Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'free britney'.

  • Search By Tags

    NEW! Separate tags with commas (example: Britney Spears, Lady Gaga, music video).
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Discussions
    • Music News
    • Britney Spears
    • Entertainment
    • Politics & Global News
    • Fitness, Health & Lifestyle
    • Personal Finance
    • LGBTQ+
    • Tech
    • General
    • Mental Health
    • Exhale members only
  • Exhale
    • Announcements
    • Ask a question
    • Suggestions
    • Forum Support

Categories

  • Britney Spears
  • Camila Cabello
  • Creators
  • Hilary Duff
  • Justin Bieber
  • Katy Perry
  • Kesha
  • Lady Gaga
  • Madonna
  • Rihanna
  • Thirst Traps
  • Pussycat Dolls

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


Interests

  1. Update: TMZ is doubling down on their claims that Britney wants to tell the judge on June 23rd that she wants her father out of the picture, but reportedly won't request the conservatorship to end. "Sources with direct knowledge tell TMZ ... Britney does not feel trapped in the 13-year-old conservatorship. As one source put it, 'She has 99% of the freedom she'd have if she weren't in a conservatorship, and the only thing she's prevented from doing are crazy things, like buying 3 cars at a time [something she tried to do back in the day].'" They also add that "Britney is aware her life was out of control before the conservatorship was put in place, and it created a structure and also replenished her dwindling assets. As one source put it, 'She's taken care of and she knows it.'" TMZ also says that Britney is angry with her father and they aren't speaking. One of those reasons is "over business issues and certain people Jamie embraced on the team ... people Britney doesn't like because she feels they were motivated not by her self-interest but theirs." She wants Jamie removed as conservator over her estate. She reportedly has no problem with Jodi Montgomery, the woman who is Britney's current conservator over her person. Britney won't perform until her father is removed. ------ Earlier (April 28, 2021): Britney is asking to address the court directly, and she'll get her chance on June 23rd. According to a new report from TMZ, Britney wants to tell the judge she wants her father to have no official involvement in her life. They say she is angry at him and has had virtually no interaction with him. Part of that stems from his absence during her upbringing. Now he's "present," but of course when there's money at stake. TMZ claims their source, who has direct knowledge of the situation, is unsure of what specifically Britney wants to tell the judge, but that it's likely she'll ask he's removed as conservator. Britney won't perform until he's out. However, even if he's removed, that doesn't mean she'll hit the stage any time soon. From TMZ: "We're told Britney has not expressed a desire to end the conservatorship, but it's almost certain that issue will be addressed when she appears before the judge ... addressed either by Britney or the judge." They add: "Our sources say ... expect a wide-ranging discussion between the judge and Britney. And, unless they talk about her medical condition, the hearing should be open to the media and the public ... and everyone can even jump on zoom and watch the hearing." Related:
  2. According to official court documents, Britney Spears’s net worth is between 50-60 million dollars. Although this is still a considerable amount, it’s much lower than expected for a pop star and performer with a successful career spanning over 2 decades. I mean Rihanna, Miley Cyrus, Justin Bieber, and Lady Gaga have not been in the industry as long as her and yet, they have all accumulated a net worth of over 100 million dollars. Britney has sold many records, the majority of which have been certified gold multiple times. The albums she released between 1999-2003 broke the charts. I remember that her second album was sold out at my local wal-mart the week that it was released! Her fragrances and endorsement deals (e.g. Pepsi) were also very lucrative. Bryan Spears said that her fragrance line apparently made $100 billion...although, he probably exaggerated and meant to say 100 million. All those concert tours were extremely popular...more so than her rivals like Christina Aguilera and Justin Timberlake(boo!). I remember that she performed in my hometown as part of the dream within a dream tour and tickets sold out 6 months before the scheduled concert (I managed to get a ticket and see it!). Of course, there’s the Vegas residency. This was one of the more lucrative endeavors for Britney. She spent 4 years performing in Vegas and also landed more concerts and performances across the country. Britney must have been earning 500,000 per show. She should have earned over 100 million from the residency alone. I mean, Celine Dion performed exclusively in Vegas for 16 years and now has a net worth of 600 million. Now, taking all this into consideration, how is her net worth only 50-60 million. Given all that she has accomplished over her career, Britney’s net worth should be well over 300 million. I simply don’t understand where the money has gone. I believe she signed a pre-nup when she married Kevin Federaline. He definitely did not get much from her. Even if she’s paying him spousal and child support, it shouldn’t be a huge dent in her bank account. Britney is known for her shopping sprees...but she tends to spend her money at stores like Target and JCPenny. It’s not like she’s buying $100,000 fur coats and jewelry. People claim that the conservatorship has drained her finances...I don’t believe it. Isn’t the goal of this whole thing to preserve her fortune and help it grow? This could be another conspiracy...where is her money going? Who is getting it? I’m very shocked and sad for her. She has worked so hard for so long. Britney deserves to have a net worth that represents all the time, effort, and success in this crazy entertainment industry.
  3. I swear to god big moves better be made tomorrow by Ingham What are you expecting/hoping for tomorrow's hearing?
  4. I haven’t seen this reported anywhere else, but according to That Surprise Witness, Lynne has just filed an objection to Vivian’s legal fees?! UPDATE: Lynne's attorney says if Vivian's 'media matters' were not done in good faith for the benefit of the Conservatee (Britney) the costs she is requesting should be disallowed and immediately be re-paid to Britney's estate. Lynne's attorney also states it appears Vivian's fees were paid without question. They request the fees are closely examined. They also state that Jamie hired Vivian for litigation purposes and on her instruction there was no mention of her also dealing with media matters, so why is Vivian charging for media appearances that may not even been needed in the first place. They also question why the rates are so high and why over $200k was for media matters. They make a big emphasis on the fees being high and to be returned immediately to Britney's estate and for these bills to be closely examined. They state these high fees do NOT benefit Britney's estate. Lynne has also said that Vivian's media tour had NO benefit to Britney and was not authorised by the court. Related:
  5. Britney's father Jamie claims he's "working extensively" to "minimize any harm" the Free Britney movement has done to Britney's career. Even though Britney's streams are way, way up... In new court docs, Mr. Spears lists his monthly salary at a whopping $16,000 a month salary and an extra $2,000 a month to maintain an office. He says he works “extensively with Ms. Spears’ team and my attorneys to monitor social media and address negative and potentially destructive publicity, and minimise any harm to Ms. Spears’ brand”. He also claims being Britney's full-time conservator requires him to “keep current regarding the music, advertising, and entertainment business, in the areas of financial investing and investments, and in legal matters, for Ms. Spears’ benefit”. In addition, he has spent a “significant amount of time” on her “investments”, adding: “I participated in extensive communications with various advisors and industry experts in analysing and modifying investment strategies to address changes in Ms. Spears’ working status and fluctuations in the economy.” The conservatorship case also takes up his time. “I spoke regularly with my conservatorship counsel to stay informed of the matters in the ongoing conservatorship proceeding, including reviewing all pleadings filed in the conservatorship, and preparing for and appearing at all hearings.” Jamie is asking the judge to approve the compensation for his work. Related:
  6. The California Senate Judiciary Committee passed SB-724 by unanimous consent! They didn’t even have to vote during the hearing because all of the state Senators already. This bill makes it clear that conservatees have the right to choose and change legal council at any time. See how you can help below. All of the Britney references in this speech Related:
  7. Judge Penny has granted the ex parte motion allowing Britney's father to keep Michael Kane from Miller Kaplan as the business manager while Bessemer Trust is still being added to the conservatorship. Michael Kane was also involved in MJ's estate. It appears this would bet yet another life-changing decision made for Britney without her express consent.
  8. Britney Spears' life “would drastically change for the better” if her father was removed as her conservator, insiders tell Page Six. Last week, Britney's court-appointed attorney filed to have a woman named Jodi Montgomery replace Britney's father as the conservator over her person in perpetuity. The insider told Page Six, “If Jodi becomes her conservator things would drastically change for Britney — she’s not working because of her dad. She has said that as long as a dad is in control of her life, she’s not working. “Britney trusts Jodi Montgomery — she’s really great. Things would drastically change for the better.” The insider told Page Six, “If Jodi becomes her conservator things would drastically change for Britney — she’s not working because of her dad. She has said that as long as a dad is in control of her life, she’s not working. “Britney trusts Jodi Montgomery — she’s really great. Things would drastically change for the better.” As for the rumored Oprah interview, the source added, “If she decided she wanted to do it, yes, but it definitely wouldn’t do it in the current status quo. As long as her dad is part of it, she’s not working. She hasn’t talked to her dad in over a year.” Related:
  9. I got a lot of notifications on Twitter today. Went to check what the fuss was all about and it was this Tweet I posted in 2012 during my trip to Italy. Totally forgot that this happened. Kinda iconic though.
  10. Britney Spears' attorney, Sam Ingham, has filed legal docs requesting a woman named Jodi Montgomery permanently replace Jamie Spears as conservator over Britney the person. Montgomery has remained Britney's personal conservator since September 2019, however the role was temporary. In other words, Britney petitioned for the resignation of her father as conservator of her person for good. Around that time, Mr. Spears allegedly physically assaulted one of Britney's sons. This means Mr. Spears will no longer have an official say in Britney's personal and day-to-day decisions, like whom she can see. It's worth mentioning that Mr. Spears played a role in Montgomery's insertion in the first place. Mr. Spears remains as co-conservator over Britney's finances and business decisions alongside Bessemer Trust Company. This news was first revealed one week ago, however court documents have now finally made their way online. Via TMZ: A line in the docs that Britney's team filed is worth taking a close look at: "Petitioner expressly reserves the right to petition for termination of this conservatorship under Probate Code section 1861. Nothing in the within petition shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of that right." Thank you to @IconicShow for posting this first. Photo by godd.essbritney
  11. I didn't anticipate posting this until tomorrow because I thought there'd be more to report, but the court hearing was over in a matter of minutes with no significant changes. I know we're all frustrated, but I'm still choosing to be optimistic (as hard as that is). Related:
  12. Forbes implies a really important question. If Britney earned $672 million, but her net worth is estimated around $60 million, then where's all the money? A copy + paste quote from Forbes' new article: They cite MoneyNation.com, but Forbes doesn't take typically figures like this at face-value. I wouldn't be surprised if they did their own digging before publishing. Interestingly, it appears a company connected to Lou Taylor recently moved around $600 million. So, what gives? Related:
  13. Jamie Spears denies claims made by House Republicans Matt Gaetz and Jim Jordan, who wrote a letter to congress citing Britney Spears' conservatorship as an example of alleged conservatorship abuse and calls Jamie's motives questionable. Mr. Spears via his lawyer, Vivian Thoreen, who serves as his mouthpiece, tells TMZ that's flat out wrong. TMZ recants what Thoreen told them: "the conservatorship has been a system of checks and balances with annual accountings, reviews and expert opinions. Not only that, Thoreen tells us Britney and her own legal team have been a part of the decisions involving the conservatorship over the years." They add: "She continues by laying out the structure of the conservatorship, saying, 'Britney’s Conservatorship of the Estate was co-managed by a private professional fiduciary and her father until early 2019. At that time, Britney requested in court papers that her father be the sole conservator of her estate. Her Conservatorship of the Person is not managed by her father but by a private professional fiduciary.'" Gaetz and Jordan called Jamie's motives "questionable" in their letter. Thoreen denies that as well, saying: "Jamie Spears has diligently and professionally carried out his duties as one of Britney’s conservators, and his love for his daughter and dedication to protecting her is clearly apparent to the court." Thoreen also mentions that neither Britney nor her legal team have ever filed a petition to end the conservatorship. --- The devil works hard but Vivian works even harder.... or not because she's basically doing the bare minimum to ensure that Britney's rights are outweighed by the wishes of her infirm, alcoholic, abusive father who is the sole reason Britney has restricted access to her own children Related:
  14. The protest outside the courthouse is getting media attention, I'll be posting notable developements and images here. Feel free to add/contribute. Love you guys #freebritney Update: It appears Britney was ~unable to connect to the court hearing~ and it's been delayed... However, her Instagram account was able to post a photo. Update: The connection error story is untrue. Read more about what happened at Britney's court hearing here. Related:
  15. I rarely make threads. It’s not my thing. I’m not good at it. But, I feel that the ongoing mishandling of Britney fortune (as the late Michael Sands once put it, the financial r*** of Britney Spears...”) deserves and most definitely needs to be more widely discussed by the public that’s paying attention now and of course investigated !! I’m reposting a thread by Surprise Witnes. Not sure if it’s been shared already but since the entire is woke to what’s been happening to Britney Spears as well as her finances (including $ set aside for her two sons Preston and Jayden) it’s the perfect time to highlight this yet again! Credit to Surprise Witness and Thank You!! To say this saga is complex is an understatement!! But I believe that this fan base and now the general public is ready now to fully focus on not just the human rights aspect of this case but the financial situation. We can multitask. Please share SW’s thread with literally everyone you know. If you’re fortunate to speak a second/multiple language/s, please translate this thread and ask your friends and family to share it. I think it’s safe to say that this is just part of a huge, calculated, maliciously intentional, longstanding and ongoing robbery of Britney Spears. Disgusting to think about because theft is wrong but stealing from a woman who has no idea what’s actually happening to her finances, a woman who’s been deemed by the Court to lack mental capacity to hire or fire her lawyer, etc, is so evil. If Britney is mentally incompetent why does the Court allow people to steal from her?? Even if there are loopholes these crooks jump through there should be more oversight & changes made so nobody can run a con scene like this in the system!! Britney has no idea what’s happening with the SJB Trust money other than what these lying snakes choose to tell her, lies or half truths, it is sickening!!! At least 2 of the people mentioned are related to Britney: her dad Jamie Spears and her younger sister Jamie Lynn Spears who’s still heavily personally and also likely financially bound to that crook Lou Taylor. A lot of us have long questioned WHY has Britney’s mother Lynne Spears been silent all these years but only chose to get off her *** and do/say something about her daughter Britney’s situation ONLY WHEN she noticed (or was alerted) to the fact that the monies SJB Trust 💰 holds was being compromised.🤨🤨🤨🤨 All of these people are morally bankrupt frauds!!!! The only one coming outta this **** show smelling like ROSES 🌹 is Britney.
  16. Britney's older brother Bryan Spears gave an interview about Britney. In it, he touches on the conservatorship and the #FreeBritney movement. Bryan gave the interview from mom Lynne's Kentwood estate, Serenity. The full thing is out now. I don't know what to think. On the #FreeBritney movement: "I am aware of it. Just to see that kind of interest in people and our fans and in society... to care that much about her and everyone in this family... we truly appreciate it. It means a lot." What does #FreeBritney mean? "That I don't quite know what their meaning is. I don't follow it that well. I am aware that they feel like maybe she's being confined or held against her will in some capacity. I can't speak for them." "The women in this family are very very strong-minded and have their own opinion and they want to do what they want to do. As much as I admire that, as a guy, one of two guys in this entire family, it kind of sucks." On the conservatorship: "She's been in this thing for quite some time now. Obviously there was a need for it in the beginning, I assume everyone knows - the issues that were going on - they've made some changes. All we can do is hope for the best." "I think we got caught by surprise by it all. It's been a great thing for our family up until this point. We're hoping for the best." Bryan adds he's not sure how the conservatorship was initiated. It's very clear it was enacted by dad Jamie. How does Britney feel about it? "In the beginning it was hard. Any time you're going through struggles and having to make big adjustments... that is very difficult. What I think kind of got us all through it... all of us have been pretty close all these years, normal fights... nothing ever major... we kind of came together, and not everybody agreed with it. Everybody had their own opinion. But in the end I think we made the right choice. But how it proceeds from here... I don't know." "In general, I think [Jamie] has done the best he could given the situation he was put in." "As you know, with any family, one person might be on stage and doing this, but it's a sacrifice from everybody. Everybody's putting in, to some degree, a little bit to keep it going." Does Britney want the conservatorship to end? "I'm assuming... I can't speak for that... There's so much false press out there. I would assume like anybody would want to get out of the situation. Who wouldn't?" Do you talk to Britney? "We speak constantly. She's always wanted to get out of it. It's very frustrating to have... whether someone's coming in peace to help or they're coming in with an attitude. Having someone constantly tell you to do something has gotta be frustrating. So yeah, she's wanted to get out of it for quite some time." "I know what she wants, at the end of the day what is the reality of that?" Watch the full thing below:
  17. Thought some of you might enjoy this. Watch till the end...
  18. The Guardian covered the story on the documentary. The comment section on FB has been beyond positive and supportive. You can check the article here. I've highlighted some phrases in bold to emphasise their stance on the whole subjective. In an effective new documentary, the difficult life of a pop star is examined from family struggles to the toll of being at the mercy of the media. There is no shortage of horrifying, look-away-from-the-screen moments in Framing Britney Spears, the New York Times-produced documentary that examines, in succinct, bruising fashion, the pop star’s incendiary career and controversial legal guardianship. There’s Britney, 10 years old and having just belted out an impressive rendition of the Judds’ Love Can Build a Bridge on Star Search, asked by the host Ed McMahon if she had a boyfriend. There’s Britney, tanned and polished at the height of her early-aughts fame, asked in a press conference if she is a virgin (she balks, then answers yes, then, ever the pleasant American sweetheart, thanks the interviewer for the question). There’s Britney, messy bun and sweats, picking up fast food under a barrage of camera flashes, appearing catatonic in a passenger seat under a barrage of camera flashes, crumpled in a restaurant booth under a barrage of camera flashes; by 2007, with a shorn head and glazed eyes, clearly having a mental breakdown, strobe-lit by said camera flashes. The uncomfortable quality of these images and video is due, in large part, to their mundanity – a celebrity off-stage, doing unremarkable things; the paparazzi hordes that were a staple of the mid-2000s, at the height of TMZ, tabloid and gossip blog power; the familiarity of the whole circus, which exists in America’s collective cultural memory as time capsule, old joke, or well-meaning meme (the classic “If Britney could survive 2007, you can do this” joke). None of these images, none of this information about Britney’s stratospheric teenage fame, mental breakdown in 2008, and the legal conservatorship that has governed her daily life in the 13 years since, is new. We just don’t often sit with the evidence – not this cohesively, not this viscerally. In a brisk, bracing 75 minutes, Framing Britney combs through the mountain of archival Britney material – coming of age just before the internet, she was a heavily documented star from the start – from her childhood in smalltown Kentwood, Louisiana, to the cascading highlights of her career: tinkering in the studio, the smash success of … Baby One More Time and Oops I Did It Again, mass fascination over her relationship with the ‘NSync boybander Justin Timberlake, marriage to backup dancer Kevin Federline, mass fascination with her fitness as a mother, breakdown. Much of the film is dedicated to explaining the legal concept of conservatorship – a court-appointed guardianship usually for elderly or infirm people – and subtly (or, with a couple of first-person interviews, not so subtly) arguing against the arrangement that places Britney’s father, Jamie Spears (according to the film, a largely absent figure in her life until money was concerned), in control of a 39-year-old pop star still raking in millions. Adam Streisand, a Los Angeles-based lawyer who specializes in conservatorship arrangements, recalls in the film a meeting with Spears at the Beverly Hills Hotel immediately after her involuntary psychiatric hold in January 2008 – an event heavily documented by paparazzi at the time – in which the singer reportedly accepted the conservatorship on one condition: that the conservator not be her father. (The court subsequently barred Streisand from representing Spears on grounds of inability to seek counsel based on a sealed medical report, and appointed the lawyer Samuel D Ingham III to represent her instead; as of 2016, Ingham had collected $2m in fees from Spears’ estate). Still, this information is not new (Streisand’s memory is included in the New York Times’s thorough investigation into the t***** conservatorship in 2016). Though the film features several compelling interviews – most notably with the former travel companion and assistant Felicia Culotta and Kevin Tancharoen, the backup dancer and tour director from 1999-2004, who both attest to Britney’s command as an artist, a driver of her own career – there is no participation from Britney, her family or anyone now in her inner circle. (Her brother Bryan Spears, however, offered a rare glimpse into the family dynamic on the podcast As NOT Seen on TV in July 2020, saying “She’s always wanted to get out of it … having someone constantly tell you to do something has got to be frustrating. She’s wanted to get out of it for quite some time.” He also said the Spears women’s strong-mindedness “sucks”.) Yet the effect of synthesis – a bottomless well of evidence distilled and arranged in one place, with poignant commentary from Times cultural critics – is nonetheless revelatory. Perhaps unsurprisingly, given the nostalgic affection for Britney, the film has triggered an outpouring of horror and humility, a bandwagoning of some celebs on the #FreeBritney movement, and several damning reconsiderations of our past fascination with Britney’s descent, or Justin Timberlake’s general immunity to blowback for capitalizing on and exacerbating attention at the expense of women who supported him (Britney, Janet Jackson; see: him affirming a radio host’s question if he “****ed Britney Spears”, an indefensible December 2002 Details magazine cover that reads “Can we ever forgive Justin Timberlake for all that sissy music? Hey … at least he got into Britney’s pants”). The film is another notch in a string of slow-rolling, ever-expanding reconsiderations of American celebrity culture, and particularly the female tabloid figures of the 90s and aughts, one facilitated by the larger #MeToo retelling of ***, power and the spectra of traumas faced by women, partly by the simple passage of time. From films such as the Oscar-winning OJ: Made in America to Lorena Bobbitt, such revision relies less on new information than simply staring hard enough at the existing record. Asif Kapadia’s delicate, harrowing documentary Amy compiled audio recordings and home video to capture the rise and frenzied fall of Amy Winehouse, victim of a similar, and concurrent, frenzy of paparazzi sharks, lucrative tabloid coverage and public derision, even as her musical talent remained esteemed. Spears carried the extra burden of embodying America’s psychotic contradictions over *** for young women – dress **** but be virginal, convey that you want it but never, God forbid, know what you want, let alone get it; tread as closely to the line of actual *** as possible but never cross it. She rocketed to fame in an era, as the Times critic Wesley Morris astutely points out in the film, when Bill Clinton’s scandalous affair with the White House intern Monica Lewinsky – another big tabloid story whose heroes and villains have been revised with the passage of time and #MeToo – brought the lewd discussion of ***, and the specter of *** panic, back into the public sphere (and tasteless Jay Leno jokes). Memory is a hazy, gauzy thing. You can remember, intellectually and in tabloid snippets, the frenzy over Spears in the mid-to-late aughts, but not recall the galling starkness of its imagery – a woman hunted and literally hounded by men across Los Angeles, the harried, vertigo-inducing funhouse of camera flashes. Spears’s meltdown was mundane enough to merit a category – what has Britney Spears lost this year? – on the gameshow Family Feud (answers included her mind, her children and her dignity). That detail was probably not memorable enough in 2008; it’s unforgettably crude now. Ultimately, the film offers little in resolution, as there isn’t one: Britney the person remains unknowable, no matter how ardently #FreeBritney supporters scan her Instagram captions or “connect the dots”, to borrow language that feels uncomfortably conspiratorial, for clues to her mental state or personal opinions, or what goes down at another hearing on her legal status on 11 February. What is clear is our continued fixation with her, our collective culpability in even passing interest, the misogynistic, cruel cultural mores – whether for *** or mental health – that become clear in rearview, too late. In 2008, fresh into her conservatorship, Jamie Spears allowed MTV documentary cameras to film Britney, who offered one of her few public takes on the arrangement to date: “If I wasn’t under the restraints that I’m under right now, with all the lawyers and doctors, and people analyzing me every day, and all that kinda stuff – if that wasn’t there, I’d feel so liberated, and feel like myself,” she said. Much of the discussion on Framing Britney will hinge on the controversy of her guardianship, the growing #FreeBritney movement. But there is a second point in the typical Britney “all that kinda stuff” that demands attention, too – an indictment of all of us, sitting in plain sight. Overall, a class journalism as usual. Very factual, analytic, and also supportive but correctly done in a traditional fashion only The Guardian can do. Their take is important and strengthens the movement even more! P.S. For my fellow UK folk, this is from The Guardian: Framing Britney Spears is now available on Hulu in the US with a UK date to be announced. -> Expect a UK premiere soon either independently or through Hulu.
  19. Update: The following text that's crossed out is defamatory and false according to a demand letter from Lou Taylor: Courtney Love was almost placed in a conservatorship by the same people who put Britney Spears in one, and she says it nearly killed her. A user on Instagram asked: “Is it true that Lou Taylor – who planned the conservatorship for Britney with her father – wanted to put you in a conservatorship too?” Courtney replied, “Short answer is yes. Lou did try. for a mutated strain of a conservatorship. She and the ‘jeryls’ made an attempt to control kurts name and likeness and all nirvana songs (96 per cent). Then sell the publishing, by which time I’d be in a conservatorship or more likely? Dead.” “I was successful at blocking only Lou, that’s just because I chant a lot which makes me lucky. But, not her buddies. I just looked at Britney’s account. There’s no point in sticking my neck out for her now, her pack of wolves almost killed me and my only child,” she continued. Courtney added that Britney “looks damaged, fu**ed up for life.” Courtney had a platonic relationship with Britney's former manager Sam Lutfi for years as well. “I just got away from (Sam) lutfi after 8.5 hellish years. Bad as he is? He doesn’t hold a candle to those people,” Love said. “I’ve tried to lobby attorneys for years with a glimmer of humanity to take on Spears situation and they always p***y out,” she continued. “And frankly I’m done with it.” Courtney added she knows “more about the Spears case than almost anyone there is. There was a time I’d have told you anything. Everything”. “It’s one of the worst things I’ve ever seen done to another woman and trust me I’ve seen it all,” she continued. “But I’m OK now in Europe recovering from a near death illness that probably happened due to the stress of out maneuvering those ***holes for pre-Britney, 25 some years … we finally have a manager they’re all scared of and we are safe. I’m OK and most of all frances is OK. I’m not dragging us though the PTSD and trauma that Lou's name brings up in me.” She finished with: no one can do that to us again”. “In exchange for that security. I don’t get to talk about the particulars. I’m keeping the security. I’m sorry but I can’t help you further .@vanityfair Britney ‘expose’ was a lazy farce. If that’s all there is for justice? **** it. I’ll make my own government. And do as I’m told.” Related:
  20. I came across this video on YouTube highlighting some of Britney's top moments with the crowd during POM. I seen a few of them but majority I've never seen before. She looked like she was having such a good time and more than capable to take care of herself. #FreeBritney https://youtu.be/xLDVermnGNE (Sorry, sadly I can't figure out how to embed a YouTube video)
×
×
  • Create New...

We noticed you're using an ad blocker  :badthoughts_gun_kris_genner_thinking_debating:

Thanks for visiting Exhale! Your support is greatly appreciated 💜  

Exhale survives through advertising revenue. Please, disable your ad block extension to help us and continue browsing Exhale. 🙏

I've disabled ad block