from the second video is the colours and dancing. Rest is tacky.

The new video is a little dull and wont be remembered but she looks great lol.

[Legend]

Everything about this video is cheap, from the editing to these fake *** cackling girls that give me a headache. It's one of her worst videos, and it's a LEAD SINGLE MUSIC VIDEO. This video doesn't even promote the song

The original version had more choreography, it was sexier, and it had Lacapelle as the director (HE IS LEGENDARY). It looks artistic, the product placement isn't as obvious, and the concept for the video isn't tacky. SIGN THE PETITION PEOPLE

[carlitos'crib]

12 minutes ago, BritneyRocksMe said:

Everything about this video is cheap, from the editing to these fake *** cackling girls that give me a headache. It's one of her worst videos, and it's a LEAD SINGLE MUSIC VIDEO. This video doesn't even promote the song

The original version had more choreography, it was sexier, and it had Lacapelle as the director (HE IS LEGENDARY). It looks artistic, the product placement isn't as obvious, and the concept for the video isn't tacky. SIGN THE PETITION PEOPLE

wheres the petition?
 I wanna sign it

[Legend]

Just now, carlitos'crib said:

wheres the petition?
 I wanna sign it

Here ya go:

https://www.change.org/p/rca-records-sme-release-the-original-music-video-for-make-me-by-britney-spears?recruiter=363092024&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=share_twitter_responsive

Make a change, we need the original

[Red_B86]

9 minutes ago, BritneyRocksMe said:

Everything about this video is cheap, from the editing to these fake *** cackling girls that give me a headache. It's one of her worst videos, and it's a LEAD SINGLE MUSIC VIDEO. This video doesn't even promote the song

The original version had more choreography, it was sexier, and it had Lacapelle as the director (HE IS LEGENDARY). It looks artistic, the product placement isn't as obvious, and the concept for the video isn't tacky. SIGN THE PETITION PEOPLE

Sexier?

This flawless song doesn't need a pseudo **** scene(s) in the music video, it just doen't!

Just because he is "legendary" doesn't mean he can't have bad or AWFUL ideas like to have Britney as a paid ***** you can just put your c*ck in and **** (the song itself is a love and *** song not a bad porno song)

I'm thinking about creating a petition to keep it shelved!

[BABY BEATRIZ]

[Guest]

the scrapped mess was no only Britney's fault.... Sure it was La Chapelle's faults too... stop blaming only to Britney, that we heard, when she says 'I DON'T LIKE IT' during the shoot...

[Legend]

Just now, Red_B86 said:

Sexier?

This flawless song doesn't need a pseudo **** scene(s) in the music video, it just doen't!

Just because he is "legendary" doesn't mean he can't have bad or AWFUL ideas like to have Britney as a paid ***** you can just put your c*ck in and **** (the song itself is a love and *** song not a bad porno song)

I'm thinking about creating a petition to keep it shelved!

Yes it was sexier.

This video's concept literally has nothing to do with the song. The "***" scene is so random it makes no sense.

I'm pretty sure the original wasnt like that, don't exaggerate. It was controversial yes, but it wasn't any raunchier than Anaconda or Wrecking Ball. 

This video is mess, we all know it

The only saving grace about this video is that she looks like a flawless goddess 

[Red_B86]

5 minutes ago, BritneyRocksMe said:

Yes it was sexier.

This video's concept literally has nothing to do with the song. The "***" scene is so random it makes no sense.

I'm pretty sure the original wasnt like that, don't exaggerate. It was controversial yes, but it wasn't any raunchier than Anaconda or Wrecking Ball. 

This video is mess, we all know it

The only saving grace about this video is that she looks like a flawless goddess 

Idk man, to me slave4u is **** as **** and never tacky

The "***" scene is just ****** up, you see women in that kinda situation in a Tarantino movie, I hate that scene so much, you don't even see her face, that's not **** that is a low budget porno that features a ugly woman

Anaconda and wrecking ball are earlier versions of ****$, don't like 'em

And yes, she does look great in lots of ways

 

[Red_B86]

14 minutes ago, Mauricio22 said:

the scrapped mess was no only Britney's fault.... Sure it was La Chapelle's faults too... stop blaming only to Britney, that we heard, when she says 'I DON'T LIKE IT' during the shoot...

Exactly, she never really wanted that for the video... I'm pretty sure she prefers this rushed mess rather than the original one